Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microgrid system allocation using a bi-level intelligent approach and demand-side management

  • Original Research
  • Published:
MRS Energy & Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Demand-side management (DSM) segregates the elastic and inelastic loads and restructures the load demand model of a distribution system by minimizing the operational cost of the entire process. This is done by optimally transferring the flexible loads to hours when the per-unit cost of utility is lower. This paper performs a bi-level optimization strategy to lower the operating expense of a low-voltage microgrid (LV MG) system operating in grid-connected mode, comprising battery energy storage (BES), renewable energy sources (RES), and fossil fuel-powered generators. In the first level of optimization, the load model is restructured as per the DSM participation level. Thereafter, the restructured load demand model is considered, and optimal allocation for distributed generators (DGs) is percolated for minimizing the generation cost of the microgrid system in the second level. A recently developed hybrid swarm intelligence algorithm that has already been used in solving diverse power system optimization problems was used as the optimization tool for the study. The generation cost was minimized for different grid participation types and grid pricing strategies with and without consideration of DSM. The numerical results show a 55–75% reduction in generation cost when 20–30% DSM participation was considered.

Graphical abstract

Highlights

  1. i.

    The generation cost of an LV microgrid (MG) system was evaluated for diverse grid-dependent scenarios.

  2. ii.

    The impact of demand-side management on the performance of the MG system and generation costs was studied.

Discussion

The work described in this paper initially restructured the forecasted load demand for different DSM participation levels to reduce the peak demand and improve the load factor of the MG system. Thereafter, the generation costs were evaluated for diverse grid-dependent scenarios and compared for various load demand models obtained after DSM implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors will make data available upon reasonable request.

References

  1. M. Ghasemi, E. Akbari, M. Zand, M. Hadipour, S. Ghavidel, Li. Li, An efficient modified HPSO-TVAC-based dynamic economic dispatch of generating units. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 47(19–20), 1826–1840 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Mahmoud, M. Abdel-Nasser, E. Mustafa, Z.M. Ali, Improved salp–swarm optimizer and accurate forecasting model for dynamic economic dispatch in sustainable power systems. Sustainability 12(2), 576 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. He, Y. Zhao, T. Huang, Optimizing the dynamic economic dispatch problem by the distributed consensus-based ADMM approach. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inf. 16(5), 3210–3221 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Xiong, D. Shi, Hybrid biogeography-based optimization with brain storm optimization for non-convex dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. Energy 157, 424–435 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Zou, S. Li, X. Kong, H. Ouyang, Z. Li, Solving the dynamic economic dispatch by a memory-based global differential evolution and a repair technique of constraint handling. Energy 147, 59–80 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Yang, Z. Peng, Z. Yang, Y. Guo, Xu. Chen, An enhanced exploratory whale optimization algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch. Energy Rep. 7, 7015–7029 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Mandal, P.K. Roy, Dynamic economic dispatch problem in hybrid wind based power systems using oppositional based chaotic grasshopper optimization algorithm. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 13(1), 013306 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Ma, Z. Yang, P. You, M. Fei, Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization for dynamic economic emission load dispatch considering plug-in electric vehicles charging. Energy 135, 101–111 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Dey, B. Bhattacharyya, Dynamic cost analysis of a grid connected microgrid using neighborhood based differential evolution technique. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 29, e2665 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Dai, Z. Yang, J. Yu, W. Cui, W. Li, J. Li et al., Economic dispatch of interconnected networks considering hidden flexibility. Energy 223, 120054 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Toopshekan, H. Yousefi, F.R. Astaraei, Technical, economic, and performance analysis of a hybrid energy system using a novel dispatch strategy. Energy 213, 118850 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Lokeshgupta, S. Sivasubramani, Multi-objective dynamic economic and emission dispatch with demand side management. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 97, 334–343 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Basu, A. Chowdhury, Cuckoo search algorithm for economic dispatch. Energy 60, 99–108 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Singh, A. Khamparia, A hybrid whale optimization-differential evolution and genetic algorithm based approach to solve unit commitment scheduling problem: WODEGA. Sustain.: Comput. Inform. Syst. 28, 100442 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Li, Multi-objective optimization of space adaptive division for environmental economic dispatch. Sustain. Comput.: Inform. Syst. 30, 100500 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Roy, An efficient MABC-ANN technique for optimal management and system modeling of micro grid. Sustain. Comput.: Inform. Syst. 30, 100552 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Wang, C.J. Miller, M. Hashem Nehrir, J.W. Sheppard, S.P. McElmurry, A load profile management integrated power dispatch using a Newton-like particle swarm optimization method. Sustain.: Comput. Inform. Syst. 8, 8-17.B (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dey, S.K. Roy, B. Bhattacharyya, Neighborhood based differential evolution technique to perform dynamic economic load dispatch on microgrid with renewables, in 2018 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Information Technology (RAIT) (2018), pp. 1–6

