Abstract
Water-and-mud inrush disasters have become a major challenge in underground engineering for the construction of tunnels in sandstone and slate interbedded Presinian strata. Disaster prediction and prevention rely in part on realistic modeling and observation of the disaster process, as well as the identification and examination of the underlying mechanisms. Based on the geological conditions and the historical records of the Xinping Tunnel on the China—Laos Railway, an engineering geological model of the water-and-mud inrush was established. A physical model test that accurately reproduced water-and-mud inrush during tunnel excavation in sandstone and slate interbedded strata was also carried out. Then, testing was conducted that examined the stress and strain, seepage pressure, and high-leakage flow of the surrounding rock. The results indicated that the water-and-mud inrush proceeded through three stages: seepage stage, high-leakage flow stage, and attenuation stage. In essence, the disaster was a catastrophic process, during which the water-resistant stratum was reduced to a critical safety thickness, a water-inrush channel formed, and the water-resistant stratum gradually failed under the influence of excavation unloading and in situ stress—seepage coupling. Parameters such as the stress and strain, seepage pressure, and flow of the surrounding rock had evident stage-related features during water-and-mud inrush, and their variation indicated the formation, development, and evolution of the disaster. As the tunnel face advanced, the trend of the stress—strain curve of the surrounding rock shifted from sluggish to rapid in its speed of increase. The characteristics of strain energy density revealed the erosion and weakening effect of groundwater on the surrounding rock. The seepage pressure and the thickness of the water-resistant stratum had a positive linear relationship, and the flow and thickness a negative linear relationship. There was a pivotal point at which the seepage pressure changed from high to low and the flow shifted from low to high. The thickness of the water-resistant stratum corresponding to the pivotal point was deemed the critical safety thickness.
摘要
目的
前震旦系砂板岩互层地层突水突泥灾害给隧道工程建设带来了巨大的困难。本文旨在通过室内模型试验,再现前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥灾害的灾变演化过程,分析围岩应力应变、渗透压力与流量随隔水层厚度减小的变化规律,揭示砂板岩互层隧道隔水层渗透失稳突水突泥的灾变诱发机制,为突水突泥灾害的防控提供重要参考。
创新点
1. 建立了前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥工程地质模型;2. 通过模型试验再现了前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥灾变演化过程;3. 揭示了隔水层厚度减小过程中隧道围岩应力应变、渗流压力与流量等特征参数的变化规律。
方法
1.通过突水突泥灾害统计(图3和6)和地质结构特征(图4和5)分析,构建前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥工程地质模型(图7);2.通过正交试验设计和材料配比试验,研制板岩和砂岩的流固耦合相似材料(图12和13);3.通过模型试验,再现前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥灾变演化过程(图16)。
结论
1. 前震旦系砂板岩互层隧道突水突泥灾变演化过程可划分为渗流阶段、高涌流阶段和衰减阶段3个阶段,围岩应力应变、渗流压力与流量的变化具有阶段性特征;2. 围岩应变能密度特征揭示了地下水对围岩的侵蚀弱化作用。随着应变能密度的增大,围岩稳定性减弱,而拱顶在渗流阶段的应变能密度比拱肩高20.7%;3. 渗流压力与隔水层厚度呈线性正相关关系,流量与隔水层厚度呈线性负相关关系。特征参数突变点为隔水层劣化特征点,该点对应的隔水层厚度为临界安全厚度;4. 突水突泥本质上是在开挖卸荷和应力-渗流耦合作用下突水突泥通道的形成、隔水层厚度减小到临界厚度、隔水层逐渐丧失阻水能力的灾变过程。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choo CS, Ong DEL, 2020. Assessment of non-linear rock strength parameters for the estimation of pipe-jacking forces. Part 2. Numerical modeling. Engineering Geology, 265:105405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105405
Fan HB, Zhang YH, He SY, et al., 2018. Hazards and treatment of karst tunneling in Qinling-Daba mountainous area: overview and lessons learnt from Yichang-Wanzhou Railway system. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(19):679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7860-1
Jiang HM, Li L, Rong XL, et al., 2017. Model test to investigate waterproof-resistant slab minimum safety thickness for water inrush geohazards. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 62:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.004
Li G, Ma WB, Tian SM, et al., 2021. Groundwater inrush control and parameters optimization of curtain grouting reinforcement for the Jingzhai Tunnel. Geofluids, 2021: 6634513. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634513
Li LP, Tu WF, Shi SS, et al., 2016. Mechanism of water inrush in tunnel construction in karst area. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(S1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1181342
Li LP, Sun SQ, Wang J, et al., 2020. Experimental study of the precursor information of the water inrush in shield tunnels due to the proximity of a water-filled cave. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 130:104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104320
Li SC, Liu HL, Li LP, et al., 2016. Large scale three-dimensional seepage analysis model test and numerical simulation research on undersea tunnel. Applied Ocean Research, 59:510–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.07.013
Li SC, Gao CL, Zhou ZQ, et al., 2019. Analysis on the precursor information of water inrush in karst tunnels: a true triaxial model test study. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 52(2):373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1582-2
Liang DX, Jiang ZQ, Zhu SY, et al., 2016. Experimental research on water inrush in tunnel construction. Natural Hazards, 81(1):467–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2090-2
