Abstract
To avoid the problems associated with the Euclidean distance for the calculation of plot-to-plot dissimilarity, a variety of alternative measures have been proposed. Among them, the chord and the Hellinger distances are both obtained by first transforming separately the species abundances in each plot vector and then by calculating the Euclidean distance on the chord-transformed or the Hellinger-transformed data. However, although both measures are routinely used by ecologists as substitutes for the Euclidean distance, they have very different properties. In this paper, using a modified version of Dalton’s principle of transfers, I will show that, unlike the Euclidean distance, the chord and the Hellinger distances are not monotonic to changes in absolute abundances. Therefore, they are not interchangeable with the Euclidean distance. The moral of this story is that although dissimilarity may appear an intuitively simple concept, the properties of even the best-known indices are not fully understood. Therefore, a clear understanding of old and new coefficients is needed to evaluate their ability to highlight relevant aspects of compositional dissimilarity among plots.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Dalton, H. 1920. Measurement of the inequality of incomes. Econ. J. 30:348–361.
Gower, J.C. and P. Legendre. 1986. Metric and Euclidean properties of dissimilarity coefficients. J. Classif. 3:5–48.
Hajdu, L.J. 1981. Graphical comparison of resemblance measures in phytosociology. Vegetatio 48:47–59.
Jaynes, E. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106:620–630.
Juhász-Nagy, P. 1984. Spatial dependence of plant populations. Part 2. A family of new models. Acta Bot. Hung. 30:363–402.
Koleff, P., K.J. Gaston and J.J. Lennon. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J. Anim. Ecol. 72:367–382.
Legendre, P. and M. De Cáceres. 2013. Beta diversity as the variance of community data: Dissimilarity coefficients and partitioning. Ecol. Lett. 16:951–963.
Legendre, P. and E.D. Gallagher. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271–280.
Mouquet, N. and M. Loreau. 2003. Community patterns in sourcesink metacommunities. Am. Nat. 162:544–557.
Orlóci, L. 1967. An agglomerative method for classification of plant communities. J. Ecol. 55:193–206.
Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research. 2nd ed. Junk, The Hague, NL.
Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132:652–661.
Ricotta, C. 2017. Of beta diversity, variance, evenness, and dissimilarity. Ecol. Evol. 7:4835–4843.
Ricotta, C. and J. Podani. 2017. On some properties of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and their ecological meaning. Ecol. Complex. 31:201–205.
Roberts, D.W. 2017. Distance, dissimilarity, and mean-variance ratios in ordination. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8:1398–1407.
Sherwin, W.B., F. Jabot, R. Rush, and M. Rossetto. 2006. Measurement of biological information with applications from genes to landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 15:2857–2869.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ricotta, C. Can we trust the chord (and the Hellinger) distance?. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 20, 104–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.1.11
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.1.11