Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Digital Light Processing (DLP): 3D printing of polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposites—Efficient antimicrobial material for biomedical devices

  • Research Letter
  • Published:
MRS Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacterial infections are one of the major causes of surgical implant inefficiency and failure. Herein, we present a Nanocomposite (NC) produced by the addition of Poly(N-vinyl carbazole)-Graphene Oxide dispersion (PVK-GO) as a nanofiller to a commercial photopolymer acrylate resin and 3D printed as coatings via the Digital Light Processing technique. Characterization and bioassay results against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus confirmed the elevated thermomechanical properties and efficient antibacterial activity of the printed NC-based coatings. The present study demonstrates the fabrication and optimization of a PVK-GO-based NC and its potential utilization as a 3D-printable material for biomedical applications.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article's supplementary material.

References

  1. A. Shahid et al., The prospects of antimicrobial coated medical implants. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 19, 22808000211040304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/22808000211040304/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_22808000211040304-FIG2.JPEG

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. von Eiff, B. Jansen, W. Kohnen, K. Becker, Infections associated with medical devices pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis. Drugs 65(2), 179–214 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P.S. Stewart, J.W. Costerton, Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 358(9276), 135–138 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Mouhyi, D.M. Dohan Ehrenfest, T. Albrektsson, The peri-implantitis: implant surfaces, microstructure, and physicochemical aspect. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 14, 170 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00244.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.N. Dave, H.M. Joshi, V.P. Venugopalan, Novel biocatalytic polymer-based antimicrobial coatings as potential ureteral biomaterial: preparation and in vitro performance evaluation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55(2), 845–853 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00477-10/FORMAT/EPUB

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Ishihama et al., An antibacterial coated polymer prevents biofilm formation and implant-associated infection. Sci. Rep. 11, 3602 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82992-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. I. Noda et al., Development of novel thermal sprayed antibacterial coating and evaluation of release properties of silver ions. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 89(2), 456–465 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/JBM.B.31235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Singha, J. Locklin, H. Handa, A review of the recent advances in antimicrobial coatings for urinary catheters. Acta Biomater. 50, 20–40 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTBIO.2016.11.070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Shaban, F. Mohamed, S. Abdallah, Production and characterization of superhydrophobic and antibacterial coated fabrics utilizing ZnO Nanocatalyst OPEN. Sci. Rep. 8, 3925 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22324-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. J.Z. Manapat, Q. Chen, P. Ye, R.C. Advincula, 3D printing of polymer nanocomposites via stereolithography. Macromol. Mater. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201600553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Zhang, Q. Hu, S. Wang, J. Tao, M. Gou, Digital light processing based three-dimensional printing for medical applications. Int. J. Bioprint. (2020). https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i1.242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.H. Rey Sta Agueda, R.D. Maalihan, Í.G.M. da Silva, N.P. Dugos, E.B. Caldona, R.C. Advincula, Polymers for additive manufacturing prospective 3D printing of biomedically relevant polymer materials and biocompatibility. MRS Commun. 11, 197–212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-021-00038-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J.O. Palaganas, N.B. Palaganas, L. Jose, I. Ramos, C. Primo, C. David, 3D printing of covalent functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite via stereolithography. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 46034 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b12071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Lantean et al., 3D printing of magnetoresponsive polymeric materials with tunable mechanical and magnetic properties by digital light processing. Adv. Mater. Technol. 4, 1900505 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S.U. Bae, B.J. Kim, Effects of cellulose nanocrystal and inorganic nanofillers on the morphological and mechanical properties of digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printed photopolymer composites. Appl. Sci. 11(15), 6835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP11156835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.S. Novoselov et al., Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science (1979) 306(5696), 666–669 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1102896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. I.E. MejIas-Carpio, C.M. Santos, X. Wei, D.F. Rodrigues, Toxicity of a polymer-graphene oxide composite against bacterial planktonic cells, biofilms, and mammalian cells. Nanoscale 4, 4746 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr30774j

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J.I. Paredes, S. Villar-Rodil, A. Martínez-Alonso, J.M.D. Tascón, Graphene oxide dispersions in organic solvents. Langmuir 24, 10560 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/la801744a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Z.Y. Jiang et al., 3D stereolithography printing of graphene oxide reinforced complex architectures. Nanotechnology 26, 434003 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/43/434003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J.L. Suter, R.C. Sinclair, P.V. Coveney, Principles governing control of aggregation and dispersion of graphene and graphene oxide in polymer melts. Adv. Mater. 32(36), 2003213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.202003213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Yu, L. Sisi, Y. Haiyan, L. Jie, Progress in the functional modification of graphene/graphene oxide: a review. RSC Adv. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra01068e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C.M. Santos, J. Mangadlao, F. Ahmed, A. Leon, R.C. Advincula, D.F. Rodrigues, Graphene nanocomposite for biomedical applications: fabrication, antimicrobial and cytotoxic investigations. Nanotechnology 23(39), 395101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/39/395101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. C.M. Santos et al., Antimicrobial graphene polymer (PVK-GO) nanocomposite films. Chem. Commun. 47, 8892–8894 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc11877c

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. C.M. Santos, M.C.R. Tria, R.A.M.V. Vergara, K.M. Cui, R. Pernites, R.C. Advincula, Films of highly disperse electrodeposited poly(N-vinylcarbazole)-graphene oxide nanocomposites. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 212(21), 2371–2377 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/MACP.201100334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L.G. Canc et al., Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 11, 3190–3196 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201432g

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J.Z. Manapat, J. Dacula-Mangadlao, B. David-Buada-Tiu, G.C. Tritchler, R.C. Advincula, High-strength stereolithographic 3D printed nanocomposites: graphene oxide metastability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 10085 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b16174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. E.-H. Ramírez-Soria et al., On the effect of ultralow loading of microwave-assisted bifunctionalized graphene oxide in stereolithographic 3D-printed nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 49061–49072 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Zheng et al., Implication of surface properties, bacterial motility, and hydrodynamic conditions on bacterial surface sensing and their Initial adhesion. Front Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 82 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2021.643722/BIBTEX

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J.D. Mangadlao, C.M. Santos, M.J.L. Felipe, A.C.C. De Leon, D.F. Rodrigues, R.C. Advincula, On the antibacterial mechanism of graphene oxide (GO) Langmuir-Blodgett films. Chem. Commun. 51, 2886 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cc07836e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from the Governor’s Chair Funds, the University of Tennessee System, and the Center for Materials Processing (CMP)-TCE. Technical support from Malvern Panalytical, Frontier Laboratories, and Quantum Analytics is also acknowledged. Work (or part of this work) was conducted by ORNL’s Center for Nanophase Materials and Sciences by Advincula, Ivanov, and Chen, a US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rigoberto C. Advincula.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rigoberto C. Advincula was an editor of this journal during the review and decision stage. For the MRS Communications policy on review and publication of manuscripts authored by editors, please refer to http://www.mrs.org/editormanuscripts/.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3215 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edaugal, J.P., Ribeiro, E.L., Mitchell, M.K. et al. Digital Light Processing (DLP): 3D printing of polymer-based graphene oxide nanocomposites—Efficient antimicrobial material for biomedical devices. MRS Communications 13, 594–602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-023-00390-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-023-00390-x

Keywords

Navigation