Skip to main content
Log in

Lightweight fired clay brick production for archeological heritage site maintenance application

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, azodicarbonamide (AC), a thermo-sensitive chemical blowing agent, was applied to produce the lightweight fired clay brick with low thermal conductivity and suitable mechanical property. Rice husk was also added to induce the ancient brick texture and brick reinforcement for the archeological site maintenance purpose. Prior to production, thermal decomposition of AC was estimated to design the firing condition, and it was added from 0 to 3.0 pph. AC exhibited suitable thermal sensitivity that could begin pore formation via gas releasing process at the firing temperature of 300 °C. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) indicated that the chemical compositions of the clay bricks before and after firing were the same excepted for Cl, which was possibly liberated under firing process. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis showed some structural changes and the crystal transformation after firing. In comparison, all chemical-blown bricks showed the significant decrease of bulk density, indicating the capability of AC to lighten the brick by generating the porous structure. The compressive strength values were higher than the requirement value of the severe weathering grade of the clay brick, which was specified by ASTM C62-12. In summary, the optimal use of AC blowing agent of 2.0 pph with the assistance of rice husk provided the bricks with lower bulk density, higher specific compressive strength, higher porosity and lower thermal insulation properties than neat fired clay brick.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Mahasuwanchai P, Athisakul C, Sairuamyat P, Tangchirapat W, Leelataviwat S, Chucheepsakul S (2021) An alternative method for long-term monitoring of Thai historic pagodas based on terrestrial laser scanning data: a case study of Wat Krachee in Ayutthaya. Adv Civ Eng 2021:5587046. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5587046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma S, Wang L, Bao P (2022) Study on properties of blue-brick masonry materials for historical buildings. J Renew Mater 10(7):1961–1978. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2022.018755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wethyavivorn B, Surit S, Apichatyakul C, Lerdsivanon N (2016) Model verification of Thai historic masonry monuments. J Perform Constr Facil 30:04014188. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Solikin M, Ikhsan N (2018) Styrofoam as partial substitution of fine aggregate in lightweight concrete bricks. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol 1977, p 030041. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042961

