Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Red mud: An environmental challenge but overlooked treasure for critical rare earth metals

  • Review Article
  • Published:
MRS Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rare earth metals (REMs) are a critical component not only for consumer electronics, but also for a wide range of strategic applications such as clean energy, electric vehicles, aerospace, automotive, and defense. The REMs are also progressively being integrated into various newer and advanced technologies that drive the demand and accelerate stress over primary resources. Despite ever-increasing demand and strategic importance, the REM supply chain is purely dependent on primary resources, whereas secondary resources such as “red mud” (RM), which has significant REM content, had rarely been exploited. RM is an industrial waste generated during alumina production by the Bayer process. Limitation and challenges of REM exploitation from RM mainly contributed by absences of efficient technology, lack of diversified research and precise data, and clear assessment of REM quantity and value remain unlocked in RM. Hence, the current investigation address issues such as the precise assessment of data, comprehensive estimation REM remains unexploited in RM through quantitative evaluation REMs in the globally stockpiled/generated RM and estimated future RM generation. The current investigation of RM as a secondary resource for REM oxide estimated, globally 253,228, 275,737, 290,545, 313,943, 328,752, 352,445, 358,369, 382,063, 387,986, and 385,024 tons of REM oxide in RM were either stockpiled or scrapped during the years 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. Global REM oxide mine production during the same period were 130,000, 130,000, 110,000, 110,000, 123,000, 124,000, 129,000, 130,000, 190,000, and 210,000 tons, respectively. The global alumina industry and RM data indicated, respectively, during 1970–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, 2010–2019 decades 847, 994, 1289, 2147, 3323 thousand tons of REM oxide in RM were scrapped/stockpiled. From the estimated alumina demand for the next three decades, REM oxide in RM to be scrapped/stockpiled could reach 1987, 2109, 2239, 2376, 2522, and 2677 thousand tons cumulatively in each five-year interval for the years 2021–2025, 2026–2030, 2031–2035, 2036–2040, 2041–2045, and 2046–2050, respectively. The ratio of projected REM oxide to be scrapped in RM versus demand for the next five years, i.e., 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 years, respectively could be 2.62, 1.55, 1.48, 1.42, and 1.35, indicated in an efficient REM recovery from RM scenario, the supply chain bottleneck can be converted to supply chain abundant.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data cited in the manuscript are from open source and appropriately credited.

Abbreviations

RM:

Red mud (An industrial waste generated during alumina production).

REM(s):

Rare earth metal(s)

RE2O3 :

Rare earth metal oxides

REM:

Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu

References

  1. M. Taneez, C. Hurel, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 22106 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Mishra, S. Gostu, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 11, 483 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Xue, F. Zhu, X. Kong, C. Wu, L. Huang, N. Huang, W. Hartley, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 1120 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D.-Y. Liu, C.-S. Wu, Materials 5, 1232 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Sutar, S.C. Mishra, S. Sahoo, A.P. Chakraverty, H.S. Maharana, Am. Chem. Sci. J. 4, 255 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Swain, A. Akcil, J.-C. Lee, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 520 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.-C.G. Bünzli, V.K. Pecharsky, Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths: Including Actinides, vol. 50 (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Massari, M. Ruberti, Res. Pol. 38, 36 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. Commission, Study on the Review of the List of Critical Raw Materials Critical Raw Materials Factsheets (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Department of Energy, Critical Metals Strategy (US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Jaffe, J. Price, G. Ceder, R. Eggert, T. Graedel, K. Gschneidner, M. Hitzman, F. Houle, A. Hurd, R. Kelley, A. King, D. Milliron, B. Skinner, F. Slakey, J. Russo, Energy Critical Elements: Securing Materials for Emerging Technologies (APS Physics, Washington, DC, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Golev, M. Scott, P.D. Erskine, S.H. Ali, G.R. Ballantyne, Resour. Policy 41, 52 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Wübbeke, Resour. Policy 38, 384 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Garside, Rare Earth Reserves Worldwide as of 2019, by Country (in 1000 Metric Tons REO) (Statista Inc., New York, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. MineralFunds.com (Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021). https://mineralprices.com. Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  16. Institute for Rare Earths and Metals AG, Rare Earth Prices in December 2020, in Rare Earth Elements—Prices (Institute for Rare Earths and Metals AG, Zug, 2021)

