Abstract
Current practice for commercial spent nuclear fuel management in the United States of America (US) includes storage of spent fuel in both pools and dry storage cask systems at nuclear power plants. Most storage pools are filled to their operational capacity, and management of the approximately 2,200 metric tons of spent fuel newly discharged each year requires transferring older and cooler fuel from pools into dry storage. In the absence of a repository that can accept spent fuel for permanent disposal, projections indicate that the US will have approximately 134,000 metric tons of spent fuel in dry storage by mid-century when the last plants in the current reactor fleet are decommissioned. Current designs for storage systems rely on large dual-purpose (storage and transportation) canisters that are not optimized for disposal. Various options exist in the US for improving integration of management practices across the entire back end of the nuclear fuel cycle.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
National Research Council / National Academy of Sciences, The Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land, Report of the Committee on Waste Disposal of the Division of Earth Sciences (National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council Publication 519, Washington DC, 1957).
National Research Council / National Academies, Disposition of High-Level Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel: The Continuing Societal and Technical Challenges (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2001) 198 p.
United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, Experience Gained from Programs to Manage High-Level Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel in the United States and Other Countries, A Report to Congress and the Secretary of Energy, (Arlington VA, USA, 2011) 70 p.
Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, Report to the Secretary of Energy (2012) 157 p.
United States Department of Energy, Final Environmental Impact Statement for Decommissioning and/or Long-Term Stewardship at the West Valley Demonstration Project and Western New York Nuclear Service Center, Executive Summary (DOE/EIS-0226, 2010) 63 p.
J.S. Walker, The Road to Yucca Mountain, (University of California Press, 2009), p. 106– 110.
R. Reagan, Statement Announcing a Series of Policy Initiatives on Nuclear Energy (October 8, 1981) Available online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=44353 (accessed 5 December 2017).
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 10101 and following.
United States Department of Energy, Yucca Mountain Repository License Application. (DOE/RW-0573, Update no. 1, 2008) 8344 p.
United States Department of Energy, Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste (2013), 32 p.
United States Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, January 2009 Project Decision Schedule (DOE/RW-0604, 2009) 17p.
Curie Map (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2017), Available at: https://curie.ornl.gov/map (accessed December 5, 2017).
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Spent Fuel Pools, available at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/pools.html (accessed December 5, 2017).
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Dry Cask Storage, available at https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-storage/dry-cask-storage.html (accessed December 5, 2017).
R. H. Jones, Dry Storage Cask Inventory Assessment (U.S. Department of Energy FCRD-NFST-2014-000602, Revision 2, 2016) 170 p.
J.C. Wagner, J.L. Peterson, D.E. Mueller, J.C. Gehin, A. Worrall, T. Taiwo, M. Nutt, M.A. Williamson, M. Todosow, R. Wigeland, W.G. Halsey, R.P. Omberg, P.N. Swift, and J.T. Carter, Categorization of Used Nuclear Fuel Inventory in Support of a Comprehensive National Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy (Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL/TM-2012/308. FCRD-FCT-2012-000232, 2012) 98 p.
J. Carter, D. Vinson, and J. Wilson, Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste Inventory Report (U.S. DOE Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Management FCRD-NFST-2013-000263 Rev. 4 SRNL-STI-2016-00360, 2016) 176 p.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (NUREG-2157 Volume 1, 2014), 687 p.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A Pilot Probabilistic Risk Assessment Of a Dry Cask Storage System At a Nuclear Power Plant (NUREG-1864, 2007), 299 p.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Managing Aging Processes in Storage (MAPS) Report: Draft Report for Comment (NUREG-2214, 2017), 517 p.
B. Hanson, H. Alsaed, C. Stockman, D. Enos, R. Meyer, K. Sorenson, Gap Analysis to Support Extended Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel Rev. 0 (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition FCRD-USED-2011-000136 Rev. 0 PNNL-20509, 2012) 218 p.
Electric Power Research Institute, High Burnup Dry Storage Cask Research and Development Project Final Test Plan (prepared by Electric Power Research Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-NE-0000593, 2014) 60 p.
S. Saltzstein, K. Sorenson, B. Hanson, and P. Swift, US DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation R&D Activities (proc. IHLRWM2017, 2017) p. 90–97.
S.J. Maheras, R.E. Best, S.B. Ross, K.A. Buxton, J.L. England, P.E. McConnell, L.M. Massaro, P.J. Jensen, Preliminary Evaluation of Removing Used Nuclear Fuel from Shutdown Sites (U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project SFWD-IWM-2017-000024, PNNL-22676 Rev. 10, 2017) 452 p.
