Skip to main content
Log in

Carbon fibers' percolation in smart cementitious materials considering sand characteristics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-sensing concrete, is created by including electrically conductive fibers in cement-based materials. These fibers may help reduce electrical resistivity and develop a piezo resistive behavior. Smart Concrete is therefore able to serve as a structural and a sensing material simultaneously, which eliminates the need for external instrumentation in structural health monitoring. The presence of sand has been found to influence resistivity in the case of fibrous mortar. This phenomenon is referred to as “double percolation”. However, little attention has been paid to how the size of sand grains impacts the electrical percolation. The originality of this paper is to study the effect of sand, its particle size distribution and volume fraction within fibrous mortars, for different carbon fibers percolation status. Two types of sand were compared: a standard sand (0–2 mm) and a fine sand (0–0.5 mm). Four volume fractions of sand were compared, each one presenting a different connectivity status of sand structure. The percolation threshold of carbon fibers was estimated analytically. The analytical results were validated experimentally, using AC impedance measurements between 4 Hz and 1 MHz. The “double percolation” phenomenon was confirmed. The novelty was to illustrate the effect of sand particle size distribution on the impedance of fibrous mortar: for a sand volume fraction up to 40%, standard sand had a beneficial effect on the electrical impedance at a fiber volume fraction below 0.3%, and a very slight detrimental effect when that fraction exceeds 0.3%. For fine sand, no beneficial effect of sand aggregates on the impedance was observed. For both sands, the impedance of mortars with a 50% sand volume fraction was considerably higher than for cement paste, confirming the relevance of the double percolation theory. The usage of standard sand below maximum packing density is recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen PW, Chung DDL (1995) Improving the electrical conductivity of composites comprised of short conducting fibers in a nonconducting matrix: the addition of a nonconducting particulate filler. J Electron Mater 24:47–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02659726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen P-W, Chung DDL (1993) Concrete reinforced with up to 0.2 vol% of short carbon fibres. Composites 24(1):33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4361(93)90261-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding S, Xiang Y, Ni Y-Q, Thakur VK, Wang X, Han B, Ou J (2022) In-situ synthesizing carbon nanotubes on cement to develop self-sensing cementitious composites for smart high-speed rail infrastructures. Nano Today 43:101438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung DDL (2023) A critical review of electrical-resistance-based self-sensing in conductive cement-based materials. Carbon 203:311–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.11.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang W, Wu S, Dai H (2006) Fatigue behavior and life prediction of carbon fiber reinforced concrete under cyclic flexural loading. Mater Sci Eng A 434(1):347–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tian Z, Li Y, Zheng J, Wang S (2019) A state-of-the-art on self-sensing concrete: materials, fabrication and properties. Compos B Eng 177:107437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoheneder J, Flores-Vivian I, Lin Z, Zilberman P, Sobolev K (2015) The performance of stress-sensing smart fiber reinforced composites in moist and sodium chloride environments. Compos B Eng 73:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen D-L, Lam MN-T, Kim D-J, Song J (2020) Direct tensile self-sensing and fracture energy of steel-fiber-reinforced concretes. Compos Part B Eng 183:107714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang W, Xie HC, Liu JW, Shi B (2004) Experimental study on elastic stress self-monitoring of carbon fiber reinforced smart concrete beams. J Southeast Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 34:647–650

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saafi M, Andrew K, Tang PL, McGhon D, Taylor S, Rahman M, Yang S, Zhou X (2013) Multifunctional properties of carbon nanotube/fly ash geopolymeric nanocomposites. Constr Build Mater 49:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun M, Liu Q, Li Z, Hu Y (2000) A study of piezoelectric properties of carbon fiber reinforced concrete and plain cement paste during dynamic loading. Cem Concr Res 30(10):1593–1595. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00338-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang D, Xu S (2008) Experimental study on fracture parameter of three-point bending beam based on smart properties of CFRC. J Hydrol Eng (2008):1–9

