Abstract
There are many different metrics for expressing the dissimilarity between two samples or plots. The large majority of these dissimilarity measures attempt to summarize different aspects of plot-to-plot dissimilarity based either on species presences and absences within plots or on species abundances. Here, we propose a new parametric measure of plot-to-plot functional dissimilarity that incorporates information about the degree of functional dissimilarity between species. This measure is obtained from the combination of Hurlbert’s ‘expected species diversity’ with one dissimilarity coefficient of the ‘Bray-Curtis family’ and calculates the expected functional dissimilarity between the species in plot A and their functional nearest neighbors in plot B if m individuals are chosen randomly with replacement from each of the two plots. Due to its parametric nature, the proposed measure has a different sensitivity to the presence of rare and abundant species within plots as a function of the selected parameter value.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bray, J.R. and J.T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27: 325–349.
Champely, S. and D. Chessel. 2002. Measuring biological diversity using Euclidean metrics. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 9: 167–177.
Chao, A., R.L. Chazdon, R.K. Colwell and T.J. Shen. 2005. A new statistical approach for assessing similarity of species composition with incidence and abundance data. Ecol. Lett. 8: 148–159.
Chapin, F.S., E.S. Zavelata, V.T. Eviner, R.L. Naylor, P.M. Vitousek, H.L. Reynolds, D.U. Hooper, S. Lavorel, O.E. Sala, S.E. Hobbie, M.C. Mack and S. Díaz. 2000. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405: 234–242.
Clarke, K.R., P.J. Somerfield and M.G. Chapman. 2006. On resemblance measures for ecological studies, including taxonomic dissimilarities and a zero-adjusted Bray–Curtis coefficient for denuded assemblages. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 330: 55–80.
Clarke, K.R. and R.M. Warwick. 1998. Quantifying structural redundancy in ecological communities. Oecologia 113: 278–289.
Cornelissen, J.H.C., A. Lavorel, E. Garnier, S. Díaz, N. Buchmann, D.E. Gurvich, P.B. Reich, H. ter Steege, H.D. Morgan, M.G.A. van der Heijden, J.G. Pausas and H. Poorter. 2003. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Austr. J. Bot. 51: 335–380.
Díaz, S. et al. 2004. The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents. J. Veg. Sci. 15: 295–304.
Diekmann, M. 2003. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology - a review. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 493–506.
Garnier, E., J. Cortez, G. Billès, M.L. Navas, C. Roumet,M. Debuss-che, G. Laurent, A. Blanchard, D. Aubry, A. Bellmann, C. Neill and J.P. Toussaint. 2004. Plant functional markers capture ecosystem properties during secondary succession. Ecology 85: 2630–2637.
Gower, J.C. 1971. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27: 857–874.
Grassle, J.F. and W. Smith. 1976. A similarity measure sensitive to the contribution of rare species and its use in investigation of variation in marine benthic communities. Oecologia 25: 13–22.
Grime, J.P. 1998. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J. Ecol. 86: 902–910.
Hooper, D.U., F.S. Chapin, J.J Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. La-vorel, J. H. Lawton, D.M. Lodge, M. Loreau, S. Naeem, B. Schmid, H. Setälä , A.J. Symstad, J. Vandermeer and D.A. Wardle. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75: 3–35.
Hurlbert, S.H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52: 577–586.
Izsák C. and R.G. Price. 2001. Measuring β-diversity using a taxo-nomic similarity index, and its relation to spatial scale. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 215: 69–77.
Izsák, J. 1999. Notes on asymmetrical similarity indices. Oikos 84: 343–345.
Jaccard, P. 1900. Contribution au problème de l’immigration post-glaciare de la flore alpine. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 36: 87–130.
Legendre, P. and M.J. Anderson. 1999. Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multispecies responses in multifactorial ecological experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 69: 1–24.
Legendre P. and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL.
Lepš, J., F. de Bello, S. Lavorel and S. Berman. 2006. Quantifying and interpreting functional diversity of natural communities: practical considerations matter. Preslia 78: 481–501.
Loreau, M.,S. Naeem and P. Inchausti. 2002. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning. Synthesis and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Mokany, K., J. Ash and S. Roxburgh. 2008. Functional identity is more important than diversity in influencing ecosystem processes in a temperate native grassland. J. Ecol. 96: 884–893.
Moretti, M. and C. Legg. 2009. Combining plant and animal traits to assess community functional responses to disturbance. Ecogra-phy 32: 299–309.
Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. (E) 3: 64–80.
Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie. 1982. Diversity as a concept and its measurement. J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77: 548–567.
Pavoine, S., J. Vallet, A.B. Dufour, S. Gachet and H. Daniel. 2009. On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity. Oikos 118: 391–402.
Petchey, OL. and K.J. Gaston. 2006. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol. Lett. 9: 741–758.
Petchey, O.L., A. Hector and K.J. Gaston. 2004. How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85: 847–857.
Podani, J. 1999. Extending Gower’s general coefficient of similarity to ordinal characters. Taxon 48: 331–340.
Podani, J. 2000. Introduction to the Exploration of Multivariate Biological Data. Backhuys, Leiden, NL.
Podani, J. 2005. Multivariate exploratory analysis of ordinal data in ecology: pitfalls, problems and solutions. J. Veg. Sci. 16: 497–510.
Podani, J. and D. Schmera. 2006. On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115: 179–185.
Rao, C.R. 1982. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: a unified approach. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21: 24–43.
Ricotta, C. 2005a. A note on functional diversity measures. Basic Appl. Ecol. 6: 479–486.
Ricotta, C. 2005b. On parametric diversity indices in ecology: A historical note. Community Ecol. 6: 241–244.
Ricotta, C. and S. Burrascano. 2008. Beta diversity for functional ecology. Preslia 80: 61–71.
Routledge, R.D. 1983. Evenness indices: are any admissible? Oikos 40: 149–151.
Smith, W. 1989. ANOVA-like similarity analysis using expected species shared. Biometrics 45: 873–881.
Sørensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application in analysis of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. 5: 1–34.
Tilman, D. 2001. Functional diversity. In: Levin, S.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 109–120.
Tilman, D., J. Knops, D. Wedin, P.B. Reich, M. Ritchie and E. Siemann. 1997. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277: 1300–1302.
Tóthmérész, B. 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6: 283–290.
Villéger, S., N.W.H. Mason and D. Mouillot. 2008. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology 89: 2290–2301.
Waldbusser, G.G., R.L. Marinelli, R.B. Whitlatch and P.T. Visscher. 2004. The effectsof infaunal biodiversity on biogeochemistry of coastal marine sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49: 1482–1492.
Whittaker, R.H. 1972. Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ricotta, C., Bacaro, G. On plot-to-plot dissimilarity measures based on species functional traits. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 11, 113–119 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.16
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ComEc.11.2010.1.16