Skip to main content
Log in

Flexural ductility of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams with maximum reinforcement ratios

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams with maximum reinforcement ratio, several reinforced concrete sections with different rebars are designed and analyzed using OpenSees. It was found that, although reasonable for rebars with yield point, the determination of the relative depth of the rectangular stress block for balanced failure given in the Chinese Concrete Code (GB50010-2010) is somewhat small for rebars without yield point. Based on the American Concrete Code (ACI318-19) and the work of previous scholars, this paper proposes a more accurate calculation method for the relative depth of the rectangular stress block for balanced failure based on the requirement of a conservative bearing capacity, and further extends it to prestressed medium strength rebars. Two reinforced concrete beams and one prestressed concrete beam were designed and tested with the proposed maximum reinforcement ratios. The outcomes demonstrate the validity of the proposed formula.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request

References

  1. Al-Osta M, Isa M, Baluch M, Rahman M (2017) Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete. Constr Build Mater 134:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cao X, Feng D, Wang Z, Wu G (2022) Parametric investigation of the assembled bolt-connected buckling-restrained brace and performance evaluation of its application into structural retrofit. J Build Eng 48:103988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Q, Chen Y, Feng J (2021) Equivalent analytical modeling of adequate reinforcement noncontact lap splices under monotonic loads. Struct Concr 22(2):593–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Q, Wang S, Meloni M, Feng J, Xu J, Cai J (2021) Experimental study on seismic behavior of precast beam-column connections under cyclic loading. Struct Concr 22(3):1315–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernardo L, Lopes S (2003) Flexural ductility of high-strength concrete beams. Struct Concr 4(3):135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernardo L, Lopes S (2004) Neutral axis depth versus flexural ductility in high-strength concrete beams. J Struct Eng 130(3):452–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murthy AR, Karihaloo B, Priya DS (2018) Flexural behavior of RC beams retrofitted with ultra-high strength concrete. Const Build Mater 175:815–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng Y, Li Z, Zhang H, Corigliano A, Lam AC, Hansapinyo C, Yan Z (2021) Experimental and analytical investigation on flexural behaviour of RC beams strengthened with NSM CFRP prestressed concrete prisms. Compos Struct 257:113385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdallah M, Al Mahmoud F, Khelil A, Mercier J, Almassri B (2020) Assessment of the flexural behavior of continuous RC beams strengthened with NSM-FRP bars, experimental and analytical study. Compos Struct 242:112127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang L, Zhang C, Yan L, Kasal B (2018) Flexural behavior of u-shape FRP profile-RC composite beams with inner GFRP tube confinement at concrete compression zone. Compos Struct 184:674–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim HS, Shin YS (2011) Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams retrofitted with hybrid fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs) under sustaining loads. Compos Struct 93(2):802–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Safdar M, Matsumoto T, Kakuma K (2016) Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams repaired with ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Compos Struct 157:448–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sahoo DR, Solanki A, Kumar A (2015) Influence of steel and polypropylene fibers on flexural behavior of RC beams. J Mater Civil Eng 27(8):04014232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato R, Maruyama I, Sogabe T, Sogo M (2007) Flexural behavior of reinforced recycled concrete beams. J Adv Concr Technol 5(1):43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sneed LH, Verre S, Carloni C, Ombres L (2016) Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with steel-FRCM composite. Eng Struct 127:686–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashour SA, Wafa FF, Kamal MI (2000) Effect of the concrete compressive strength and tensile reinforcement ratio on the flexural behavior of fibrous concrete beams. Eng Struct 22(9):1145–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deluce JR, Vecchio FJ (2013) Cracking behavior of steel fiber-reinforced concrete members containing conventional reinforcement. ACI Struct J 110(3):481–490

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dancygier A, Savir Z (2006) Flexural behavior of HSFRC with low reinforcement ratios. Eng Struct 28(11):1503–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dancygier AN, Berkover E (2016) Cracking localization and reduced ductility in fiber-reinforced concrete beams with low reinforcement ratios. Eng Struct 111:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoo D-Y, Moon D-Y (2018) Effect of steel fibers on the flexural behavior of RC beams with very low reinforcement ratios. Constr Build Mater 188:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwan A, Ho J, Pam H (2002) Flexural strength and ductility of reinforced concrete beams. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Struct Build 152(4):361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pam H, Kwan A, Islam M (2001) Flexural strength and ductility of reinforced normal-and high-strength concrete beams. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Struct Build 146(4):381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duthinh D, Starnes M (2004) Strength and ductility of concrete beams reinforced with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer plates and steel. J Compos Constr 8(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rashid M, Mansur M (2005) Reinforced high-strength concrete beams in flexure. ACI Struct J 102(3):462–471