  13. Teomete E (2016) The effect of temperature and moisture on electrical resistance, strain sensitivity and crack sensitivity of steel fiber reinforced smart cement composite. Smart Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/7/075024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun M, Li Z, Liu Q, Tang Z, Shen D (2000) A study on thermal self-diagnostic and self-adaptive smart concrete structures. Cem Concr Res 30(8):1251–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00284-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schleiting M, Wetzel A, Krooß P, Thiemicke J, Niendorf T, Middendorf B, Fehling E (2020) Functional microfibre reinforced ultra-high performance concrete (FMF-UHPC). Cem Concr Res 130:105993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.105993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Howser RN, Dhonde HB, Mo YL (2011) Self-sensing of carbon nanofiber concrete columns subjected to reversed cyclic loading. Smart Mater Struct 20:085031. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/20/8/085031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balberg I (1985) Universal percolation-threshold limits in the continuum. Phys Rev B Condens Matter 31(6):4053–4055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Celzard A, McRae E, Deleuze C, Dufort M, Furdin G, Marêché JF (1996) Critical concentration in percolating systems containing a high-aspect-ratio filler. Phys Rev B 53(10):6209–6214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berhan L, Sastry AM (2007) Modeling percolation in high-aspect-ratio fiber systems. I. Soft-core versus hard-core models. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 75(4):041120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Double percolation in the electrical conduction in carbon fiber reinforced cement-based materials. Carbon 45(2):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garboczi EJ, Schwartz LM, Bentz DP (1995) Modeling the influence of the interfacial zone on the DC electrical conductivity of mortar. Adv Cem Based Mater 2(5):169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baeza FJ, Chung DDL, Zornoza E, Andión LG, Garcés P (2010) Triple percolation in concrete reinforced with carbon fiber. ACI Mater J 107(4):396–402

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chen B, Wu K, Yao W (2004) Conductivity of carbon fiber reinforced cement-based composites. Cem Concr Compos 26(4):291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Celzard A (1995) Contribution à l’étude du phénomène de percolation dans des matériaux composites à propriétés anisotropes. Thesis, Nancy 1

  25. Brouers F (1986) Percolation threshold and conductivity in metal-insulator composite mean-field theories. J Phys C Solid State Phys 19(36):7183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Balberg I (1987) Tunneling and nonuniversal conductivity in composite materials. Phys Rev Lett 59:1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Carmona F, Barreau F, Delhaes P, Canet R (1980) An experimental model for studying the effect of anisotropy on percolative conduction. J Phys Lett 41(22):531–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Helsing J, Helte A (1991) Effective conductivity of aggregates of anisotropic grains. J Appl Phys 69(6):3583–3588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Charlaix E, Guyon E, Rivier N (1984) A criterion for percolation threshold in a random array of plates. Solid State Commun 50(11):999–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Balberg I, Anderson CH, Alexander S, Wagner N (1984) Excluded volume and its relation to the onset of percolation. Phys Rev B 30(7):3933–3943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Balberg I (1985) Universal percolation-threshold limits in the continuum. Phys Rev B 31(6):4053–4055

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Charlaix E (1986) Percolation threshold of a random array of discs: a numerical simulation. J Phys A Math Gen 19(9):L533–L536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Balberg I (1986) Excluded-volume explanation of Archie’s law. Phys Rev B 33(5):3618–3620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Neda Z, Florian R, Brechet Y (1999) Reconsideration of continuum percolation of isotropically oriented sticks in three dimensions. Phys Rev E 59(3):3717–3719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu J, Zhong W, Yao W (2010) Modeling of conductivity in carbon fiber-reinforced cement-based composite. J Mater Sci 45(13):3538–3546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rajabipour F (2006) Insitu electrical sensing and material health monitoring in concrete structures. Theses and dissertations. Available from ProQuest, pp 1–193

