Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamic mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behaviors and the energy absorption capacity of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities were experimentally studied. The effects of density, strain rate, and graded density on the mechanical performances of aluminum foams were quantitatively evaluated. It was shown that the density had a significant effect on the quasi-static and dynamic compressive stress of aluminum foams. Moreover, impact compression experiment results revealed that aluminum foam was sensitive to the strain rate. As the strain rate increased, the plateau stress and energy absorption capacity increased distinctly and the rate of deformation increased correspondingly. Finally, the investigation of aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities to study their deformation and failure mechanisms, mechanical characteristics, and energy absorption capacities showed that the GD 0.48-IV specimen exhibited superior impact resistance. The present work can provide a valuable reference for the optimum design of aluminum foam against impact loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Table 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby: Cellular Solids Structures and Properties, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. M.F. Ashby, A.G. Evans, N.A. Fleck, L.J. Gibson, J.W. Hutchinson, and H.N.G. Wadley: Metal Foams: A Design Guide (Butterworth-Heinemann, USA, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.P. Mondal, M.D. Goel, and S. Das: Compressive deformation and energy absorption characteristics of closed cell aluminum-fly ash particle composite foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 507, 102–109 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Reglero, E. Solórzano, M.A. Rodríguez-Pérez, J.A. de Saja, and E. Porras: Design and testing of an energy absorber prototype based on aluminum foams. Mater. Des. 31, 3568–3573 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Aldoshan and S. Khanna: Effect of relative density on the dynamic compressive behavior of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 689, 17–24 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Banhart and H.W. Seeliger: Aluminium foam sandwich panels: Manufacture, metallurgy and applications. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10, 793–802 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Mohan, T.H. Yip, S. Idapalapati, and Z. Chen: Impact response of aluminum foam core sandwich structures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 529, 94–101 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. I. Elnasri and H. Zhao: Impact perforation of sandwich panels with aluminum foam core: A numerical and analytical study. Int J. Impact Eng. 96, 50–60 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Mukai, H. Kanahashi, T. Miyoshi, M. Mabuchi, T.G. Nieh, and K. Higashi: Experimental study of energy absorption in a close-celled aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Scr. Mater. 40, 921–927 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Zhao, I. Elnasri, and S. Abdennadher: An experimental study on the behaviour under impact loading of metallic cellular materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47, 757–774 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Irausquín, J.L. Pérez-Castellanos, V. Miranda, and F. Teixeira-Dias: Evaluation of the effect of the strain rate on the compressive response of a closed-cell aluminium foam using the split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Mater. Des. 47, 698–705 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. P.F. Wang, S.L. Xu, Z.B. Li, J.L. Yang, H. Zheng, and S.S. Hu: Temperature effects on the mechanical behavior of aluminum foam under dynamic loading. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 599, 174–179 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K.A. Dannemann and J. Lankford, Jr.: High strain rate compression of closed-cell aluminium foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 293, 157–164 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.E. Raj, V. Parameswaran, and B.S.S. Daniel: Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 526, 11–15 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. V.S. Deshpande and N.A. Fleck: High strain rate compressive behaviour of aluminium alloy foams. Int. J. Impact Eng. 24, 277–298 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Ruan, G. Lu, F.L. Chen, and E. Siores: Compressive behaviour of aluminium foams at low and medium strain rates. Compos. Struct. 57, 331–336 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Peroni, G. Solomos, and V. Pizzinato: Impact behaviour testing of aluminium foam. Int. J. Impact Eng. 53, 74–83 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Li, G. Ma, H. Zhou, and X. Du: Energy absorption analysis of density graded aluminium foam. Int. J. Protect. Struct. 2, 333–350 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.D. Li, H.Y. Zhou, and G.W. Ma: Numerical simulation of blast mitigation cladding with gradient metallic foam core. Appl. Mech. Mater. 82, 461–466 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Q. Chang, Y. Li-jun, and Y. Shu: Simulation and optimization of blast-resistant performance of graded aluminum foam sandwich structures. J. Vib. Shock. 32, 70–75 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Y. Xia, C.Q. Wu, Z.X. Liu, and Y.M. Yuan: Protective effect of graded density aluminium foam on RC slab under blast loading–An experimental study. Constr. Build. Mater. 111, 209–222 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Z.H. Wang, J.H. Shen, G.X. Lu, and L.M. Zhao: Compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum alloy foams at medium strain rates. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 2326–2330 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Ravichandran and G. Subhash: Critical appraisal of limiting strain rates for compression testing of ceramics in a Split-Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 263–267 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H.W. Song, Z.J. Fan, and G. Yu: Partition energy absorption of axially crushed aluminum foam-filled hat sections. Int. J. Solids Struct. 42, 2575–2600 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Chen, B. Zhang, and M.J. Forrestal: A split Hopkinson bar technique for low impedance materials. Exp. Mech. 39, 81–85 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. M.I. Idris, T. Vodenitcharova, and M. Hoffiman: Mechanical behaviour and energy absorption of closed-cell aluminium foam panels in uniaxial compression. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 517, 37–45 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M.A. Kariem, D. Ruan, J.H. Beynon, and D.A. Prabowo: Mini round-Robin test on the Split-Hopkinson pressure bar. J. Test. Eval. 46, 457–468 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. B.A. Gama, S.L. Lopatnikov, and J.W. Gillespie, Jr.: Hopkinson bar experimental technique: A critical review. Appl. Mech. Rev. 57, 223–250 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S.S. Hu, L.L. Wang, L. Song, and L. Zhang: Review of the development of Hopkinson pressure bar technique in China. Explos. Shock Waves 34, 641–657 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFC0809605 and 2018YFC0809600), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572018BJ04), and the Scientific and Technological Innovation Talent Program of Harbin (2017RAQXJ014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dabo Xin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Ma, C., Xin, D. et al. Dynamic mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities. Journal of Materials Research 35, 2575–2586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.157

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.157

Navigation