  19. K. Wu, Q. Li, Z. Chen, J. Lin, Y. Yi, M. Chen, Distributed optimization method with weighted gradients for economic dispatch problem of multi-microgrid systems. Energy 222, 119898 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. I.N. Trivedi, P. Jangir, M. Bhoye, N. Jangir, An economic load dispatch and multiple environmental dispatch problem solution with microgrids using interior search algorithm. Neural Comput. Appl. 30(7), 2173–2189 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I.N. Trivedi, D.K. Thesiya, A. Esmat, P. Jangir, A multiple environment dispatch problem solution using ant colony optimization for micro-grids, in 2015 International Conference on Power and Advanced Control Engineering (ICPACE) (IEEE, 2015), pp. 109–115

  22. M.H. Alham, M. Elshahed, D.K. Ibrahim, E.E.D. Abo El Zahab, A dynamic economic emission dispatch considering wind power uncertainty incorporating energy storage system and demand side management. Renew. Energy 96, 800–811 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Ganjefar, M. Tofighi, Dynamic economic dispatch solution using an improved genetic algorithm with non-stationary penalty functions. Eur. Trans. Electr. Power 21(3), 1480–1492 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Maulik, D. Das, Optimal operation of microgrid using four different optimization techniques. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 21, 100–120 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Liu, N.-K.C. Nair, A two-stage stochastic dynamic economic dispatch model considering wind uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 7, 819–829 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Chauhan, A. Jain, N. Verma, Solving economic dispatch problem using MiPower by lambda iteration method, in 2017 1st International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Information Management (ICISIM) (2017), pp. 95–99

  27. M. Kumar, J. Dhillon, Hybrid artificial algae algorithm for economic load dispatch. Appl. Soft Comput. 71, 89–109 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Basak, B. Dey, B. Bhattacharyya, Uncertainty-based dynamic economic dispatch for diverse load and wind profiles using a novel hybrid algorithm. Environ. Dev. Sustain. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02218-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Dey, S. Basak, A. Pal, Demand-side management based optimal scheduling of distributed generators for clean and economic operation of a microgrid system. Int. J. Energy Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Sharma, Y.R. Sood, N.K. Sharma, M. Bajaj, H.M. Zawbaa, R.A. Turky, S. Kamel, Modeling and sensitivity analysis of grid-connected hybrid green microgrid system. Ain Shams Eng. J. 13(4), 101679 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A.N. Abdalla, M.S. Nazir, Z. Tiezhu, M. Bajaj, P. Sanjeevikumar, L. Yao, Optimized economic operation of microgrid: Combined cooling and heating power and hybrid energy storage systems. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 143(7), 070906 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Dashtdar, M. Bajaj, S.M.S. Hosseinimoghadam, Design of optimal energy management system in a residential microgrid based on smart control. Smart Sci. 10(1), 25–39 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. M. Dashtdar, M.S. Nazir, S.M.S. Hosseinimoghadam, M. Bajaj, B.S. Goud, Improving the sharing of active and reactive power of the islanded microgrid based on load voltage control. Smart Sci. 10(2), 142–157 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Sharma, Y.R. Sood, V. Kumar, N.K. Sharma, M. Bajaj, F. Jurado, S. Kamel, Optimal sizing and cost assessment of off grid connected hybrid microgrid system, in 2022 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM) (IEEE, 2022), pp. 344–348

  35. O. Abedinia, M. Bagheri, Power distribution optimization based on demand respond with improved multi-objective algorithm in power system planning. Energies 14(10), 2961 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. S. Basak, B. Dey, B. Bhattacharyya, Demand side management for solving environment constrained economic dispatch of a microgrid system using hybrid MGWOSCACSA algorithm. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology (2022)

