Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM)-confined masonry columns

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strengthening is a valid measure for improving the mechanical performance of unreinforced masonry (URM) structures. Fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) is effectively compatible with masonry materials due to the use of an inorganic matrix. Therefore, FRCM boasts extensive application prospects in strengthening URM structures. Nevertheless, further research still needs to be conducted on the compressive performance of FRCM-confined masonry columns. In this paper, the uniaxial compressive test results of seventy-five FRCM-confined masonry columns were collected from the available literature. Two existing prediction models of the compressive strength of FRCM-confined masonry columns were adopted, and a model was also proposed based on the regression analysis of the collected data. The prediction accuracies of the three models were compared and analyzed, and the characteristic values of the compressive strength of FRCM-confined masonry columns were further obtained via a probabilistic method. These research results can be used to guide the compressive strength design of FRCM-confined masonry columns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Valluzzi MR, Modena C, Felice G (2014) Current practice and open issues in strengthening historical buildings with composites. Mater Struct 47(12):1971–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amato G, Chen JF, D’Anna J, La Mendola L, Minafò G (2017) FRCM systems for strengthening masonry structures. In: proceedings of the 8th biennial conference on advanced composites in construction, pp 244–249

  3. Indirli MS, Kouris LA, Formisano A, Borg RP, Mazzolani F (2013) Seismic damage assessment of unreinforced masonry structures after the Abruzzo 2009 earthquake: the case study of the historical centers of L’Aquila and Castelvecchio Subequo. Int J Arch Herit 7(5):536–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Penna A, Morandi P, Rota M, Manzini CF, Porto F et al (2014) Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12(5):2255–2273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun BT, Zhao HS, Yan PL (2017) The influence of construction measurement and structure storey on seismic performance of masonry structure. In: 2nd International conference on materials science, energy technology and environmental engineering, vol 81, pp 012135

  6. Maras MM, Kilinc HC (2016) Comparison on repair and strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry structures. J Eng Res Appl 6(11):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao J, Sun WB, Yong HB, Zhu QQ (2014) Review of the study on the FRP strengthened masonry walls. Adv Mater Res 919–921(3):430–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dizhur D, Bailey S, Griffith M, Ingham J (2015) Earthquake performance of two vintage URM buildings retrofitted using surface bonded GFRP: case study. J Compos Constr 19(5):05015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parghi M, Alam MS (2018) A review on the application of sprayed-FRP composites for strengthening of concrete and masonry structures in the construction sector. Compos Struct 187:518–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kouris LAS, Triantafillou TC (2018) State-of-the-art on strengthening of masonry structures with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Constr Build Mater 188:1221–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin SP, Jing L, Yin MT, Wang B (2019) Mechanical properties of textile reinforced concrete under chloride wet-dry and freeze-thaw cycle environments. Cement Concr Compos 96:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papanicolaou CG, Triantafillou TC, Karlos K, Papathanasiou M (2007) Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading. Mater Struct 40(10):1081–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Augenti N, Parisi F, Prota A, Manfredi G (2011) In-plane lateral response of a full-scale masonry subassemblage with and without an inorganic matrix-grid strengthening system. J Compos Constr 15(4):578–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cascardi A, Longo F, Micelli F, Aiello MA (2017) Compressive strength of confined column with Fiber Reinforced Mortar (FRM): new design-oriented-models. Constr Build Mater 156:387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carozzi FG, Bellini A, D’Antino T, Felice G, Focacci F et al (2017) Experimental investigation of tensile and bond properties of Carbon-FRCM composites for strengthening masonry elements. Compos B Eng 128:100–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leone M, Aiello MA, Balsamo A, Carozzi FG, Ceroni F et al (2017) Glass fabric reinforced cementitious matrix: tensile properties and bond performance on masonry substrate. Compos B Eng 127:196–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lignola GP, Caggegi C, Ceroni F, Santis SD, Krajewski P et al (2017) Performance assessment of basalt FRCM for retrofit applications on masonry. Compos B Eng 128:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caggegi C, Carozzi FG, Santis SD, Fabbrocino F, Focacci F et al (2017) Experimental analysis on tensile and bond properties of PBO and aramid fabric reinforced cementitious matrix for strengthening masonry structures. Compos B Eng 127:175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Santis S, Ceroni F, Felice GD, Fagone M, Ghiassi B et al (2017) Round robin test on tensile and bond behaviour of steel reinforced grout systems. Compos Part B Eng 127:100–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Parisi F, Iovinella I, Balsamo A, Augenti N, Prota A (2013) In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix–grid composites. Compos B Eng 45(1):1657–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Babaeidarabad S, Caso FD, Nanni A (2014) URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite subjected to diagonal compression. J Compos Constr 18(2):04013045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Babaeidarabad S, Caso FD, Nanni A (2015) Out-of-plane behavior of URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite. J Compos Constr 18(4):04013057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bui TL, Larbi AS, Reboul N, Ferrier E (2015) Shear behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by external bonded FRP and TRC. Compos Struct 132:923–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martins A, Vasconcelos G, Fangueiro R, Cunha F (2015) Experimental assessment of an innovative strengthening material for brick masonry infills. Compos B Eng 80:328–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sagar SL, Singhal V, Rai DC, Gudur P (2017) Diagonal shear and out-of-plane flexural strength of fabric reinforced cementitious matrix strengthened masonry walletes. J Compos Constr 21(4):04017016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marcari G, Basili M, Vestroni F (2017) Experimental investigation of tuff masonry panels reinforced with surface bonded basalt textile-reinforced mortar. Compos B Eng 108:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ismail N, El-Maaddawy T, Khattak N, Najmal A (2018) In-plane shear strength improvement of hollow Concrete masonry panels using a fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix. J Compos Constr 22(2):04018004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Garmendia L, San-Jose JT, Garcia D, Larrinaga P (2011) Rehabilitation of masonry arches with compatible advanced composite material. Constr Build Mater 25(12):4374–4385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Giamundo V, Lignola GP, Maddaloni G, Balsam A, Prota A, Manfredi G (2015) Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements. Compos B Eng 70:53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carozzi FG, Poggi C, Bertolesi E, Milani G (2018) Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM SRG and FRP composites: experimental evaluation. Compos Struct 187:466–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De Santis S, Roscini F, de Felice G (2018) Full-scale tests on masonry vaults strengthened with Steel Reinforced Grout. Compos Part B Eng 141:20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maddaloni G, Cascardi A, Balsamo A, Di Ludovico M, Micelli F et al (2017) Confinement of full-scale masonry columns with FRCM systems. Key Eng Mater 747:347–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Di Ludovico M, Cascardi A, Balsamo A, Aiello MA (2020) Uniaxial experimental tests on full-scale limestone masonry columns confined with glass and basalt FRCM systems. J Compos Constr 24(5):04020050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mezrea PE, Yilmaz IA, Ispir M, Binbir E, Bal IE et al (2017) External jacketing of unreinforced historical masonry piers with open-grid basalt-reinforced mortar. J Compos Constr 21(3):04016110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fossetti M, Minafò G (2017) Comparative experimental analysis on the compressive behaviour of masonry columns strengthened by FRP BFRCM or steel wires. Compos Part B Eng 112:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Santandrea M, Quartarone G, Carloni C, Gu XL (2017) Confinement of masonry columns with steel and basalt FRCM composites. Key Eng Mater 747:342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Balsamo A, Cascardi A, Di Ludovico M, Aiello MA, Morandini G (2018) Analytical study on the effectiveness of the FRCM-confinement of masonry columns, In: Construction pathology, rehabilitation, technology and heritage management, pp 1–9

