Abstract
Species richness in an assemblage is frequently used as a measure of biological diversity. However, observed species richness is strongly dependent on sample size. If more samples are collected, then more species are observed. Non-parametric species richness estimators, such as the jackknife 1 and 2 and the Chao 1 and 2, are indicated in the literature as potential solutions to the problem of dependence of observed species richness on sampling effort. These methods are intended to estimate the total species richness in an area or assemblage with small sampling effort. Non-parametric estimators are based on the number of species observed, and the number of rare species in a sample, i.e., that occurred in one and/or two sampling units, or with one and/or two individuals. High estimates are produced when samples contain large proportions of rare species. Using a range of real datasets, 1 show that estimates produced by non-parametric methods are generally dependent on observed species richness. An implicit assumption of these non-parametric techniques is that the rare species curve should present high values at small sample sizes and decreasing values as sampling effort is increased. This assumption was observed in only one out of eight datasets presented. Instead, the rare species curve generally flattens off around a constant value as sampling effort increases. I conclude that non-parametric estimators are not reliable to estimate species richness in an assemblage when the rare species curve does not show a decreasing trend. Comments are made on the possibilities of using non-parametric estimators in the comparison of species assemblages.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bini, L.M., S.M. Thomaz and D.C. Souza 2001. Species richness and β-diversity of aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Paraná River floodplain. Arch. Hydrobiol. 151:511–525.
Brown, K.S.Jr. and A.V.L. Freitas 2000. Atlantic forest butterflies: indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32:934–956.
Burnham, K.P. and W.S. Overton 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65:625–633.
Butler, B.J. and R.L. Chazdon 1998. Species richness, spatial variation, and abundance of the soil seed bank of a secondary tropical rain forest. Biotropica 30:214–222.
Chao, A 1984. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11:265–270.
Chao, A 1987. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791.
Chazdon, R.L., R.K. Colwell, J.S. Denslow and M.R. Guariguata. 1998. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forest of northeastern Costa Rica. In: F. Dallmeier and J. A. Comiskey (eds.), Forest Biodiversity Research, Monitoring and Modeling: Conceptual Background and Old World Case Studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris. pp. 285–309.
Chiarucci, A., N.J. Enright, G.L.W. Perry, B.P. Miller and B.B. Lamont 2003. Performance of nonparametric species richness estimators in a high diversity plant community. Div. Distrib. 9:283–295.
Coddington, J.A., C.E. Griswold, D.S. Dávila, E. Peńaranda and S.F. Larcher. 1991. Designing and testing sampling protocols to estimate biodiversity in tropical ecosystems. In: E. C. Dudley (ed.), The Unity of Evolutionary Biology: Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematics and Evolutionary Biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland. pp. 44–60.
Colwell, R. K. 1997. Estimates: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User’s Guide and application published at: http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates
Colwell, R.K. and J.A. Coddington 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 345:101–118.
Condit, R., S.P. Hubbell, J.V. Lafrankie, R. Sukumar, N. Manokaran, R.B. Foster and P.S. Ashton 1996. Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50-ha plots. J. Ecol. 84:549–562.
Fisher, R.A., A.S. Corbet and C.B. Williams 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J. Anim. Ecol. 12:42–58.
Fisher, B.L. 1999a. Ant diversity patterns along an elevational gradient in the Réserve Naturelle Intégrale d’Andohahela, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zoology (n.s.) 94:129–147.
Fisher, B.L. 1999b. Improving inventory efficiency: a case study of leaf-litter ant diversity in Madagascar. Ecol. Appl. 9:714–731.
Gotelli, N.J. and R.K. Colwell 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4:379–391.
Grassle, J.F. and N.J. Maciolek 1992. Deep-sea species richness: regional and local diversity estimates from quantitative bottom samples. Am. Nat. 139:313–341.
Hellmann, J.J. and G.W. Fowler 1999. Bias, precision, and accuracy of four measures of species richness. Ecol. Appl. 9:824–834.
Keating, K.A. and J.F. Quinn 1998. Estimating species richness: the Michaelis-Menten model revisited. Oikos 81:411–416.
Longino, J.T., J. Coddington and R.K. Colwell 2002. The ant fauna of a tropical rain forest: estimating species richness three different ways. Ecology 83:689–702.
Magurran, A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Croom Helm, London.
Magurran, A.E. and P.A. Henderson 2003. Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422:714–716.
Melo, A.S. and C.G. Froehlich. 2001a. Evaluation of methods for estimating macroinvertebrates species richness using individual stones in tropical streams. Freshwater Biol. 46:711–721.
Melo, A.S. and C.G. Froehlich. 2001b. Macroinvertebrates in neotropical streams: richness patterns along a catchment and assemblage structure between 2 seasons. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 20:1–16.
Melo, A.S., R.A.S. Pereira, A.J. Santos, G.J. Shepherd, G. Machado, H.F. Medeiros and R.J. Sawaya 2003. Comparing species richness among assemblages using sample units: why not use extrapolation methods to standardize different sample sizes? Oikos 101:398–410.
Minshall, G.W., R.C.J. Petersen and CF. Nimz 1985. Species richness in streams of different size from the same drainage basin. Am. Nat. 125:16–38.
Novotný, V. and Y. Basset 2000. Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89:564–572.
Oliver, I. and A.J. Beattie 1996. Invertebrates morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv. Biol. 10:99–109.
Palmer, M.W 1990. The estimation of species richness by extrapolation. Ecology 71:1195–1198.
Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie 2001. Estimation of species richness based on species range. Community Ecol. 2:209–211.
Southwood, T.R.E. 1978. Ecological Methods. Chapman and Hall, New York.
Stout, J. and J. Vandermeer 1975. Comparison of species richness for stream-inhabiting insects in tropical and mid-latitude streams. Am. Nat. 109:263–280.
Taylor, L.R., R.A. Kempton and I.P. Woiwod 1976. Diversity statistics and the Log-Series model. J. Anim. Ecol. 45:255–272.
Toti, D.S., F.A. Coyle and J.A. Miller 2000. A structured inventory of Appalachian grass bald and heath bald spider assemblages and a test species richness estimator performance. J. Arachnol 28:329–345.
Wagner, H.H. and O. Wildi 2002. Realistic simulation of the effects of abundance distribution and spatial heterogeneity on non-parametric estimators of species richness. Ecoscience 9:241–250.
Walther, B.A. and J.-L. Martin 2001. Species richness estimation of bird communities: how to control for sampling effort? Ibis 143:413–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Melo, A.S. A critique of the use of jackknife and related non-parametric techniques to estimate species richness. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 5, 149–157 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.5.2004.2.1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.5.2004.2.1