  37. N. Karmakar, B. Bhattacharyya, Optimal reactive power planning in power transmission system considering FACTS devices and implementing hybrid optimisation approach. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 14(25), 6294–6305 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. B. Dey, S. Basak, B. Bhattacharyya, A comparative analysis between price-penalty factor method and fractional programming method for combined economic emission dispatch problem using novel probabilistic CSA-JAYA algorithm (2021), pp. 136–141

  39. S. Basak, B. Bhattacharyya, B. Dey, Combined economic emission dispatch on dynamic systems using hybrid CSA-JAYA Algorithm. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 13, 2269–2290 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar, K. Prakash, B. Saravanan, Day ahead scheduling of generation and storage in a microgrid considering demand Side management. J. Energy Storage 21, 78–86 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. B. Dey, B. Bhattacharyya, R. Devarapalli, A novel hybrid algorithm for solving emerging electricity market pricing problem of microgrid. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 36(2), 919–961 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. B. Dey, S. Raj, S. Mahapatra, F.P.G. Márquez, Optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources in microgrid systems based on electricity market pricing strategies by a novel hybrid optimization technique. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 134, 107419 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. M.H. Hassan, S. Kamel, S.Q. Salih, T. Khurshaid, M. Ebeed, Developing chaotic artificial ecosystem-based optimization algorithm for combined economic emission dispatch. IEEE Access 9, 51146–51165 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. A. Askarzadeh, A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 169, 1–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. R. Rao, Jaya: A simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 7(1), 19–34 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology [File No: TMD/CERI/BEE/2016/078 ] and GIET University, Gunupur, Odisha.

Funding

No funding has been received by any of the authors for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sourav Basak.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no known financial or personal relationships that may seem to have impacted the work presented in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The optimization tool used for minimization of generation cost for the microgrid system is a hybrid algorithm combining the crow search algorithm and JAYA algorithm. The mathematical modelling details of the algorithm are discussed below (Fig. 11).

Figure 11
figure 11

Flow chart of CSAJAYA for DED in grid-connected microgrid.

$$X^{u,iter + 1} = \left\{ \begin{gathered} X^{u,iter} + rand_{u} \times fl^{u} \times (m^{v,iter} - X^{u,iter} ),{\text{if}}\;\;rand_{v} \ge AP^{v} \hfill \\ {\text{a}}\;{\text{random}}\;{\text{position}},\,\,\,\,\,\,{\text{otherwise}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(17)
$$m^{u,iter + 1} = \left\{ \begin{gathered} X^{u,iter + 1} ,\;{\text{if}}\;f(X^{u,iter + 1} )\; < \;f(m^{u,iter} ) \hfill \\ m^{u,iter} ,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,{\text{otherwise}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(18)
$$X_{k,q,iter + 1}^{{}} = X_{k,q,iter} + c^{\prime}*(X_{k,best,iter} - \left| {X_{k,q,iter} } \right|) - c^{\prime\prime}*(X_{k,worst,iter} - \left| {X_{k,q,iter} } \right|)$$
(19)
$$X^{u,iter + 1} = \left\{ \begin{gathered} X^{u,iter} + rand_{1} \times fl^{u} \times (m^{v,iter} - X^{u,iter} )\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,,{\text{when}}\,\,rand_{j} \ge AP\,\,\,\,\,\& \,\,\,\,k = 1:n \hfill \\ X^{u,iter,k} + rand_{1} \times m_{best}^{k} \times \left| {X^{u,iter,k} } \right| - rand_{2} \times m_{worst}^{k} \times \left| {X^{u,iter,k} } \right|\,\,\,,{\text{when}}\,\,rand_{j} \le AP\,\,\,\,\,\& \,\,\,\,k = 1:n \hfill \\ {\text{end}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(20)
 

CSA44

JAYA45

CSAJAYA37,38,39

Governing equation

(17)

(19)

(20)

Memory update

(18)

NA

(18)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dey, B., Basak, S. & Bhattacharyya, B. Microgrid system allocation using a bi-level intelligent approach and demand-side management. MRS Energy & Sustainability 10, 113–125 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-022-00057-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-022-00057-5

Keywords

Navigation