Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of the asphalt mixture morphology influence on its ageing susceptibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the influence that asphalt mixture morphology aspects have on its overall ageing behavior. Since mixture morphology is controllable, having insight into how the various morphological parameters influence the mixture’s long-term behavior can be of great value to optimize its design, regardless of the individual material properties. To do so, this study is utilizing a new framework to characterize the combined effect of aggregate packing, average air void size, porosity and level of compaction on ageing for a large set of data from different sources of field compacted and laboratory produced asphalt mixtures. The paper also hypothesizes about the mechanisms that lay behind the found influences and how thus mixture design improvements can be made. From all the investigated cases, it was found that the framework can be used to optimize the durability performance of asphalt mixtures. It was also observed that prediction of ageing behavior without considering the influence of mixture morphology may lead to erroneous conclusions and non-optimal mix design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petersen J, Harnsberger P (1998) Asphalt aging: dual oxidation mechanism and its interrelationships with asphalt composition and oxidative age hardening. Transp Res Rec 1638(1):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lu X, Isacsson U (2002) Effect of ageing on bitumen chemistry and rheology. Constr Build Mater 16(1):15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuller WB, Thompson SE (1907) The laws of proportioning concrete. Trans Am Soc Civil Eng 59:67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wig RJ, Williams CM, Gates ER (1916) Strength and other properties of concrete as affected by materials and methods of preparation. Technical Papers of the Bureau of Standards (58)

  5. Talbot AN, Richart FE (1923) The strength of concrete and its relation to the cement, aggregate and water, vol 137. Bulletin, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, pp 1–118

  6. Nijboer LW (1948) Plasticity as a factor in the design of dense bituminous road carpets. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goode JF, Lufsey LA (1962) A new graphical chart for evaluating aggregate gradations. Proc Assoc Asph Paving Technol 31:176–207

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meininger RC (1992) Effects of aggregates and mineral fillers on asphalt mixture performance. ASTM STP 1147, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Vavrik WR, Pine WJ, Huber G, Carpenter SH, Bailey R (2001) The bailey method of gradation evaluation: the influence of aggregate gradation and packing characteristics on voids in the mineral aggregate. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 70:132–175

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asphalt Institute (2001) Superpave mix design. Lexington

  11. Birgisson B, Ruth BE (2001) Development of tentative guidelines for the selection of aggregate gradations for hot mix asphalt. In: White TD, Johnson SR, Yzenas JJ (eds) Aggregate contribution to hot mix asphalt (HMA) performance, ASTM STP 1412. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roque R, Birgisson B, Kim S, Guarin A (2006) Development of mix design guidelines for improved performance of asphalt mixtures. Florida Department of Transportation, final report, UF Project no. 4910-4554-032-12

  13. Guarin A, Roque R, Kim S, Sirin O (2012) Disruption factor of asphalt mixtures. Int J Pavement Eng. doi:10.1080/10298436.2012.727992

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yideti TF, Birgisson B, Jelagin D, Guarin A (2013) Packing theory-based framework to evaluate permanent deformation of unbound granular materials. Int J Pavement Eng 14(3):309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yideti TF, Birgisson B, Jelagin D, Guarin A (2013) Packing theory-based framework for evaluating the resilient modulus of unbound granular materials. Int J Pavement Eng. doi:10.1080/10298436.2013.857772

  16. Lira B, Jelagin D, Birgisson B (2012) Gradation-based framework for asphalt mixture. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9982-3

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lira B, Jelagin D, Birgisson B (2012) Binder distribution model for asphalt mixtures based on packing of the primary structure. Int J Pavement Eng (Under review)

  18. Birgisson B, Roque R, Tia M, Masad EA (2005) Development and evaluation of test methods to evaluate water damage and effectiveness of antistripping agents. Florida Department of Transportation, final report, UF Project no. 4910-4504-722-12

  19. Nukunya B, Roque R, Tia M, Birgisson B (2001) Evaluation of VMA and other volumetric properties as criteria for the design and acceptance of superpave mixtures. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 70:38–69

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ruth BE, Roque R, Nukunya B (2002) Aggregate gradation characterization factors and their relationship to fracture energy and failure strain on asphalt mixtures. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 71:310–344

    Google Scholar 

  21. FHWA (1998) Performance of coarse-graded mixes at WesTrack-premature rutting. Final report, USA

  22. Powell RB (2001) As-Built Properties of Experimental Sections on the 2000 NCAT Pavement Test Track. NCAT Report

  23. Kandhal P, Chakraborty S (1996) Effect of asphalt film thickness on short- and long-term aging of asphalt paving mixtures. Transp Res Rec 1535(1):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pellinen TK (2001) Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt performance. Ph.D. thesis, Arizona State University, USA

  25. Cooke A, Rowe R (1999) Extension of porosity and surface area models for uniform porous media. J Environ Eng 125(2):126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. White TD (1985) Marshall procedures for design and quality control of asphalt mixtures. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 54:265–284

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to kindly acknowledge the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket) for providing financial support for the project under which this research was performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prabir Kumar Das.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 3.

Table 3 Gradation and volumetric properties of study asphalt mixtures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, P.K., Birgisson, B., Jelagin, D. et al. Investigation of the asphalt mixture morphology influence on its ageing susceptibility. Mater Struct 48, 987–1000 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0209-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0209-z

Keywords

Navigation