Abstract
Lepidoptera is one of the most diverse orders of insects, their larvae are very abundant in many habitats, and frequent prey of various predators. To decrease predation risk, caterpillars developed several means of defence, among them timing their activity to avoid predators (seeking enemy-free time). Although the enemy-free time hypothesis is often invoked to explain caterpillar behaviour, empirical evidence for it is scarce. We tested whether such enemy-free time exists in a temperate forest by comparing predation pressure on artificial caterpillars during day and night on the ground in forest fragments in Denmark. We found a high predation rate, 23.9%d−1, and higher predation rate at night (30.9%d−0.5) than during the day (17.0%d−0.5), both by invertebrate (23.3%d−0.5 vs. 12.4%d−0.5) and vertebrate (8.5%d−0.5 vs. 3.3%d−0.5) predators. The most important predators were chewing insects (73.4% of all attacks) and small mammals (19.0%). Attack rates on red caterpillars were higher (30.0%d−1) than on green ones (19.5%d−1). Overall, these data do not support the idea that night activity can provide enemy-free time for solitary caterpillars on the temperate forest floor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- GG:
-
Green-Green
- GR:
-
Green-Red
- RR:
-
Red-Red
References
Akaike, H. 1998. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: E. Parzen, K. Tanabe, and G. Kitagawa (eds.), Selected Papers of Hirotugu Akaike. Springer, Berlin. pp. 199–213.
Aronsson, M. and G. Gamberale-Stille. 2009. Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals. Behav. Ecol. 20:1356–1362.
Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 67:1–48.
Bereczki K., P. Ódor, G. Csóka, Z. Mag and A. Báldi. 2014. Effects of forest heterogeneity on the efficiency of caterpillar control service provided by birds in temperate oak forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 327:96–105.
Berger, D. and K. Gotthard. 2008. Time stress, predation risk and diurnal-nocturnal foraging trade-offs in larval prey. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62:1655–1663.
Cain, M.L. 1985. Random search by herbivorous insects: a simulation model. Ecology 66:876–888.
Carroll, J. and T. Sherratt. 2013. A direct comparison of the effectiveness of two anti-predator strategies under field conditions. J Zool. 291:279–285.
Casey, T.M. 1993. Effects of temperature on foraging of caterpillars. In: Stamp, N.E. and T.M. Casey (eds.), Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp. 5–28.
Cronin, T.W., S. Johnsen, N.J. Marshall and E.J. Warrant. 2014. Visual Ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Edwards, P. and S.D. Wratten. 1983. Wound induced defences in plants and their consequences for patterns of insect grazing. Oecologia 59:88–93.
Fabricant, S.A. and M.E. Herberstein. 2014. Hidden in plain orange: aposematic coloration is cryptic to a colorblind insect predator. Behav. Ecol. 26:38–44.
Ferrante, M., G. Barone and G.L. Lövei. 2017. The carabid Pterostichus melanarius uses chemical cues for opportunistic predation and saprophagy but not for finding healthy prey. BioControl 62:741–747.
Ferrante, M., A. Lo Cacciato and G.L. Lövei. 2014. Quantifying predation pressure along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark using artificial caterpillars. Eur. J. Entomol. 111:649–654.
Gittleman, J.L. and P.H. Harvey. 1980. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 286:149–150.
Greeney, H., L. Dyer and A. Smilanich. 2012. Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous: A review of caterpillars’ chemical, physiological, morphological, and behavioral defenses against natural enemies. Invert. Surviv. J. 9:7–34.
Heinrich, B. 1979. Foraging strategies of caterpillars. Oecologia 42: 325–337.
Hossie, T.J. and T. N. Sherratt. 2012. Eyespots interact with body colour to protect caterpillar-like prey from avian predators. Anim. Behav. 84:167–173.
Hossie, T.J. and T. N. Sherratt. 2013. Defensive posture and eyespots deter avian predators from attacking caterpillar models. Anim. Behav. 86:383–389.
Hossie, T.J., J. Skelhorn, J.W. Breinholt, A. Y. Kawahara and T.N. Sherratt. 2015. Body size affects the evolution of eyespots in caterpillars. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112:6664–6669.
Howe, A., G.L. Lövei and G. Nachman. 2009. Dummy caterpillars as a simple method to assess predation rates on invertebrates in a tropical agroecosystem. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 31:325–329.
James, D.G., S. Morgan and A. Sourakov. 2017. The Book of Caterpillars: A Life-Size Guide to Six Hundred Species from around the World. Ivy Press, Brighton, U.K.
Jeffries, M. and J.H. Lawton. 1984. Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23:269–286.
Jones, R. 1977. Search behaviour: a study of three caterpillar species. Behaviour 60:237–259.
Kelbert, A. and L.S.V. Roth. 2006. Nocturnal colour vision — not as rare as we might think. J. Exp. Biol. 209:781–788.
Kenne, M. and A. Dejean. 1999. Diet and foraging activity in Myrmicaria opaciventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Sociobiology 33:171–184.
Lövei, G.L. and M. Ferrante. 2017. A review of the sentinel prey method as a way of quantifying invertebrate predation under field conditions. Insect Sci. 24:528–542.
Lövei, G.L. and K.D. Sunderland. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 231–256.
