Abstract
The effects of stand structure, tree species composition, proportion of habitat types and land use history on breeding bird assemblages in temperate mixed forests in Western Hungary were studied. The species richness, the abundance and the composition of the whole breeding bird assemblage and of some groups formed on the basis of nesting site and rarity were examined. Stand structural variables had the highest impact on the breeding bird assemblage, while tree species composition, the varying proportion of vegetation types and land use history had no significant effect. In the case of the species richness, the abundance and the composition of the whole assemblage, the most important variables were the mean diameter of trees, the vegetation cover of the forest floor and the dead wood volume. The explained variance in the linear models of different groups varied between 20% and 60%, and the relative importance of these three variables also differed considerably. These results indicate that forest management may considerably influence the diversity and the composition of birds, as all the structural elements affecting birds deeply depend on it. Within the shelterwood management system, the elongation of the rotation and regeneration periods, and the relatively high proportion of retention tree groups after harvest could contribute to the conservation of forest birds. Our results also showed that for the forest bird communities, both the prevalence of big trees and the presence of a dense understory layer are important. Management regimes which apply continuous forest cover might be more appropriate for providing these structural elements simultaneously on small spatial scales, and for the maintenance of a more diverse bird community, thus healthier forest ecosystems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- DBH:
-
Diameter at the Breast Height
References
Angelstam, P. and G. Mikusinski. 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest - a review. Ann. Zool. Fennici 31: 157–172.
Arcanum. 2006. A második magyar katonai felmérés 1806–1869. DVD kiadvány (Secondary Military Survey of the Habsburg Empire 1806–1869, DVD-room). Arcanum Kft, Budapest.
Archaux, F. and N. Bakkaus. 2007. Relative impact of stand structure, tree composition and climate on mountain bird communities. For. Ecol. Manage. 247: 72–79.
Batáry, P., T. Matthiesen and T. Tscharntke. 2010. Landscape-moderated importance of hedges in conserving farmland bird diversity of organic vs. conventional croplands and grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2020–2027.
Bereczki, K., P. Ódor, Gy. Csóka, Zs. Mag, A. and Báldi. 2014. Effects of forest heterogeneity on the efficiency of caterpillar controll service provided by birds in temperate oak forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 327: 96–105.
Birdlife Hungary (MME). 2012. Magyarországon előforduló madárfajok adatbázisa (Database of bird species of Hungary). http://www.mme-monitoring.hu. Accessed 29 November 2012.
Bivand, R., G. Piras. 2015. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Software 63(18): 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v63/i18/.
Borcard, D., F. Gillet and P. Legendre. 2011. Numerical Ecology with R. Springer, New York.
Christensen, M., K. Hahn, E.P Mountford, P. Ódor, T. Standovár, D. Rozenbergar, J. Dijaci, S. Wijdeven, P. Meyer, S. Winter and T. Vrska. 2005. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For. Ecol. Manage. 210: 267–282.
Cushman, S.A. and K. McGarigal. 2004. Patterns in the species-environment relationship depend on both scale and choice of response variables. Oikos 105: 117–124.
Donald, P.F., R.J. Fuller, A.D. Evans and S.J. Gough. 1998. Effects of forest management and grazing on breeding bird communities in plantations of broadleaved and coniferous trees in western England. Biol. Conserv. 85: 183–197.
Dövényi, Z. 2010. Magyarország Kistájainak katasztere. (Cadastre of Hungarian regions). MTA Földrajztudományi Kutatóintézet, Budapest.
EBCC (European Bird Census Council). 2015. Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme (PECBMS). http://www.ebcc.info/pecbm.html. Accessed on 18.09.2015.
Ehrlén, J. and O. Eriksson. 2000. Dispersal limitation and patch occupancy in forest herbs. Ecology 81: 1667–1674.
Endels, P., D. Adriaens, K. Verheyen and M. Hermy. 2004. Population structure and adult plant performance of forest herbs in three contrasting habitats. Ecography 27: 225–241.
Faraway, J.J. 2005. Linear Models with R. Chapman and Hall, London.
Faraway, J.J. 2006. Extending the Linear Model with R. Chapman and Hall, London.
Fernandez-Juricic, E. 2004. Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain). Implications for local and regional bird conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69: 17–32.
