Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thermal conductivity and strength of foamed gypsum formulated using aluminum sulfate and sodium bicarbonate as gas-producing additives

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work aimed to explore the potential of using Al2(SO4)3 and NaHCO3 as gas-producing additives for the formation of foamed gypsum. Three systems of additives, namely Al2(SO4)3 + CaCO3, Al2(SO4)3 + citric acid, and NaHCO3, were investigated for their foam-forming ability in order to lower the thermal conductivity while preserving the compressive strength of the foamed gypsum. Emphasis was given to the setting time such that it would lie within 20–25 min, for the formulation to be practically useful. The results showed that, within the desired setting time, NaHCO3 provided the lowest thermal conductivity (~0.22 W/mK) and the highest efficiency (i.e., the highest rate of the thermal conductivity reduction for each percent of additives) among the three systems studied. It was also the system that best preserved the compressive strength for every unit reduction in the thermal conductivity. However, the corresponding compressive strength of 0.72 MPa was still very low, about three times lower than that of the other systems. The Al2(SO4)3 + CaCO3 system yielded a lower thermal conductivity (~0.24 W/mK) than the Al2(SO4)3 + citric system (~0.31 W/mK), although their corresponding compressive strengths (~2.4 MPa) were quite similar. Therefore, given the desired setting time, the Al2(SO4)3 + CaCO3 system produced the best combination of thermal conductivity and compressive strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.nesdb.go.th/portals/0/news/journal/eco_journal/04-10_2550/74.pdf. Accessed 15 April 2014

  2. Skujans J, Vulans A, Iljins U, Aboltins A (2007) Measurements of heat transfer of multi-layered wall construction with foam gypsum. Appl Thermal Eng 27:1219–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Demir I, Serhat Baspinar M (2008) Effect of silica fume and expanded perlite addition on the technical properties of the fly ash-lime-gypsum mixture. Constr Build Mater 22:1299–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Serhat Baspinar M, Kahraman E (2011) Modifications in the properties of gypsum construction element via addition of expanded macroporous silica granules. Constr Build Mater 25:3327–3333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutierrez-Gonzalez S, Gadea J, Rodriguez A, Junco C, Calderon V (2012) Lightweight plaster materials with enhanced thermal properties made with polyurethane foam wastes. Constr Build Mater 28:653–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chindaprasert P, Boonserm K, Chairuangsri T, Vichit-Vadakan W, Eaimsin T, Sato T (2011) Plaster materials from waste calcium containing chemicals, organic fibers and inorganic additives. Constr Build Mater 25:3193–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li G, Yu Y, Zhao Z, Li J, Li C (2003) Properties study of cotton stalk fiber/gypsum composite. Cem Concr Res 33:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang H, Xu Q, Zhao Z, Zhang J, Sun Y, Sun L, Xu F, Sawada Y (2012) Preparation and thermal performance of gypsum boards incorporated with microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal regulation. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 102:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Su JF, Wang XY, Wang SB, Zhao YH, Huang Z (2012) Fabrication and properties of microencapsulated-paraffin/gypsum-matrix building materials for thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 55:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colak A (2000) Density and strength characteristics of foamed gypsum. Cem Concr Compos 22:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vimmrova A, Keppert M, Svoboda L, Cerny R (2011) Lightweight gypsum composites: design strategies for multi-functionality. Cem Concr Compos 33:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubio-Avalos JC, Manzano-Ramirez A, Yanez-Limon JM, Contreras-Garcia ME, Alonso-Guzman EM, Gonzalez-Hernandez J (2005) Development and characterization of an inorganic foam obtained by using sodium bicarbonate as a gas generator. Constr Build Mater 19:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyri H, Brandle K, Muller M, Heine H (1977) Production of porous gypsum moldings. U.S. Patent 4040850

  14. Bazelova Z, Pach L, Lokaj J (2010) The effect of surface active substance concentration on the properties of foamed and non-foamed gypsum. Ceramics 54(4):379–385

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arikan M, Sobolev K (2002) The optimization of a gypsum-based composite material. Cem Concr Res 32:1725–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Singh M, Garg M (1997) Retarding action of various chemicals on setting and hardening characteristics of gypsum plaster at different pH. Cem Concr Res 27(6):947–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Badens E, Veesler S, Boistelle R (1999) Crystallization of gypsum from hemihydrate in presence of additives. J Cryst Growth 198(199):704–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magallanes-Rivera RX, Escalante-Garcia JI, Gorokhovsky A (2009) Hydration reactions and microstructural characteristics of hemihydrate with citric and malic acid. Constr Build Mater 23:1298–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Metal and Materials Technology Center, Thailand, under Grant no. P1200971.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Wansom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Umponpanarat, P., Wansom, S. Thermal conductivity and strength of foamed gypsum formulated using aluminum sulfate and sodium bicarbonate as gas-producing additives. Mater Struct 49, 1115–1126 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0562-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0562-1

Keywords

Navigation