  17. https://www.made-in-china.com (2021). Accessed 13 Jan 2021

  18. US Geological Survey (USGS), Bauxite and Alumina Statistics and Information (USGS, Reston, VA; US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 1970–2020)

  19. US Geological Survey (USGS), Mineral Commodity Summaries (USGS, Reston, VA; US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 1970)

  20. European Aluminium Association, Life cycle Inventory data for aluminium production and transformation processes in Europe, in Environmental Profile Report for the European Aluminium Industry (European Aluminium Association, 2013). https://european-aluminium.eu/. Accessed 14 Oct 2021

    Google Scholar 

  21. W.D. Menzie, J.J. Barry, D.I. Bleiwas, E.L. Bray, T.G. Goonan, G. Matos, The Global Flow of Aluminum From 2006 Through 2025 (US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1256, Reston, VA, 2010)

  22. E. Ujaczki, V. Feigl, M. Molnar, P. Cusack, T. Curtin, R. Courtney, L. O’Donoghue, P. Davris, C. Hugi, M.W. Evangelou, E. Balomenos, M. Lenz, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 93, 2498 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S.S. Abhilash, P. Meshram, B.D. Pandey, P.K. Behera, B.K. Satpathy, Red mud: A secondary resource for rare earth elements, in International Bauxite, Alumina and Aluminium Symposium (IBAA 2014), vol. 3 (Visakhapatnam, India, November 27–29, 2014), p. 148

  24. R. Damayanti, H. Khareunissa, Indones. Min. J. 19(3), 179 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Vind, A. Malfliet, B. Blanpain, P.E. Tsakiridis, A.H. Tkaczyk, V. Vassiliadou, D. Panias, Minerals 8(2), 77 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. É.A. Deady, E. Mouchos, K. Goodenough, B.J. Williamson, F. Wall, Mineral. Mag. 80, 43 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. P. Davris, E. Balomenos, D. Panias, I. Paspaliaris, Hydrometallurgy 164, 125 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. T.M. Tóth, F. Schubert, B. Raucsik, K. Fintor, Appl. Sci. 9(18), 3654 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Milovanoff, I.D. Posen, H.L. MacLean, J. Ind. Ecol. 25(1), 67 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Statista Inc., Rare Earth Oxide Demand Worldwide from 2017 to 2025 (Statista Inc., New York, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. International Energy Agency (IEA), Aluminium (IEA, Paris, 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Statista Inc., Consumption Growth Rate of Selected Materials Worldwide from 2018 to 2050 (Statista Inc., New York, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. US Geological Survey (USGS), Mineral Commodity Summaries 2020 (USGS, Reston, VA, 2020), p. 204

  34. Statista Inc., Countries with the Largest Bauxite Reserves Worldwide as of 2020 (Statista Inc., New York, 2021), p. 22

    Google Scholar 

  35. F. Lu, T. Xiao, J. Lin, A. Li, Q. Long, F. Huang, L. Xiao, X. Li, J. Wang, Q. Xiao, H. Chen, Hydrometallurgy 175, 124 (2018)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. W. Wang, Y. Pranolo, C.Y. Cheng, Sep. Purif. Technol. 108, 96 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. MTh. Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou, K.S. Hatzilyberis, L.N. Mendrinos, C.E. Salmas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41(23), 5794 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Ochsenkühn-Petropulu, Th. Lyberopulu, G. Parissakis, Anal. Chim. Acta 315, 231 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. G.D. Fulford, G. Lever, T. Sato, Recovery of rare earth elements from Bayer process red mud, US Patent US5030424A (1989)

Download references

Funding

Research reported above is not funded research, rather for academic interest research only.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.S. has handled everything associated with the above contribution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basudev Swain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Herewith the author of the manuscript reports no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swain, B. Red mud: An environmental challenge but overlooked treasure for critical rare earth metals. MRS Bulletin 47, 289–302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00300-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/s43577-022-00300-x

Keywords

Navigation