  5. Maza-Ignacio OT, Jiménez-Quero VG, Guerrero-Paz J, Montes-García P (2020) Recycling untreated sugarcane bagasse ash and industrial wastes for the preparation of resistant, lightweight and ecological fired bricks. Constr Build Mater 234:117314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pérez-Villarejo L, Eliche-Quesada D, Martín-Pascual J, Martín-Morales M, Zamorano M (2020) Comparative study of the use of different biomass from olive grove in the manufacture of sustainable ceramic lightweight bricks. Constr Build Mater 231:117103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abdul Kadir A, Sarani NA (2020) Utilization of palm oil fuel ash in brick manufacturing for lightweight fired clay brick production. Int J Sustain Constr Eng Technol 11:136–150. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2020.11.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutas J, Mana A, Pitak L (2012) Effect of rice husk and rice husk ash to properties of bricks. Procedia Eng 32:1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.02.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petchwattana N, Covavisaruch S (2011) Influences of particle sizes and contents of chemical blowing agents on foaming wood plastic composites prepared from poly(vinyl chloride) and rice hull. Mater Des 32(5):2844–2850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Hu Z, Liu J (2023) Freeze-thaw resistance of concrete containing azodicarbonamide expansive agent. Constr Build Mater 367:130335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robledo-Ortiz JR, Zepeda C, Gomez C, Rodrigue D, González-Núñez R (2008) Non-isothermal decomposition kinetics of azodicarbonamide in high density polyethylene using a capillary rheometer. Polym Test 27(6):730–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Charoeythornkhajhornchai P, Samthong C, Boonkerd K, Somwangthanaroj A (2017) Effect of azodicarbonamide on microstructure, cure kinetics and physical properties of natural rubber foam. J Cell Plast 53(3):287–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x16652101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu T, Li J, Han X, Liu R, Cai C, Wang H (2022) Effect of blowing agent concentration of ultra-low density NBR/PVC composite foams on compressive behavior and energy‐absorption characteristics. J Vinyl Addit Technol 28:640. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dou Y, Rodrigue D (2022) Morphological, thermal and mechanical properties of recycled HDPE foams via rotational molding. J Cell Plast 58(2):305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955x211013793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Aravind SL, Sivapirakasam SP, Balasubramanian KR, Surianarayanan M (2020) Thermo-kinetic studies on azodicarbonamide/potassium periodate airbag gas generants. Process Saf Environ Prot 144:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.06.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiang K-Y, Chou P-H, Hua C-R, Chien K-L, Cheeseman C (2009) Lightweight bricks manufactured from water treatment sludge and rice husks. J Hazard Mater 171:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Hadhrami LM, Ahmad A (2009) Assessment of thermal performance of different types of masonry bricks used in Saudi Arabia. Appl Therm Eng 29(5):1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Charai M, Sghiouri H, Mezrhab A, Karkri M, El Hammouti K (2020) Comparative study of a clay before and after fired brick-making process. Mater Today Proc 31:S103–S108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez-Gonzalez E, Salmazo LO, Lopez-Gil A, Rodriguez-Perez MA (2019) Study of the effect of different electron irradiation doses on the decomposition temperature of azodicarbonamide. Polym Eng Sci 59(4):791–798. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.25007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bories C, Borredon M-E, Vedrenne E, Vilarem G (2014) Development of eco-friendly porous fired clay bricks using pore-forming agents: a review. J Environ Manag 143:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hossain SS, Mathur L, Majhi MR, Roy PK (2019) Manufacturing of green building brick: recycling of waste for construction purpose. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 21(2):281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0788-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Silva GHMJS, Perera BVA (2018) Effect of waste rice husk ash (RHA) on structural, thermal and acoustic properties of fired clay bricks. J Build Eng 18:252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Silva GHMJS, Surangi MLC (2017) Effect of waste rice husk ash on structural, thermal and run-off properties of clay roof tiles. Constr Build Mater 154:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang P, Wang Y, Yang S, Niu W, Wang X, Li P (2022) Analysis, simulation and experimental study of the tensile stress calibration of ceramic cylindrical pressure housings. J Mar Sci Eng 10(4):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10040499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Salih MM, Osofero AI, Imbabi MS (2020) Constitutive models for fibre reinforced soil bricks. Constr Build Mater 240:117806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sena da Fonseca B, Galhano C, Seixas D (2015) Technical feasibility of reusing coal combustion by-products from a thermoelectric power plant in the manufacture of fired clay bricks. Appl Clay Sci 104:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2014.11.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Han W, Pei S, Liu F (2022) Material characterization of the brick in the Ming Dynasty heritage wall of Pianguan County: a case study. Case Stud Constr Mater 16:e00940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ottosen LM, Bertelsen IMG, Jensen PE, Kirkelund GM (2020) Sewage sludge ash as resource for phosphorous and material for clay brick manufacturing. Constr Build Mater 249:118684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aydin T (2018) Development of porous lightweight clay bricks using a replication method. J Aust Ceram Soc 54:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-017-0138-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. La Rubia-García MD, Yebra-Rodríguez Á, Eliche-Quesada D, Corpas-Iglesias FA, López-Galindo A (2012) Assessment of olive mill solid residue (pomace) as an additive in lightweight brick production. Constr Build Mater 36:495–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Phonphuak N, Chindaprasirt P (2018) Utilization of sugarcane bagasse ash to improve properties of fired clay brick. Chiang Mai J Sci 45(4):1855–1862

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eliche-Quesada D, Felipe-Sesé MA, López-Pérez JA, Infantes-Molina A (2017) Characterization and evaluation of rice husk ash and wood ash in sustainable clay matrix bricks. Ceram Int 43:463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.09.181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng Y, Peng X, Yang M, Shi H, Wang W, Tang X, Wu Y (2020) The performances of the baking-free bricks of non-sintered wrap-shell lightweight aggregates from dredged sediments. Constr Build Mater 238:117587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bompa DV, Elghazouli AY (2020) Compressive behaviour of fired-clay brick and lime mortar masonry components in dry and wet conditions. Mater Struct 53(3):60. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01493-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Merello P, Fernández-Navajas Á, Curiel-Esparza J, Zarzo M, García-Diego F-J (2014) Characterisation of thermo-hygrometric conditions of an archaeological site affected by unlike boundary weather conditions. Build Environ 76:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Berardi U (2019) The impact of aging and environmental conditions on the effective thermal conductivity of several foam materials. Energy 182:777–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Arslan C, Gencel O, Borazan I, Sutcu M, Erdogmus E (2021) Effect of waste-based micro cellulose fiber as pore maker on characteristics of fired clay bricks. Constr Build Mater 300:124298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Upper Central Research Network (UCRN) for the financial support of this research. We acknowledge the supports of Dr. Pornnapa Kasemsiri, Dr. Phisut Naknaen, Dr.Thanut Amatayakul and Dr.Wasinee Channuan.

Funding

This research was financial supported by the Upper Central Research Network (UCRN) research grant (Contract no. 012/2554).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nawadon Petchwattana.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sukkaneewat, B., Petchwattana, N. & Sanetuntikul, J. Lightweight fired clay brick production for archeological heritage site maintenance application. Mater Struct 56, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02197-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02197-7

Keywords

Navigation