Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical model for modified bituminous binder master curves

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling the mechanical behavior of asphalt binders and mixtures has been the subject of intensified research in recent decades. Master curves of the norm of the complex modulus |G*| in the linear viscoelastic domain are frequently used for modeling, while phase angle master curves are less frequently considered for this purpose. Therefore in this research, an empirical model is introduced for phase angle master curves of modified and neat bituminous binders. The model is based on a general form of a double-logistic (DL) mathematical function. The |G*| master curve was then modeled using a mutual relationship between the phase angle and |G*|. Master curves of three neat and seven modified binders were generated and used to validate the DL model. The results showed that the model is capable of properly predicting the plateau region of phase angle master curves. In particular, the asymptotic behavior of the master curves at high frequencies can be modeled correctly. The model also describes irregularities in the high temperature range of the phase angle master curve. In general, model outputs such as the phase angle value at the plateau, glassy modulus, rheological index and crossover frequency correctly predict the behavior of the neat and modified binders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Airey GD (2002) Rheological evaluation of ethylene vinyl acetate polymer modified bitumens. Const Build Mater 16(8):473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Airey GD (2003) Rheological properties of styrene butadiene styrene polymer modified road bitumens. Fuel 82(14):1709–1719. doi:10.1016/s0016-2361(03)00146-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson DA, Christensen DW, Bahia H (1991) Physical properties of asphalt cement and the development of performance-related specifications. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 60:437–475

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson DA, Christensen DW, Bahia HU, Dongre R, Sharma M, Antle CE, Button J (1994) Binder characterization and evaluation, vol 3: physical characterization, SHRP-A-369. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington DC

  5. Baumgaertel M, Winter H (1989) Determination of discrete relaxation and retardation time spectra from dynamic mechanical data. Rheol Acta 28(6):511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1987) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, vol 1, fluid mechanics, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Booij H, Thoone G (1982) Generalization of Kramers–Kronig transforms and some approximations of relations between viscoelastic quantities. Rheol Acta 21(1):15–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chailleux E, Ramond G, Such C, de La Roche C (2006) A mathematical-based master-curve construction method applied to complex modulus of bituminous materials. Road Mater Pavement Des 7(1):75–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen D, Anderson DA (1992) Interpretation of dynamic mechanical test data for paving grade asphalt cements. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 61:67–116

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dickinson EJ, Witt HP (1974) The dynamic shear modulus of paving asphalts as a function of frequency. Trans Soc Rheol 18(4):591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobson G, Jongepier RD, Monismith C, Puzinauskas V, Busching H, Warden WD (1969) The dynamic mechanical properties of bitumen. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 38:123–139

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferry JD (1980) Viscoelastic properties of polymers, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo H (2011) A simple algorithm for fitting a gaussian function [DSP tips and tricks]. Signal Process Mag IEEE 28(5):134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen EA (2002) Determination of discrete relaxation spectra using simulated annealing. J Non Newtonian Fluid Mech 107(1–3):1–11

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jongepier R, Kuilman B, Schmidt R, Puzinauskas V, Rostler F (1969) Characteristics of the rheology of bitumens. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 38:98–122

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marasteanu O, Anderson DA (1999) Improved model for bitumen rheological characterization. In: Eurobitume workshop on performance related properties for bitumens binder, Luxembourg

  17. Marateanu M, Anderson D (1996) Time-temperature dependency of asphalt binders—an improved model. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 65:408–448

    Google Scholar 

  18. Menard KP (1998) Dynamic mechanical analysis. Wiley Online Library

  19. NCHRP (2004) Guide for mechanistic–empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. NCHRP Report 01-37A. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington DC

  20. Olard F, Di Benedetto H (2003) General 2S2P1D model and relation between the linear viscoelastic behaviours of bituminous binders and mixes. Road Mater Pavement Des 4(2):185–224

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rowe GM, Baumgardner G, Sharrock MJ (2008) A generalized logistic function to describe the master curve stiffness properties of binder mastics and mixtures. In: 45th Petersen Asphalt Research Conference. Laramie, Wyoming, July 14–16

  22. Rowe GM, Baumgardner G, Sharrock MJ (2009) Functional forms for master curve analysis of bituminous materials. In: Loizos A, Partl MN, Scarpas T, Al-Qadi IL (eds) Advanced testing and characterization of bituminous materials. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 81–91

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stastna J, Zanzotto L, Ho K (1994) Fractional complex modulus manifested in asphalts. Rheol Acta 33(4):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tabatabaee N, Teymourpour P (2010) Rut resistance evaluation of mixtures made with modified asphalt binders. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, ISAP, Japan, August 2010

  25. Van der Poel C (1954) A general system describing the visco elastic properties of bitumens and its relation to routine test data. J Appl Chem 4(5):221–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yusoff NIM, Chailleux E, Airey GD (2011a) A comparative study of the influence of shift factor equations on master curve construction. Int J Pavement Res Technol 4(6):324–336

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yusoff NIM, Shaw MT, Airey GD (2011) Modelling the linear viscoelastic rheological properties of bituminous binders. Const Build Mater 25:2171–2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeng M, Bahia H, Zhai H, Turner P (2001) Rheological modeling of modified asphalt binders and mixtures. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 70:403–441

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Mohammad Asgharzadeh.