Low, P.A., K. Sam, C. McArthur, M.R.C. Posa and D.F. Hochuli. 2014. Determining predator identity from attack marks left in model caterpillars: guidelines for best practice. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 152:120–126.
Mansion-Vaquié A., M. Ferrante, S. Cook, J. Pell and G.L. Lövei. 2017. Manipulating field margins to increase predation intensity in fields of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). J. Appl. Entomol. 141:600–611.
Mauricio, R. and M.D. Bowers. 1990. Do caterpillars disperse their damage? Larval foraging behaviour of two specialist herbivores, Euphydryas phaeton (Nymphalidae) and Pieris rapae (Pieridae). Ecol. Entomol. 15:153–161.
McNamara, J.M. and A.I. Houston. 1987. Starvation and predation as factors limiting population size. Ecology 68:1515–1519.
Menzi, U. 1987. Visual adaptation in nocturnal and diurnal ants. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 160:11–21.
Mira, A. and E.A. Bernays. 2002. Trade-offs in host use by Manduca sexta: plant characters vs natural enemies. Oikos 97:387–397.
Mäntylä, E., G.A. Alessio, J.D. Blande, J. Heijari, J.K. Holopainen, T. Laaksonen, P. Piirtola and T. Klemola. 2008. From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. PLoS One 3:e2832.
Mäntylä, E., J.D. Blande, and T. Klemola. 2014. Does application of methyl jasmonate to birch mimic herbivory and attract insectivorous birds in nature? Arthropod-Plant Interact. 8:143–153.
New, T.R. 2013. Lepidoptera and Conservation. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Novotny, V., Y. Basset, J. Auga, W. Boen, C. Dal, P. Drozd, M. Kasbal, B. Isua, R. Kutil and M. Manumbor. 1999. Predation risk for herbivorous insects on tropical vegetation: a search for enemy-free space and time. Austral Ecol. 24:477–483.
Opitz, S.E. and C. Müller. 2009. Plant chemistry and insect sequestration. Chemoecology 19:117–154.
R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Remmel, T., J. Davison and T. Tammaru. 2011. Quantifying predation on folivorous insect larvae: the perspective of life-history evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 104:1–18.
Rowland, H.M., I.C. Cuthill, I.F. Harvey, M.P. Speed and G.D. Ruxton. 2008. Can’t tell the caterpillars from the trees: countershading enhances survival in a woodland. Proc. Roy. Soc Lond. B. 275:2539–2545.
Rowland, H.M., M.P. Speed, G.D. Ruxton, M. Edmunds, M. Stevens and I.F. Harvey. 2007. Countershading enhances cryptic protection: an experiment with wild birds and artificial prey. Anim. Behav. 74:1249–1258.
Ruxton, G.D., T.N. Sherratt and M.P. Speed. 2004. Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals and Mimicry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Salcedo, E., L. Zheng, M. Phistry, E.E. Bagg and S.G. Britt. 2003. Molecular basis for ultraviolet vision in invertebrates. J. Neurosci. 23:10873–10878.
Seifert, C.L., C.H. Schulze, T.C. Dreschke, H. Frötscher and K. Fiedler. 2016. Day vs. night predation on artificial caterpillars in primary rainforest habitats – an experimental approach. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 158:54–59.
Sillén-Tullberg, B. 1985. Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug. Oecologia 67:411–415.
Skelhorn, J., H.M. Rowland, M. P. Speed and G.D. Ruxton. 2010. Masquerade: camouflage without crypsis. Science 327:51–51.
Stevens, M. and G.D. Ruxton. 2012. Linking the evolution and form of warning coloration in nature. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 279: 417–426.
Suzuki, T.N. and R. Sakurai. 2015. Bent posture improves the protective value of bird dropping masquerading by caterpillars. Anim. Behav. 105:79–84.
Théry, M. and D. Gomez. 2010. Insect colours and visual appearance in the eyes of their predators. Adv. Insect Physiol. 38:267–353.
Tvardikova, K. and V. Novotny. 2012. Predation on exposed and leaf-rolling artificial caterpillars in tropical forests of Papua New Guinea. J. Trop. Ecol. 28:331–341.
Warrant, E. and M. Dacke. 2011. Vision and visual navigation in nocturnal insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56:239–254.
Yang, A.S. 2001. Modularity, evolvability, and adaptive radiations: a comparison of the hemi-and holometabolous insects. Evol. Dev. 3:59–72.
Yokoyama, S. and F.B. Radlwimmer. 2001. The molecular genetics and evolution of red and green color vision in vertebrates. Genetics 158:1697–1710.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Flakkebjerg Efterskole for permission to use their land and B. Bonafede and V. Bacle for help during field work. GL thanks P. Coley for introducing him to the artificial caterpillars. This is contribution no. 32 of the AMIGA Project, funded by the European Commission under grant agreement n-289706, and is in partial fulfilment of the PhD requirements at Aarhus University, Denmark (MF). Author contributions: the study was designed by MF, GL, GB, and MV; field work was performed by MF, GB, MV, and EB; data analysis by MF, GL, writing of the paper: MF, GL, with comments from all authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferrante, M., Barone, G., Kiss, M. et al. Ground-level predation on artificial caterpillars indicates no enemy-free time for lepidopteran larvae. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 18, 280–286 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2017.18.3.6