AREVA Federal Services LLC, Design and Prototype Fabrication of Railcars for Transport of High-Level Radioactive Material. Phase 1: Mobilization and Conceptual Design (prepared by AREVA Federal Services LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-NE-0008390, 2016) 373 p.
Stockman, C. and E. Kalinina, Cooling Times for Storage and Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque NM, SAND NO. 2013-2013P, 2013) 10 p.
SKB (Svensk Kämbränslehantering AB), Long-Term Safety for the Final Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel at Forsmark: Main Report of the SR-Site Project Volume 1 (Technical Report TR-11-01, 2011), 270 p.
Posiva Oy, Safety Case for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel at Olkiluoto—Synthesis 2012 (POSIVA 2012-12, 2012) 324 p.
ANDRA (Agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs), Dossier 2005: Argile. Tome: Safety Evaluation of a Geological Repository (English translation: original documentation written in French remains ultimately the reference documentation, 2005), 784 p.
E.L. Hardin, L. Price, E. Kalinina, T. Hadgu, A. Ilgen, C Bryan, J. Scaglione, K. Banerjee, J. Clarity, R. Jubin, V. Sobes, R. Howard, J. Carter, T. Severynse, and F. Perry, Summary of Investigations on Technical Feasibility of Direct Disposal of Dual-Purpose Canisters (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition FCRD-UFD-2015-000129 Rev 0, 2015) 117 p.
E. Hardin, J. Blink, H. Greenberg M. Sutton, M. Fratoni, J. Carter, M. Dupont, R. Howard, Generic Repository Design Concepts and Thermal Analysis (FY11) (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Used Nuclear Fuel Disposition FCRD-USED-2011-0002143 Rev. 2, 2011) 272 p.
AREVA Federal Services LLC, Task Order 12—Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Feasibility Study (prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. A&AS DE-NE-0000291, RPT-3008097-000, 2013) 143 p.
Energy Solutions, NAC International, Exelon Nuclear Partners, Booz Allen Hamilton, Talisman International LLC, Terranear PMC, and Sargent and Lundy LLC, Task Order 12: Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Feasibility Study (prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Management, 2013) 239 p.
Energy Solutions, NAC International, Exelon Nuclear Partners, and Booz Allen Hamilton, Task Order 21: Operational Requirements for Standardized Dry Fuel Canister Systems, Updated Final Report (prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Management, 2015) 224 p.
Energy Solutions, NAC International, Exelon Nuclear Partners, Booz Allen Hamilton, Talisman International LLC, Petersen Incorporated, Task Order 18: Generic Design for Small Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Systems, Updated Final Report (prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Management, 2015) 317 p.
J. Jarrell, R. Joseph, R. Howard, R. Hale, G. Petersen, B. Wilkerson, J. Fortner, E. Kalinina, Initial Standardized Canister System Evaluation (U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project FCRD-NFST-2014-000084, Rev. 1, ORNL/LTR-2014-330, 2015), 112 p.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Performance Specification for Standardized Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister Systems (U.S. Department of Energy Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project FCRD-NFST-2014-000579, Rev. 2, ORNL/SPR-2015/251, 2015) 40 p.
R. M. Cumberland, K.A. Williams, J.J. Jarrell, R. A. Joseph III, Cost Sensitivity Analysis for Consolidated Interim Storage of Spent Fuel: Evaluating the Effect of Economic Environment Parameters, (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Management FCRD-NFST-2016-000721, Rev. 1, ORNL/SR-2016/681 2016) 26 p.
J. Jarrell, J., R. Joseph, R. Howard, G. Petersen, R. Cumberland, M. Nutt, J. Carter, and T. Cotton, Cost Implications of an Interim Storage Facility in the Waste Management System (U.S. Department of Energy FCRD-NFST-2015-000648 Rev.1 ONRL/TM-2015/18, 2016) 46 p.
R.P. Rechard, L.L. Price, and E.A. Kalinina, Integrating Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from Generation to Disposal (Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM USA, SAND2015-5503, 2015), 45 p.
International Energy Agency, Potential Interface Issues in Spent Fuel Management, (IAEA-TECDOC-1774, 2015), 172 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bonano, E.J., Kalinina, E.A. & Swift, P.N. The Need for Integrating the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle in the United States of America. MRS Advances 3, 991–1003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2018.231
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2018.231