Skip to main content
Log in

Testing of blister propagation and peeling of orthotropic bituminous waterproofing membranes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bridge decks are commonly subjected to harsh environmental conditions that often lead to serious corrosion problems, which are triggered by blisters under the hot mix asphalt bridge deck pavement with waterproofing membranes. These blisters are secretly evolving during weather exposure until often being detected too late. Formation of blisters under the waterproofing membrane is caused by a complex mechanism governed by bottom–up pressure and loss of adhesion. This paper primarily intends to adopt the analytical blister propagation energy approach for waterproofing membranes and compare it with adhesive fracture energy from standard peeling test methods, already described in the literature. Three different types of polymer modified bitumen membranes (PBM) were used for this purpose. The investigation includes a comparison between uniaxial and biaxial testing conditions for determining the modulus of elasticity of the membranes. Moreover, the influence of the displacement rate and temperature on the adhesive fracture energy in peeling tests is investigated. It was found that the biaxial modulus of PBM in the longitudinal and transversal direction is comparable with the uniaxial tension testing results in the main directions. In addition, it was observed that the ratio of longitudinal and transversal modulus of elasticity was similar. The energy calculated from tests with elliptical blister propagation showed a comparable value to the standard peeling fracture energy for similar types of PBM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hailesilassie BW, Partl MN (2012) Mechanisms of asphalt blistering on concrete bridges. J ASTM Int 9. doi:10.1520/JAI104135

  2. Partl MN, Gubler R, Hean S (2001) Belagsschäden infolge Blasenbildung auf einer neuen Hängebrücke in Hongkong. In: Muster W, Schläpfer Herausgeber K (eds) Nachhaltige Material- und Systemtechnik. EMPA, Dübendorf, pp 337–343

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hean S, Partl MN (2006) Determination of the decisive factors influencing the behaviour of bridge waterproofing systems with polymer–bitumen membranes. Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications, Bern, p 597

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenberg J (2000) Thin pavements with synthetic binder used in Denmark. Asphalt De., Danish Road Institute, Roskilde

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hean S, Partl MN (2003) Mastic asphalt and waterproofing components for bridge and tunnel construction. Presented at the proceedings of 12th int. flexible pavements conference, Melbourne

  6. Partl MN (2004) Deterioration mechanisms in polymer-modified bitumen’s water proofing membrane sheets during torching. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology, Duebendorf, p 577

    Google Scholar 

  7. Architekten-Verein SI (1999) Prüfungen und anwendungsgebite polymerbitumen-dichtungsbahnen-schälzugprüfungen, vol SIA 281/2, SN 564 281/2, ed. Zurich

  8. Architekten-Verein SI (1999) Bitumenhahnen-haftzugprüfung, vol SIA 281/3, SN 564 281/3, ed. Zurich

  9. Galliot C, Luchsinger RH (2011) Uniaxial and biaxial mechanical properties of ETFE foils. Polym Test 30:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kinloch AJ, Lau CC, Williams JG (1994) The peeling of flexible laminates. Int J Fract 66:45–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore DR, Williams JG (2001) Peel testing of flexible laminates. Fract Mech Test Methods Polym Adhes Compos 28:203–223

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blackman BRK, Hadvinia H, Kinloch AJ, Williams JG (2003) The use of a cohesive zone model to study the fracture of fiber composites and adhesively-bonded joints. Int J Fract 119:25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadavinia H, Kawashita L, Kinloch AJ, Moore DR, Williams JG (2006) A numerical analysis of the elastic–plastic peel test. Eng Fract Mech 73:2324–2335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hailesilassie BW, Partl MN (2013) Adhesive blister propagation under an orthotropic bituminous waterproofing membrane. Constr Build Mater (accepted manuscript and under review in Elsevier Editorial system)

  15. Georgiou I, Hadavinia H, Ivankovic A, Kinloch AJ, Tropsa V, Williams JG (2003) Cohesive zone models and the plastically deforming peel test. J Adhes 79:239–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams JG, Hadavinia H (2001) Analytical solutions for cohesive zone models. J Mech Phys Solids 50:809–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fini EH, Al-Qadi IL (2011) Development of a pressurized blister test for interface characterization of aggregate highly polymerized bituminous materials. J Mater Civ Eng 23:656–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Hemelrijck D, Ramault C, Makris A, Clarke A, Williamson C (2007) Biaxial testing of fiber reinforced composites. Presented at the 16th international conference on composite materials, Kyoto

  19. Galliot C, Luchsinger RH (2009) A simple model describing the non-linear biaxial tensile behaviour of PVC-coated polyester fabrics for use in the finite element analysis. Compos Struct 90:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reese S, Raible T, Wriggers P (2001) Finite element modeling of orthotropic material behaviour in pneumatic membranes. Int J Solid Struct 38:9525–9544

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nase M, Lange B, Grellmann W (2008) Fracture mechanics on polyethylene/polybutene-1 peel films. Polym Test 27:1017–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schweizer Norm (1999) Polymerbitumen-Dichtungsbahnen Schälzugprüfungen, vol 281/2, ed. swiss, Schweizerischer Ingenieur- und Architekten-Verein

  23. Kim K-S, Aravas N (1988) Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test. Int J Solids Struct 24:417–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hohlfelder RJ (1999) Bulge and blister testing of the films and their interfaces. Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford

  25. Kai-Tak W, Yiu-Wing M (1995) Fracture mechanics of a new blister test with stable crack growth. Acta Metall Mater 43:4109–4115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Robert JH, William DN, Huihong L, Christopher EDC (1999) Blister test analysis methods. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 356:585–590

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledges the support of colleges Kienast Hans and Kato Hiroyuki, Road Engineering/Sealing Components, EMPA (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Science and Technology) including other group members of the Lab. and C. Galliot, Center for Synergetic Structures, EMPA, for his many interactions throughout the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biruk W. Hailesilassie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hailesilassie, B.W., Hean, S. & Partl, M.N. Testing of blister propagation and peeling of orthotropic bituminous waterproofing membranes. Mater Struct 48, 1095–1108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0217-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0217-z

Keywords

Navigation