Abstract
Evenness is generally regarded as the constituent of species diversity which is independent of species richness. The group of most popular evenness indices has recently changed, following the influential work of Smith and Wilson (1996). My first point is to argue that this work failed to define coherently what evenness should be and thus advocated the use of indices of different nature. Instead, I propose to use the Lorenz partial order to choose indices that have a behaviour compatible with it. I then suggest a list of such evenness indices and build four series of “new” evenness indices. Finally, I discuss the interest of the Lorenz partial order and of the various evenness indices that are compatible with it.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bulla, L. 1994. An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70: 167–171.
Camargo, J. A. 1993. Must dominance increase with the number of subordinate species in competitive interactions? J. Theoret. Biol. 161: 537–542.
Dalton, H. 1920. The measurement of the inequality of incomes. Economic J. 30:348–361.
Drobner, U., J. Bibby, B. Smith, and J. B. Wilson. 1998. The relation between community biomass and evenness: what does community theory predict, and can these predictions be tested? Oikos 82: 295–302.
Engen, S. 1979. Some basic concepts of ecological equitability. In: J. F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taille (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD. pp. 37–50.
Gerard, R. W. 1965. Intelligence, information and education. Science 148: 762–765.
Godron, M., P. Daget, J. Poissonnet, and P. Poissonnet. 1971. Some aspects of heterogeneity in grasslands of Cantal (France). In: G. P. Patil, E. C. Pielou and W. E. Walters (eds.), Many Species Populations, Ecosystems, and Systems Analysis. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA. pp. 397–415.
Hill, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–431.
Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological Methodology. Benjamin/Cumings, Addison-Wesley Longman Educational Publishers, New York.
Kvalseth, T O. 1991. Note on biological diversity, evenness, and homogeneity measures. Oikos 62: 123–127.
Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76: 5–13.
Liu, Q. 1995. A model for species diversity monitoring at community level and its application. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 34: 271–287.
Marshall, A. W., and I. Olkin. 1979. Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Academic Press, New York.
Mcintosh, R. P. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity. Ecology 48: 392–404.
Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56: 319–323.
Nijs, I. and J. Roy. 2000. How important are species richness, species evenness and interspecific differences to productivity? A mathematical model. Oikos 88: 57–66.
Nijssen, D., R. Rousseau and P. Van Hecke. 1998. The Lorenz curve: a graphical representation of evenness. Coenoses 13: 33–38.
Patil, G. P. and C. Taillie. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 77: 548–561.
Rényi, A. 1961. On measures of entropy and information. In: J. Neyman (ed.), 4rth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 547–561.
Ricotta, C., E. de Zuliani, A. Pacini and G. C. Avena. 2001. On the mutual relatedness of evenness measures. Community Ecol. 2: 51–56.
Rousseau, R. 1999. Measuring biodiversity. Acta Biotheoretica 47: 1–5.
Rousseau, R., P. Van Hecke, D. Nijsen and J. Bogaert. 1999. The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6: 211–223.
Routledge, R. D. 1979. Diversity indices: which ones are admissible? J. Theoret. Biol. 76: 503–515.
Routledge, R. D. 1983. Evenness indices: are any admissible? Oikos 40: 149–151.
Smith, B. and J. B. Wilson. 1996. A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76: 70–82.
Taillie, C. 1979. Species equitability: a comparative approach. In: J. F. Grassle, G. P. Patil, W. Smith and C. Taille (eds.). Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Co-operative Publishing House, Fairland, MD. pp. 51–62.
Tokeshi, M. 1993. Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv. Ecol. Res. 24: 112–186.
Weiher, E. and P. A. Keddy. 1999. Relative abundance and evenness patterns along diversity and biomass gradients. Oikos 87: 355–361.
Wilsey, B. R. and C. Potvin. 2000. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: importance of species evenness in an old field. Ecology 81: 887–892.
Wilson, J. B., J. B. Steel, W. M. King and H. Gitay. 1999. The effect of spatial scale on evenness. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 463–468.
Acknowledgements
I thank very much Carlo Ricotta, Béla Tóthmérész, Michel Godron, Frédéric Archaux and Ronald Rousseau for their comments on the manuscript. The work was funded by the French Ministry of Environment (MATE) and ECOFOR (GIP Ecofor).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Gosselin, F. Lorenz partial order: the best known logical framework to define evenness indices. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 2, 197–207 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.2.7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.2.7