  38. Cascardi A, Micelli F, Aiello MA (2018) FRCM-confined masonry columns: experimental investigation on the effect of the inorganic matrix properties. Constr Build Mater 186:811–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Minafò G, Mendola LL (2018) Experimental investigation on the effect of mortar grade on the compressive behaviour of FRCM confined masonry columns. Compos B Eng 146:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cascardi A, Aiello MA, Triantafillou T (2017) Analysis-oriented model for concrete and masonry confined with fiber reinforced mortar. Mater Struct 50(4):202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Micelli F, Maddaloni G, Longo F, Prota A (2021) Axial stress-strain model for FRCM confinement of masonry columns. J Compos Constr 25(1):04020078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Theofanis KD (2019) Experimental study on carbon fiber textile reinforced mortar system as a means for confinement of masonry columns. Constr Build Mater 208:723–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang JY, Wan CL, Zeng Q, Shen LH, Malik MA (2020) Effect of eccentricity on retrofitting efficiency of basalt textile reinforced concrete on partially damaged masonry columns. Compos Struct 232:111585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. CNR-DT 215 (2018) Istruzioni per la Progettazione, l'Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Interventi di Consolidamento Statico mediante l'utilizzo di Compositi Fibrorinforzati a Matrice Inorganica. https://www.cnr.it/it/node/9347

  45. Ombres L (2014) Confinement effectiveness in eccentrically loaded masonry columns strengthened by fiber reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) jackets. Key Eng Mater 624:551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Incerti A, Vasiliu A, Ferracuti B, Mazzotti C (2015) Uniaxial compressive tests on masonry columns confined by FRP and FRCM. In: Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on fiber reinforced polymers for reinforced concrete structures & the 5th Asia-Pacific conference on fiber reinforced polymers in structures, Nanjing, China

  47. Carloni C, Mazzotti C, Savoia M, Subramaniam K (2015) Confinement of masonry columns with PBO FRCM composites. Key Eng Mater 624:644–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Witzany J, Zigler R (2016) Stress state analysis and failure mechanisms of masonry columns reinforced with FRP under concentric compressive load. Polymers 8:176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Theofanis KD (2015) Textile reinforced mortar system as a means for confinement of masonry structures. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on mechanics and materials in design, pp 1775–1788

  50. Sneed LH, Carloni C, Baietti G, Fraioli G (2017) Confinement of clay masonry columns with SRG. Key Eng Mater 747:350–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yilmaz IA, Mezrea PE, Ispir M, Binbir E, Bal IE, Ilki A (2013) External confinement of brick masonry columns with open grid basalt reinforced mortar. In: Proceedings of the fourth Asia-Pacific conference on FRP in structures (APFIS 2013), Melbourne, Australia

  52. Monti G, Alessandri S, Santini S (2009) Design by testing: a procedure for the statistical determination of capacity models. Constr Build Mater 23(4):1487–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (JZ-029). The supports from the China Scholarship Council and the University of Western Australia are sincerely acknowledged by Lei Jing. Many test results from different researchers are collected in this study. These contributions are appreciated by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiping Yin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jing, L., Yin, S. & Aslani, F. Statistical analysis of the compressive strength of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM)-confined masonry columns. Mater Struct 54, 122 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01715-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01715-9

Keywords

Navigation