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). 2009. State of the world’s forests 2009. Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Communication Divisions, FAO, Rome.
Fournier, E. and M. Loreau. 2001. Respective roles of recent hedges and forest patch remnants in the maintenance of ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in an agricultural landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 16: 17–32.
Fuller, R.J. 1995. Bird Life of Woodland and Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gregory, R.D., D.W. Gibbons and P.F. Donald. 2004. Bird census and survey techniques. In: W.J. Sutherland, I. Newton and R.E. Green (eds), Bird Ecology and Conservation – A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford. pp. 17–56.
Gregory, R.D. and A. van Strien. 2010. Wild bird indicators: using composite population trends of birds as measures of environmental health. Ornithological Science 9: 3–22.
Gyöngyössy, P. 2008. Gyantásország. Történeti adatok az őrségi erdők erdészeti és természetvédelmi értékeléséhez (Historical data to value forests in Őrség with a view to forest management and nature conservation). Kerekerdő Alapítvány, Szombathely
Hagan, J.M. and A.L. Meehan. 2002. The effectiveness of stand-level and landscape-level variables for explaining bird occurrence in an industrial forest. Forest Science 48: 231–242.
Hagemeier, E.J.M. and M.J. Blair (eds). 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. T. & A.D. Poyser, London.
Hanski, I. and M. Walsh. 2004. How Much, How to? Practical Tools for Forest Conservation. Birdlife International, Helsinki.
Hewson, CM., G.M. Austin, S.J. Gough and R.J. Fuller. 2011. Species-specific responses of woodland birds to stand-level habitat characteristics: The dual importance of forest structure and floristics. For. Ecol. Manage. 261: 1224–1240.
Holmes, R.T and J.C Schultz. 1988. Food availability for forest birds: effects of prey distributionand abundance on bird foraging. Can. J. Zool. 66: 720–728.
James, F.C and NO Wamer. 1982. Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63: 159–171.
Jansson, G. and P. Angelstam. 1999. Threshold levels of habitat composition for the presence of the long-tailed tit (Aegithalos cauda-tus) in a boreal landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 14: 283–290.
Király, I. and P. Ódor. 2010. The effect of stand structure and tree species composition on epiphytic bryophytes in mixed deciduous – coniferous forests of Western Hungary. Biol. Conserv. 143: 2063–2069.
Lencinas, M.V., G.M. Pastur, C.B. Anderson and C. Busso. 2008. The value of timber quality forests for insect conservation on Tierra del Fuego Island compared to associated non-timber quality stands. J. Insect Conserv. 12: 461–475.
Lepš, J., and P. Šmilauer. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Loehle, C, T.B. Wigley, S. Rutzmoser, J.A. Gerwin, PD. Keyser, R.A. Lancia, C.Y. Reynolds, R.E. Thill, R. Weih, J.R. Don White and PB. Wood. 2005. Managed forest landscape structure and avian species richness in the southeastern US. For. Ecol. Manage. 214: 279–293.
MacArthur, R.H. and J.W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.
Mag, Zs., T. Szép, K. Nagy and T. Standovár. 2011. Modelling forest bird community richness using CORINE land cover data: a study at the landscape scale in Hungary. Community Ecol. 12: 241–248.
Márialigeti, S., B. Németh, F. Tinya and P. Ódor. 2009. The effects of stand structure on ground-floor bryophyte assemblages in temperate mixed forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 2223–2241.
Melles, S., S. Glenn and K. Martin. 2003. Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: Species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conservation Ecology 7(1): 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss1/art5.
Mikusinski, G. and P. Angelstam. 1998. Economic geography, forest distribution, and woodpecker diversity in Central Europe. Conserv. Biol. 12: 200–208.
Mikusinski, G., M. Gromadzki and P. Chylarecki. 2001. Woodpeckers as indicators of forest bird diversity. Conserv. Biol. 15: 208–217.
Mitchell, M.S., R.A. Lancia and J.A. Gerwin. 2001. Using landscape-level data to predict the distribution of birds on a managed forest: effect of a scale. Ecol. Appl. 11: 1692–1708.
