Skip to main content
Log in

On the mutual relatedness of evenness measures

  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several evenness measures have been proposed for quantifying the distribution of abundance among community species, but none seems to be generally preferred. Since these measures have the common objective of summarizing community structure, they may be expected to be intercorrelated. In this paper, seven standard measures of evenness were calculated for 65 sample plots of ruderal vegetation within the archaeological sites of Paestum and Venosa (southern Italy). Principal component analysis was used to identify the primary aspects of community structure being characterized by these seven indices. The first two principal components explained 96% of total variance. A comparison of the first two principal components with the analyzed measures of evenness provides insight into what aspects of community structure they are expressing. While the first principal component is most sensitive to the relative abundances of rare species, the second principal component is clearly associated to changes in the abundance of the dominant community species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PCA:

Principal Component Analysis

References

  • Alatalo, R.V. 1981. Problems in the measurement of evenness in ecology. Oikos 37:199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak, S.C., A.T. Balaban, G.D. Grunwald and B.D. Gute 2000. Topological indices: their nature and mutual relatedness. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40:891–898.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulla, L. 1994. An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70:167–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, J.A. 1992. Can dominance influence stability in competitive interactions? Oikos 64:605–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X.S. and L. Orlóci 1993. Comparative diversity analysis of vegetation. Abstr. Bot. 17:79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M.O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, J. 1989. A calibrated index for the measurement of evenness. Oikos 56:319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G.P and C. Taillie 1979. An overview of diversity. In: J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W.K. Smith and C. Tailli. (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, MD, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie, C. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 11: 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J. 1993. Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. A Methodological Guide to SYN-TAX Package. Ecological Computations Series, Vol. 6. SPB Publishing, The Hague.

  • Rényi, A. 1970. Probability Theory. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta, C. and G.C. Avena 2000. A parametric index of community evenness. Ecoscience 7:511–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutters, K.H., R.V. O’Neill, C.T Hunsaker, J.D. Wickham, D.H. Yankee, S.P. Timmins, K.B. Jones and B.L. Jackson. 1995. A factor analysis of community pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol. 10:23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R., P. van Hecke, D. Nijssen and J. Bogaer. 1999. The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 6:211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Routledge, R.D. 1983. Evenness indices: are any admissible? Oikos 40:149–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A.L. 1969. Equitability indices: dependence on the species count. Ecology 50:466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and J.B. Wilson 1996. A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76:70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taillie, C. 1979. Species equitability: a comparative approach. In: J.F. Grassle, G.P. Patil, W.K. Smith and C. Tailli. (eds.), Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice. International Cooperative Publishing House, Fairland, MD, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Ricotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ricotta, C., De Zuliani, E., Pacini, A. et al. On the mutual relatedness of evenness measures. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 2, 51–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.2.2001.1.6

Keywords

Navigation