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arslan G, Cihanli E (2010) Curvature ductility prediction of reinforced high-strength concrete beam sections. J Civil Eng Manag 16(4):462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Naaman A, Jeong M (1995) Structural ductility of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons. In: Non-Metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for concrete structures: proceedings of the second international RILEM symposium, Vol. 29, CRC Press, pp 379–386

  27. Chandrasekaran S, Nunziante L, Serino G, Carannante F (2011) Curvature ductility of RC sections based on Eurocode: analytical procedure. KSCE J Civil Eng 15(1):131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vijay P, GangaRao HV (2001) Bending behavior and deformability of glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete members. ACI Struct J 98(6):834–842

    Google Scholar 

  29. MOHURD (2010) Code for design of concrete structures (GB50010-2010), China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

  30. Filippou FC, Popov EP, Bertero VV (1983) Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints, Tech. Rep. Report EERC 83-19, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley

  31. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, OpenSees command language manual (2006)

  32. Kent DC, Park R (1971) Flexural members with confined concrete. J Struct Div 97(7):1969–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ACI Committee 318 (2019) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-19) and commentary, American Concrete Institute

  34. MOHURD (2007) Steel for reinforced concrete-Part 2: hot rolled ribbed steel bars (GB1499.2-2007), China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing

  35. Shahrooz BM, Miller RA, Harries KA, Russell HG (2011) Design of concrete structures using high-strength steel reinforcement, Tech. Rep. NCHRP REPORT 679, Transportation Research Board

  36. Cheng W (1982) Sectional moment-curvature analysis of concrete flexural members reinforced by steels of no definite yielding point. China Civil Eng J 15(4):1–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this article was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFB3802000), Key National Industrial Technology Research and Development Cooperation Projects (BZ2021036), Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (SJKY19_0091), Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (YBPY2016) and the China Scholarship Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Cai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Derivation of the relationship between \(\xi\) and \(\varepsilon _{\rm{s}}^0\)

Assume that the measured strain of the steel bar at the time of failure is \(\varepsilon _{\rm{s}}^0\). The superscript \(^0\) is used below to indicate the measured value of the parameter.

Based on the plane-section assumption, the measured relative depth of the rectangular stress block \(\xi\) can be calculated as

$$\begin{aligned} \xi ^0 = \frac{\beta _1}{{1 + \frac{{\varepsilon _{\rm{{s}}}^{{0}}}}{{{\varepsilon _{{{\rm{cu}}}}}}}}} \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

The equilibrium equations based on the design and measured values can be obtained as

$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} f_{\rm{y}}A_{\rm{s}}=\alpha _1f_{\rm{c}}b\xi {h_0} \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)
$$\begin{aligned}{} & {} f_{\rm{s}}^0A_{\rm{s}}=\alpha _1f_{\rm{c}}^0b\xi ^0{h_0} \end{aligned}$$
(A.3)

Substituting Eq. (A.3) into Eq. (A.2) leads to

$$\begin{aligned} {\xi } = \frac{{{f_{\rm{y}}}}}{{f_{\rm{{s}}}^{{0}}}}\frac{{f_{\rm{c}}^{{0}}}}{{{f_{\rm{c}}}}}\xi ^0 \end{aligned}$$
(A.4)

Equation(A.4) can also be rewritten with the assumption \(f_{\rm{c}}^0=f_{ck}\)

$$\begin{aligned} {\xi } = \frac{{{f_{\rm{y}}}}}{{f_{\rm{{s}}}^{{0}}}}\frac{{{f_{\rm{{ck}}}}}}{{{f_{\rm{c}}}}}\xi ^0 \end{aligned}$$
(A.5)

Substituting Eqs. (A.1) into (A.5), we can obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \xi = \frac{{\frac{{{f_\mathrm{{y}}}{f_{\mathrm{{ck}}}}}}{{f_\mathrm{{s}}^\mathrm{{0}}{f_\mathrm{{c}}}}}{\beta _1}}}{{1 + \frac{{\varepsilon _\mathrm{{s}}^\mathrm{{0}}}}{{{\varepsilon _{\mathrm{{\rm{cu}}}}}}}}} \end{aligned}$$
(A.6)

In the ultimate state of bearing capacity, the real limit curvature of the section and the ductility increase with the real strain of the rebar. Moreover, if \(\xi\) has been determined, then the rebar strain \(\varepsilon _{\rm{s}}^0\) at the time of failure can be derived as

$$\begin{aligned} \varepsilon _{\rm{s}}^0=\left( {\frac{f_{\rm{y}}f_{ck}}{f_{\rm{s}}^0f_{\rm{c}}}\beta _1}-\xi \right) \frac{\varepsilon _{\rm{cu}}}{\xi } \end{aligned}$$
(A.7)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., De Corte, W., Wang, C. et al. Flexural ductility of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams with maximum reinforcement ratios. Mater Struct 56, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02092-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-02092-7

Keywords

Navigation