Mitchell, M.S., S. Rutzmoser, T.B. Wigley, C. Loehle, J.A. Gerwin, P.D. Keyser, R.A. Lancia, R.W. Perry, C.Y. Reynolds, R.E. Thill, R. Weih, D. White and P.B. Wood. 2006. Relationships between avian richness and landscape structure at multiple scales using multiple landscapes. For. Ecol. Manage. 221: 155–169.
Moran, P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37: 17–23.
Moskát, Cs. 1987. Estimating bird density in Hungarian deciduous forests. Acta Reg. Soc. Sci. Litt. Gothoburgensis, Zoologica 14: 153–161.
Moskát, Cs. 1988. Breeding bird community and vegetation structure in a beech forest in the Pilis Mountains, N. Hungary. Aquila 95: 105–112.
Moskát, Cs. 1991. Multivariate plexus concept in the study of complex ecological data: an application to the analysis of bird-habitat relationships. Coenoses 6: 79–89.
Moskát, Cs. and A. Báldi. 1999. The importance of edge effect in line transect censuses applied in marshland habitats. Ornis Fennica 76: 33–40.
Moskát, Cs. and T. Fuisz. 1992. Forest Management and bird communities in the beech and oak forests of the Hungarian mountains. In: E.J.M. Hagemeijer and T.J. Verstrael (eds.), Bird Numbers 1992. Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg/Heerlen & SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen.
Moskát, Cs., G. Hraskó and Z. Waliczky. 1988. Species composition and structure of avian communities in the Pilis Mountains, North Hungary. In: J. Török (ed.), Ornithological Researches in the Pilis Biosphere Reserve. Hungarian Ornithological Society, Budapest. pp. 12–20.
Moskát, Cs. and T. Székely. 1989. Habitat distribution of breeding birds in relation to forest succession. Folia Zool. 38: 363–376.
Moskát, Cs. and Z. Waliczky. 1992. Bird-vegetation relationships along ecological gradients: ordination and plexus analysis. Ornis Hungarica 2: 45–60.
Muller, J., J. Stadler and R. Brandl. 2010. Composition versus physiognomy of vegetation as predictors of bird assemblages: The role of lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 114: 490–495.
National Food Chain Safety Office (NÉBIH). 2015. Országos Erdészeti Adattár (Database of Hungarian forests). http://www.nebih.gov.hu/ Accessed 1 March 2015.
Newton, I. 1994. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: A review. Biol. Conserv. 70(3): 265–276.
Podani, J. 2000. Introduction to the Exploration of Multivariate Biological Data. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
Poulsen, B.O. 2002. Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 11: 1551–1566.
R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/ Accessed 01 August 2014.
Rosenvald, R., A. Lohmus, A. Kraut and L. Remm. 2011. Bird communities in hemiboreal old-growth forests: The roles of food supply, stand structure, and site type. For. Ecol. Manage. 262: 1541–1550.
Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Sopp, L. and L. Kolozs. 2000. Fatömegszámítási táblázatok. Állami Erdészeti Szolgálat, Budapest.
ter Braak, C.J.F. and P. Šmilauer. 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca NY, USA.
Tímár, G., P. Ódor and L. Bodonczi. 2002. Az Őrségi Tájvédelmi Körzet erdeinek jellemzése. (The characteristics of forest vegetation of the Őrség Protected Landscape Area). Kanitzia 10: 109–135.
Tinya, F., S. Márialigeti, I. Király, B. Németh and P. Ódor. 2009. The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in Őrség, Western Hungary. Plant Ecology 204: 69–81.
Virkkala, R. and H. Liehu. 1990. Habitat selection by the Siberian Tit Parus cinctus in virgin and managed forests in northern Finland. Ornis Fennica 67: 1–12.
Virkkala, R. 1991. Spatial and temporal variation in bird communities and populations in north-boreal coniferous forests: a multiscale approach. Oikos 62: 59–66.
Wilson, M.W., J. Pithon, T. Gittings, T.C. Kelly, P.S. Giller and J. O’Halloran. 2006. Effects of growth stage and tree species composition on breeding bird assemblages of plantation forests: Capsule Bird species assemblages are strongly dependent on growth stage and forest structure, but do not appear to be greatly affected by tree species composition. Bird Study 53: 225–236.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Mag, Z., Ódor, P. The effect of stand-level habitat characteristics on breeding bird assemblages in Hungarian temperate mixed forests. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 16, 156–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2015.16.2.3