Appendices

Appendix A

The glassy modulus of the binders is calculated using Eq. (6) when simplified as:

$${}\log \left| {G_{g}^{*} } \right| = \lim_{{\log f_{red} \to \infty }} \log \left| {G^{*} } \right| = \log \left| {G_{0}^{*} } \right| + \mathop{\lim}\limits_{{\log f_{red} \to \infty }} \frac{1}{90}\left(- \delta_{P} \cdot {\bf\varvec{H}}\left( {{\bf\varvec{f}}_{red} - {\bf\varvec{f}}_{P} } \right) \left( \log ( {f_{red} } ) - \frac{{\pi^{1/2} }}{{2 \cdot S_{R} }}erf\left( {S_{R} \log \left( {\frac{{f_{red} }}{{f_{P} }}} \right)} \right) - \log \left( {f_{P} } \right) \cdot \frac{{\delta_{P} + \delta_{L} }}{{\delta_{P} }}\right) + \delta_{P} \cdot \log f_{red}\right) = \frac{1}{90}\left( { - \delta_{P} \cdot \left( \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{\log f_{red} \to \infty }} \log \left( {f_{red} } \right) - \frac{{\pi^{1/2} }}{{2 \cdot S_{R} }}\mathop {\lim }\limits_{{\log f_{red} \to \infty }} erf\left( S_{R} \log \left( {\frac{{f_{red} }}{{f_{P} }}} \right)\right) - \log \left( {f_{P} } \right) \cdot \frac{{\delta_{P} + \delta_{L} }}{{\delta_{P} }}\right) + \mathop {\lim }\limits_{{\log f_{red} \to \infty }} \delta_{P} \cdot \log f_{red}}\right)+ \log \left| {G_{0}^{*} } \right| = \frac{1}{90}\left( {\delta_{P} \frac{{\pi^{1/2} }}{{2 \cdot S_{R} }} - \log \left( {f_{P} } \right) \cdot \delta_{P}\frac{{\delta_{P} + \delta_{L} }}{{\delta_{P} }}} \right) + \log \left| {G_{0}^{*} } \right| = \frac{1}{90}\left( {\delta_{P} \frac{{\pi^{1/2} }}{{2 \cdot S_{R} }} + \left( {\delta_{P} + \delta_{L} } \right) \cdot \log \left( {f_{P} } \right)} \right)+ \log\left| {G_{0}^{*} } \right| $$
(A.1)

Rheological index R, as defined by Anderson et al. [3], can be calculated using the glassy modulus. This parameter shows how rapidly the behavior of asphalt cement changes overtime and thus indicates the time-dependency of the asphalt binder [3]. R can be calculated as the difference between the glassy modulus and the modulus of the binder at a point where the loss and storage moduli are equal (or the phase angle is 45°). The crossover frequency f C can be calculated by setting Eq. (4a) to 45° and extracting the logarithm of the reduced frequency as a function of the model parameters:

$$ {\text{Log}}f_{\text{C}} = {\text{Log}}f_{\text{P}} + {\bf\varvec{H}}\left( {\bf\varvec{f}_{\text{C}} - {\bf\varvec{f}}_{\text{P}} } \right) \cdot \frac{{\sqrt { - {\text{LN}}\left( {\frac{45}{{\delta_{\text{P}}}}} \right)} }}{{S_{\text{R}} }} - {\bf\varvec{H}}\left( {\bf\varvec{f}_{\text{P}} - {\bf\varvec{f}}_{\text{C}} } \right) \cdot \frac{{\sqrt { - {\text{LN}}\left( {\frac{{\delta_{\text{P}} + \delta_{\text{L}} - 45}}{{\delta_{\text{L}} }}} \right)} }}{{S_{\text{L}} }} $$
(A.2)

The above equation denotes that Log(f C ) is located on either side of the frequency at the plateau (f P) and can be calculated using either of the Napierian logarithms.

The complex modulus at crossover frequency G *fc can then be calculated by substituting Log(f C ) from Eq. (A.2) into Eq. (6). Finally, R can be calculated as:

$$ R = {\text{Log}}\frac{{G_{\text{g}}^{*} }}{{G_{{f_{\text{c}} }}^{*} }} $$
(A.3)

Appendix B

The DL model is also capable of modeling asphalt mixture master curves using the same parameters presented above. The high frequency asymptotes of the master curves of asphalt mixtures can be obtained using the same method as for asphalt binders. Here, the phase angle approaches zero and |E*| approaches the glassy modulus. For low frequency ranges (f red ≤ f P), the phase angle approaches δ P + δ L. The phase angle master curve of an asphalt mixture usually shows an intermediate peak and declines on both sides at higher and lower frequencies. Based on Eq. (6), the |G*| low frequency asymptote will be zero except for δ L  = −δ P , where it approaches a fixed value of |G *0 |−10^ (π 0.5 δ P /180S L). It is generally believed that asphalt mixtures show the behavior of a viscoelastic solid. These materials approach an equilibrium modulus of |G *e | at very low frequencies [28], which happens only when δ L = −δ P. This is not a limitation, but an advantage, and the number of parameters will reduce to five. The phase angle for extremely low frequencies will also be zero for δ L = −δ P. This is a commonly used assumption for asphalt mixtures [28].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asgharzadeh, S.M., Tabatabaee, N., Naderi, K. et al. An empirical model for modified bituminous binder master curves. Mater Struct 46, 1459–1471 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9988-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9988-x

Keywords

Navigation