TEOS forms amorphous silica nanoparticles after water hydrolysis and ethyl alcohol condensation. Thermal pre-treatment on a hotplate not only removes solvents and solidifies the coatings, but also initiates silica condensation and sugar pre-carbonization through crosslinking to form a stable silica network. Each silica layer after thermal pre-treatment is around 1 mg, whereas the weight of a sugar layer is minimal (a few micrograms or less). During the final high temperature treatment, three major processes occurred within the coatings: (1) Decomposition of TEOS forms amorphous silica layers by breaking the ethyl function groups (the thickness of each silica layer is around 600 – 700 nm (Fig. 1A)); (2) Pyrolysis of sugar at temperature > 200 °C forms polycyclic aromatic carbon black sheets [8] (the carbon black layer is only 10 – 20 nm thick (Fig. 1B)); (3) Heat-based polymerization locks in the nanocomposite architecture via chemical crosslinking within individual layers and also between silica and carbon layers. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) shows that both decomposition of TEOS and pyrolysis of sugar are complete at temperatures less than 550 °C (Fig. 2A and B), and the nanocomposite is then thermally stable to over 1150 °C (Fig. 2C).
Infrared spectra show chemical crosslinking of Si–O with carbon ring and Si- with carbon ring (Fig. 3). Compared to pure silica coatings, the 5-layered nanocomposite has two peaks in the range of 1250—1700 cm−1 which are the characteristic peaks of carbon black. The distinct peak around 940 cm−1 and enhanced shoulder around 1210 cm−1 for the 5-layered coating is consistent with oxygen bridging silicon and a carbon ring [14]. Similarly, the distinct peak around 1120 cm−1 is consistent with vibration of Si- attached to phenyl groups [14]. Chemical crosslinking between silica and carbon leads to the enhanced mechanical properties. The thermal pre-treatment was expected to play an important role in solidification of the composite coatings while initiating crosslinking. To test the effect of thermal pre-treatment, nanocomposites with and without thermal pre-treatment were prepared and tested (Table 1).
Table 1 Nanoindentation results for silicon wafer, pure silica layer, and three 13-layered nanocomposites Obtaining mechanical properties of thin, layered coatings is known to be challenging through the nanoindentation method. To benchmark nanoindentation results, blank silicon substrates and pure silica layers without sugar were also measured by nanoindentation using various maximum peak forces, from 0.5 to 10 mN, leading to displacements from 60 to 280 nm (Table 1). For a silicon substrate, the hardness and reduced modulus are consistent with different loads except at a high load of 10 mN. The hardness is around 9.5 to 10.5 GPa and the reduced modulus is around 120 GPa (Table 1). For a 600–700 nm thick silica layer without sugar, both hardness and modulus increase with higher loads due to interference of the underlying substrate (Table 1). The influence of a substrate is typically negligible if the displacement is less than 10% of the thickness of the coatings e.g., [15, 16]. Therefore, the values at 0.5 mN and 1 mN are mostly representative of the properties of the silica layer with minimal interference of the underlying substrate. The hardness of the silica layer is between 5 and 6 GPa, and reduced modulus is 60–70 GPa (Table 1), consistent with the modulus value for fused quartz in the literature (i.e., 63.1–69 GPa) [17, 18].
For two 13-layered nanocomposites without thermal pre-treatment, indentation measurements with maximum load of 3, 5 and 12 mN were conducted. Both samples yield similar and consistent results with displacements from 140 to 280 nm (Table 1). Regardless of the displacement depths, the hardness of these layered nanocomposites is greater than 9 GPa and the modulus is greater than 80 GPa. The consistent results with different displacement depths show minimal substrate interference on the hardness and modulus. Compared to pure silica without sugar layers, the hardness of layered nanocomposites is enhanced by 50% from 6 to 9 GPa whereas the modulus also increases from less than 70 GPa to over 80 GPa.
For the 13-layered nanocomposite with thermal pre-treatment, the nanoindentation measurements with 3 and 12 mN loading produced consistent results with hardness greater than 11 GPa and reduced modulus more than 120 GPa, greater than those without thermal pre-treatment and even the silicon substrate (Table 1). The hardness and modulus are enhanced by more than 80% compared to silica coatings without sugar. The results demonstrate that thermal pre-treatment is necessary to form the most robust coatings. Without this step, the hardness and modulus of the nanocomposite is less enhanced.
The reduced modulus for the 13-layered thermally pre-treated nanocomposite is more than 120 GPa, which significantly outperforms literature studies using a similar layer-by-layer assembly technique to synthesize composite material. The greatest moduli reported in literature range from 9 GPa up to 60 GPa [19, 20] for montmorillonite clay and polymeric matrix interlayer composite. These moduli are less than that of natural seashell (~ 70 GPa) [21].
Current debris shields used on pulsed power facilities involve multiple layers of materials such as lithium, beryllium, aluminium, Kapton®, and Spectra® (ultra-high molecular weight polystyrene). Beryllium is the best shield material in terms of thermal stability and mechanical properties. However, the use of lithium or beryllium introduces major environmental safety and health (ES&H) concerns for post-recovery and cleaning due to their respective reactivity and toxicity. Kapton and Spectra have strong mechanical properties, but poor thermal stability with peak service temperatures of ~ 250 °C and ~ 120 °C, respectively. The nanocomposites synthesized using common material silica and sugar have comparable hardness and modulus to the best of the currently used materials without ES&H concerns.