  37. McLachlan DS, Blaszkiewicz M, Newnham RE (1990) Electrical resistivity of composites. J Am Ceram Soc 73(8):2187–2203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sun M, Li Z, Mao Q, Shen D (1998) Study on the hole conduction phenomenon in carbon fiber-reinforced concrete. Cem Concr Res 28(4):549–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00011-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Torrents JM, Mason TO, Garboczi EJ (2000) Impedance spectra of fiber-reinforced cement-based composites: a modeling approach. Cem Concr Res 30(4):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Han B, Ding S, Yu X (2015) Intrinsic self-sensing concrete and structures: a review. Measurement 59:110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.09.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xie P, Gu P, Beaudoin JJ (1996) Electrical percolation phenomena in cement composites containing conductive fibers. J Mater Sci 31:4093–4097. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00352673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ford SJ, Shane JD, Mason TO (1998) Assignment of features in impedance spectra of the cement-paste/steel system. Cem Concr Res 28(12):1737–1751. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00156-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Christensen BJ, Coverdale T, Olson RA, Ford SJ, Garboczi EJ, Jennings HM, Mason TO (1994) Impedance spectroscopy of hydrating cement-based materials: measurement, interpretation, and application. J Am Ceram Soc 77:2789–2804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04507.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McCarter WJ, Starrs G, Chrisp TM, Banfill PFG (2009) Complex impedance and dielectric dispersion in carbon fiber reinforced cement matrices. J Am Ceram Soc 92:1617–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03057.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Belli A, Mobili A, Bellezze T, Tittarelli F (2020) Commercial and recycled carbon/steel fibers for fiber-reinforced cement mortars with high electrical conductivity. Cem Concr Compos 109:103569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Woo LY, Wansom S, Ozyurt N, Mu B, Shah SP, Mason TO (2005) Characterizing fiber dispersion in cement composites using AC-impedance spectroscopy. Cem Concr Compos 27(6):627–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Garboczi EJ (1990) Permeability, diffusivity, and microstructural parameters: a critical review. Cem Concr Res 20(4):591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rajabipour F, Weiss J (2007) Electrical conductivity of drying cement paste. Mater Struct 40(10):1143–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Xie P, Gu P, Xu Z, Beaudoin JJ (1993) A rationalized a.c. impedance model for microstructural characterization of hydrating cement systems. Cem Concr Res 23(2):359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Torrents J, Mason T, Garboczi E. Impedance spectra of fiber-reinforced cement-based composites: a modeling approach. Kopernio. Library Catalog: kopernio.com

  51. Winslow DN, Cohen MD, Bentz DP, Snyder KA, Garboczi EJ (1994) Percolation and pore structure in mortars and concrete. Cem Concr Res 24(1):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Andreotti B, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2011) Les milieux granulaires. Library Catalog

  53. Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Double percolation in the electrical conduction in carbon fiber reinforced cement-based materials. Carbon 45:263–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hamza A, François D, Jean-Pierre C, Sofiane A, Yves B (2020) Carbon-fibred mortar: Effect of sand content and grain size distribution on electrical impedance. In: Proceedings of 2020 session of the 13th Fib international PhD symposium in civil engineering, pp 296–303

Download references

Acknowledgements

The measures at 1 kHz were previously presented during the 13th Fib international symposium in civil engineering [54].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing—Original Draft. FD: Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing—review. SA: Conceptualization, Validation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing—review and editing. YB: Validation, Supervision—review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Allam.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Coefficient of variation of results

Appendix: Coefficient of variation of results

For every formulation, 3 specimens are prepared. The electrical behavior of every specimen is measured between 4 Hz and 1 MHz (200 measurement frequencies). The coefficient variation at every frequency is calculated based on the following equation:

$$\overline{X} = \frac{1}{n}\sum x_{i}$$
(23)
$${\varvec{\sigma}} = \frac{1}{{\varvec{n}}}{\varvec{\varSigma}}({\varvec{x}}_{{\varvec{i}}} - \overline{\user2{X}})^{2}$$
(24)
$${\varvec{c}}_{{\varvec{v}}} = {\varvec{\sigma}}/\overline{\user2{X}}$$
(25)

The coefficient of variation presented in the following tables are the mean value of the 200 coefficient of variation calculated for the 200 measurement frequencies (Tables

Table 5 Coefficient of variation of electrical measurements in mortar containing standard sand

5,

Table 6 Coefficient of variation of electrical measurements in mortar containing fine sand

6).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allam, H., Duplan, F., Amziane, S. et al. Carbon fibers' percolation in smart cementitious materials considering sand characteristics. Mater Struct 56, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02187-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02187-9

Keywords

Navigation