Abstract
Low velocity surface layers can significantly increase ground accelerations during earthquakes. When saturated sandy sediments are present, because of pore pressure increase, decrease of soil strength or even liquefaction can occur. Some volume change follows the dissipation of excess pore pressure after the earthquake resulting surface settlements. To determine the liquefaction probability and post-liquefaction settlement is very important for critical facilities e.g. for the site of Paks Nuclear Power Plant, Hungary. Pore pressure increase and so the liquefaction and surface settlements depend on the characteristics of seismic loading and soil parameters. To quantify the extent of these phenomena is rather difficult. Uncertainties arise both from the probabilistic nature of the earthquake loading and from the simplifications of soil models as well. In the paper, the most important semi-empirical and dynamical effective stress methods for liquefaction and post-liquefaction settlement assessment are summarized. Most significant contributors to the uncertainties are highlighted, and particular examples through the investigation of Paks NPP site are given. Finally, a probabilistic procedure is proposed where the uncertainties will be taken into account by applying a logic tree methodology. At the same time, the uncertainties are reduced by the use of site-specific UHRS and stress reduction factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrus R, Stokoe K 1997: In: Proceedings NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 1996, Salt Lake City, 97, 89–128.
Ansal A, Tönük G 2007: In: Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. 4th International Conference on earthquake Geotechnical engineering-Invited Lectures, Springer, Dordrecht, 73–92.
Byrne P 1991: In: Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Missouri, 47–55.
Cetin K, Bile H, Wu J, AM K, RB S 2009: J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg., 135, 387–398.
Cetin K, Seed R, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder L, Kayen R, Moss R, 2004: J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg., 130, 1314–1340.
Győri E 2004: Effects of loose surface layers to accelerations caused by earthquakes: Application of methods in Hungary (in Hungarian). Ph.D. Thesis, Budapest, ELTE TTK Földtudományi Doktori Iskola
Győri E, Tóth L, Katona T 2002a: In: In: Earthquake Safety of Hungary (in Hungarian). Earthquake Engineering Conference, Győr, 267–283.
Győri E, Tóth L, Mónus P, Zsíros T, Katona T 2002b: Geoph. Res. Abstracts, 4, ES 5.05.
Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N, Bommer J, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R 2006: J. Earthq. Engrg., 10, No. 1, 67–90.
Idriss I 1999: In: Proceedings TRB Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction. Publication No. FHWA-RD-99-165, Federal Highway Administration, Washington
Idriss I, Boulanger R 2004: Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering and the 3rd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 2004, Berkeley, California, 32–56.
International Atomic Energy Agency 2004: Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations for Nuclear Power Plants: Safety Guide. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
Ishihara K, Yoshimine M 1992: Soils and Foundations, 32, No. 1, 173–188.
Juang C, Fang S, Khor E 2006: J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg., 132, 337–350.
Lee M, Finn W 1997: DESRA-2C: Dynamic effective stress response analysis of soil deposits with energy transmitting boundary including assessment of liquefaction potential. Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of British Columbia
Liao S, Lum K 1998: In: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics III (GSP 75), 410–421.
Liao S, Veneziano D, Whitman R 1988: J. Geotech. Engrg., 114, 389–411.
Martin G, Finn W, Seed H 1975: J. Geotech. Engrg. Division, 101, 423–438.
Moss R, Seed R, Kayen R, Stewart J, Der Kiureghian A, KO C 2006: J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg., 132, 1032–1051.
Ove Arup & Partners 1995: Paks NPP Site Ivestigation for Site Response and Liquefaction Potential. Report, Archives, Paks NPP
Ove Arup & Partners 1996: PHARE Regional Programme Nuclear Safety. Project No. 4.2.1 VVER 440-213 Seismic Hazard Reevaluation, Contract No. 94-0600, Report, Archives, Paks NPP
Robertson P 2009: In: Proceedings of IS-Tokyo, International Conference on Performance-based design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering-from case history to practice. Tokyo
Robertson P, Wride C F 1998: Canadian Geotech. J., 35, 3, 442–459.
Seed H, Idriss I 1971: J. of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97, 1249–1273.
Seed H, Idriss I 1982: Ground motion and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, Canada
Seed H B, Tokimatsu K, Harder L F, Chung R M 1984: The Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations. EERC Report No. UCB/EERC-84/15, University of California at Berkeley
Seed H B, Tokimatsu K, Harder L F, Chung R M 1985: J. Geotech. Engrg., 111, 1425–1445.
Seed R, Cetin K, Moss R, Kammerer A, Wu J, Pestana J, Riemer M, Sancio R, Bray J, Kayen R et al. 2003: In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar, Long Beach, CA
Shamoto Y, Zhang J, Tokimatsu K 1998: Soils and Foundations, 38, 69–83.
Silver M, Seed H 1971: J. of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97, 1171–1182.
Tokimatsu K, Seed H 1984: Simplified procedures for the evaluation of settlements in clean sands. University of California at Berkeley, Report No. UCB/EERC-84/16
Tokimatsu K, Seed H 1987: J. Geotech. Engrg., 113, 861–878.
Toprak S, Holzer T, Bennett M, Tinsley J 1999: In: Proceedings of the Seventh US-Japan Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures Against Soil Liquefaction. Seattle, 69–86.
Tóth L, Balogh J, Bus Z, Dombrádi E, Grenerczy G, Győri E, Horváth F, Kiszely M, Mónus P, Schweitzer F, Szeidovitz G, Zsíros T 2008: Reevaluation of earthquake hazard and seismic design basis of Paks Nuclear Power Plant (in Hungarian). GeoRisk Ltd., Budapest
US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.198 2003: Procedures and Criteria for Assessing Seismic Soil Liquefaction at Nuclear Power Plant Sites. US NRC, Washington
Wu J, Seed R 2004: In: Proceedings, Fifth International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, New York, Paper 3.09
Youd T, Idriss I eds 1997: In: Proceedings of the NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, 1996, Salt Lake City, 1–41.
Youd T, Idriss I, Andrus R, Arango I, Castro G, Christian J, Dobry R, Finn W, Harder Jr L, Hynes M et al. 2001: J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Engrg., 817–833.
Youd T, Noble S 1997: In: Proc. NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils, 1996, Salt Lake City, 149–165.
Zhang G, Robertson P, Brachman R 2002: Canadian Geotech. J., 39, 1168–1180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Győri, E., Tóth, L., Gráczer, Z. et al. Liquefaction and post-liquefaction settlement assessment — A probabilistic approach. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung 46, 347–369 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.46.2011.3.6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/AGeod.46.2011.3.6