Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical property–porosity relationships of layered calcium silicate hydrate phases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamic mechanical analysis measurements were made on the following calcium-silicate- hydrate systems: 1.4 nm tobermorite (T), jennite (J), synthetic C–S–H (C/S = 0.80, 1.20 and 1.50) and cement paste. The age of the cement paste varied from 3 days to 45 years. Plots of storage modulus versus porosity were constructed for all these materials. The non-uniqueness of the curves is discussed with reference to Taylor’s analysis of strength-porosity curves and the influence of particle type, density and crystallinity. Additional insights regarding the practical application of T–J and T–CH nanostructural models for the C–S–H nanostructure in hydrated cements is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odler I, Roßler M (1985) Investigation on the relationship between porosity, structure and strength of hydrated Portland cement pastes. II Effect of pore structure and of degree of hydration. Cem Concr Res 15:401–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Odler I, Roßler M (1985) Investigation on the relationship between porosity, structure and strength of hydrated Portland cement pastes. I. Effect of porosity. Cem Concr Res 15:320–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mindess S (1970) Relation between the compressive strength and porosity of autoclaved calcium silicate hydrates. J Am Ceram Soc 53(11):621–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaudoin JJ, Feldman RF, Tumidajski PJ (1994) Pore structure of hardened Portland cement pastes and its influence on properties. Adv Cem Based Mater 1:224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor HFW (1977) Discussion of the paper, ‘Microstructure and strength of hydrated Cements’ by R.F. Feldman and J. J. Beaudoin. Cem Concr Res 7:465–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman RF, Beaudoin JJ (1976) Microstructure and strength of hydrated cements. Cem Concr Res 6:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor HFW (1997) Hydration of the calcium silicate phases, cement chemistry, Chap. 5. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, p 459

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson IG (2004) Tobermorite/jennite- and tobermorite/calcium hydroxide-based models for the structure of C–S–H: applicability to hardened pastes of tricalcium silicate, β-dicalcium silicate, Portland cement, and blends of Portland cement with blast-furnace slag, metakaolin, or silica fume. Cem Concr Res 34:1733–1777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor HFW (1986) Proposed structure of calcium silicate hydrate gel. J Am Ceram Soc 69(6):464–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu P, Kirkpatrick RJ (1999) Thermal dehydration of tobermorite and jennite. Concr Sci Eng 1:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gard JA, Taylor HFW (1976) Calcium silicate hydrate (II) (“C–S–H(II)”). Cem Concr Res 6:667–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hara N, Inoue N (1980) Formation of jennite from fumed silica. Cem Concr Res 10:677–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor HFW (1997) Chapter 5 Hydration of the calcium silicate phases, cement chemistry. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, p 459

    Google Scholar 

  14. Soroka I, Sereda PJ (1968) The structure of cement- stone and use of compacts as structural models. Proceedings of 5th international symposium on the chemistry of the cement, vol 3. Tokyo, pp 67–73

  15. Feldman RF (1972) Factors affecting the Young’s modulus-porosity relation of hydrated Portland cement compacts. Cem Concr Res 2(4):375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sereda PJ, Feldman RF (1963) Compacts of powdered material as porous bodies for use in sorption studies. J Appl Chem 13:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beaudoin JJ (1983) Comparison of mechanical properties of compacted calcium hydroxide and Portland cement paste systems. Cem Concr Res 13:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sereda PJ, Feldman RF, Swenson EG (1966) Effect of sorbed water on some mechanical properties of hydrated Portland cement pastes and compacts. Highw Res Board Special Rep 90:58–73

    Google Scholar 

  19. Menard KP (1999) Dynamic mechanical analysis—a practical introduction. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, p 208

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Alizadeh R, Beaudoin JJ, Raki L (2011) Mechanical properties of calcium silicate hydrates. Mater Struct. 44:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Crennan JM, El-Hemaly SAS, Taylor HFW (1977) Autoclaved lime-quartz materials I. Some factors influencing strength. Cem Concr Res 7:493–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Neville AM (1963) Properties of concrete. Wiley, New York, p 532

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beaudoin JJ (1982) Effect of humidity and porosity on fracture of hardened Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 12:705–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Pourbeik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pourbeik, P., Beaudoin, J.J., Alizadeh, R. et al. Mechanical property–porosity relationships of layered calcium silicate hydrate phases. Mater Struct 46, 1489–1495 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9990-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9990-3

Keywords

Navigation