Skip to main content
Log in

Void distribution and susceptibility differences in ceramic materials using MRI

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is applied to porous ceramic materials to study structural properties. In ceramics, processing differences create inhomogeneous binder distribution in the materials which can cause the formation of regions with differing densities and voids. These defects can be observed with MRI using solvent permeation. Fractional porosity obtained by using image intensity measurements and weight gain due to solvent permeation can be correlated. Dark regions in the image are due to defects such as closed voids, pockets of binder, or agglomerates. Defects such as voids or agglomerates usually have different magnetic susceptibilities. This difference causes artifacts in the image. By exploiting the increase in signal loss using a gradient-echo sequence, apparent enhancement of voids in ceramics is achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Mansfield and P. G. Morris, Adv. Magn. Reson. Suppl. 2 (1982).

  2. C. Chang and R. A. Komoroski, Macromolecules 22, 600 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. D. Hoff, C. Hall, R. J. Gummerson, R. Hawkes, G. N. Holland, and W.S. Moore, Nature 281, 56 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. B. A. Baldwin, W. S. Yamanashi, and P. D. Lester, Magn. Reson. Imag. 3, 180 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. P. C. Wang and S. J. Chang, Wood Fiber Sci. 308 (1986).

  6. D. G. Cory, J. C. deBoer, and W. S. Veeman, Macromolecules 22, 1618 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. N. Garroway, D. G. Cory, J. B. Miller, and R. Turner, Mol. Phys. 70 (2), 331 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. M. Ludecke, P. Roschmann, and R. Tischler, Magn. Reson. Imag. 3, 329 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Ericsson, A. Hemmingsson, B. Jung, and G. O. Sperber, Phys. Med. Biol. 33, 1103 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Posse and W. P. Aue, J. Magn. Res. 88, 473 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. D. Kapadia, Ph.D. Thesis (1990).

  12. E. M. Haacke, Radiology 170, 457 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. F. Czervionke, D. L. Daniels, F. W. Wehrli, L. P. Mark, L. E. Hendrix, J. A. Strandt, A. L. Williams, and V. M. Haughton, AJNR 9, 1149 (November/December 1988).

  14. J. Frahm, K. D. Merbodldt, and W. Hanicke, Magn. Reson. Med. 6, 474 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. L. Ackerman, W. A. Ellingson, J. D. Weyand, R. A. Dimilia, and L. Garrido, “Characterization of Porosity in Green State and Partially Densified A12O3 by NMRI”, Ceramic Engineering and Science Proc. 11th Ann. Conf. January 18–21, 1987.

  16. E. M. Bellon, E. M. Haacke, P. E. Coleman, D. C. Sacco, D. A. Steiger, and R. E. Gangarosa, AJR 147, 1271 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallner, A.S., Ritchey, W.M. Void distribution and susceptibility differences in ceramic materials using MRI. Journal of Materials Research 8, 655–661 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1993.0655

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1993.0655

Navigation