Ma D, Bai HB, Miao XX, et al., 2016. Compaction and seepage properties of crushed limestone particle mixture: an experimental investigation for Ordovician karst collapse pillar groundwater inrush. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4799-3
Ong DEL, Jong SC, Cheng WC, 2022. Ground and ground-water responses due to shaft excavation in organic soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 148(8):05022003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002820
Pan DD, Li SC, Xu ZH, et al., 2019. Experimental and numerical study of the water inrush mechanisms of underground tunnels due to the proximity of a water-filled karst cavern. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(8):6207–6219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01491-5
Wang J, Li SC, Li LP, et al., 2020. Mechanism of water inrush in fractures and block collapse under hydraulic pressure. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 177:625–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.05.028
Wang XT, Li SC, Xu ZH, et al., 2019. Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels excavation based on normal cloud model. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(5):3783–3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1294-6
Wu J, Li SC, Xu ZH, et al., 2017. Flow characteristics and escape-route optimization after water inrush in a backward-excavated karst tunnel. International Journal of Geomechanics, 17(4):04016096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000787
Xu ZL, Luo YB, Chen JX, et al., 2021. Mechanical properties and reasonable proportioning of similar materials in physical model test of tunnel lining cracking. Construction and Building Materials, 300:123960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123960
Xue YG, Kong FM, Li SC, et al., 2021. Water and mud inrush hazard in underground engineering: genesis, evolution and prevention. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 114:103987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103987
Yang J, Yin ZY, Laouafa F, et al., 2019a. Internal erosion in dike-on-foundation modeled by a coupled hydromechanical approach. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 43(3):663–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2877
Yang J, Yin ZY, Laouafa F, et al., 2019b. Modeling coupled erosion and filtration of fine particles in granular media. Acta Geotechnica, 14(6): 1615–1627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00808-8
Yang J, Yin ZY, Laouafa F, et al., 2020a. Hydromechanical modeling of granular soils considering internal erosion. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 57(2):157–172. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0653
Yang J, Yin ZY, Laouafa F, et al., 2020b. Three-dimensional hydromechanical modeling of internal erosion in dike-on-foundation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 44(8):1200–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3057
Yang J, Yin ZY, Liu YJ, et al., 2022. Multiphysics modelling of backfill grouting in sandy soils during TBM tunnelling. Acta Geotechnica, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01528-2
Yang WM, Fang ZD, Wang H, et al., 2019a. Analysis on water inrush process of tunnel with large buried depth and high water pressure. Processes, 7(3):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7030134
Yang WM, Yang X, Fang ZD, et al., 2019b. Model test for water inrush caused by karst caves filled with confined water in tunnels. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 12(24): 749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4907-x
Yang WM, Wang MX, Zhou ZQ, et al., 2019c. A true triaxial geomechanical model test apparatus for studying the precursory information of water inrush from impermeable rock mass failure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 93:103078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103078
Zhang SC, Guo WJ, Li YY, et al., 2017. Experimental simulation of fault water inrush channel evolution in a coal mine floor. Mine Water and the Environment, 36(3):443–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-017-0433-9
Zhao N, Wang YC, Meng B, et al., 2018. Numerical simulation on the seepage properties of soil-rock mixture. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2018:1859319. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1859319
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National High-Speed Rail United Foundation of China (No. U1934213).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Peng XU and Zhi-qiang ZHANG designed the research. Peng XU and Peng PENG were responsible for the model test and paper writing. Rong-hua WEI processed the corresponding data. Zhi-qiang ZHANG helped to organize the manuscript. Peng XU revised and edited the final version.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Conflict of interest
Peng XU, Peng PENG, Rong-hua WEI, and Zhi-qiang ZHANG declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, P., Peng, P., Wei, Rh. et al. Model test of the mechanism underpinning water-and-mud inrush disasters during tunnel excavation in sandstone and slate interbedded Presinian strata. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 23, 882–899 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200134
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200134
Key words
- Water-and-mud inrush
- Sandstone and slate interbedded Presinian strata
- Model test
- Evolution law
- Thickness of water-resistant stratum
- Inducing mechanism