Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the distribution of progressive selection generations in order to define the maximum efficiency of increasing yield in relation to the stage of selection procedure. Experimental procedure lasted five years on open-pollinated lines selected in two contrasting environments under low plant population. Mean grain yield of individual maize plants increased by 79% from C0 to C4 generation in environment A and 32% in environment B. Yield of individual plants was increased by 58% from C0 to C2 when selection was fully practiced in environment B. The progressive reduction of CV values through the selection generations revealed gene fixation and lack of segregation in selected lines which tended to be more uniform and homozygous. Low to medium negative kurtosis and low to medium positive skewness, accompanied by a more “squared” shape of distribution curve may indicate more homozygous genetic material that was categorized in clusters of similar C4 lines as was observed in environment A, depicting the end of selection procedure. In C4, a breeder may choose from the upper part of distribution curve (higher yielding plants) in order to avoid possible selection of deleterious genes at the kurtosis-biased lower part of the distribution curve. Our findings suggested the selection of cultivars of narrow adaptation, because at the initial stages of the selection program the effect of environment lead to different genetic materials, favouring certain genotypes. In our study environment B favoured selection procedure for developing high yielding open-pollinated lines for breeding and farming purposes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bernardo, R. 2002. Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Stemma Press. Woodbury, MN, USA. pp. 1–369.
Constantinidou, K., Fasoulas, A.C. 1988. Evidence for the genetic basis of heterosis during hybrid reconstruction in maize. Proc. 2nd Congress of the Hellenic Soc. for the Genetic Improvement of Plants. Thessaloniki, Greece. pp. 215–225.
Crow, J.F. 2000. The rise and the fall of overdominance. Plant Breed. Rev. 17:225–257.
Duvick, D.N. 2005. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 50:193–202.
Falconer, D.S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 1st ed. Oliver and Boyd. London, UK. pp. 1–365.
Fasoula, V.A. 2006. A novel equation paves the way for an everlasting revolution with cultivars characterized by high and stable crop yield and quality. Proc. 11th Congress of the Hellenic Society for the Genetic Improvement of Plants. Orestiada, Greece. pp. 7–14.
Fasoula, V.A. 2013. Prognostic breeding: A new paradigm for crop improvement. Plant Breed. Rev. 37:297–347.
Fasoulas, A.C. 1988. The Honeycomb Methodology of Plant Breeding. A. Altidjis Publ. Thessaloniki, Greece. pp. 1–168.
Fasoulas, A.C. 1993. Principles of crop breeding. A.C. Fasoulas, P.O. Box 19555, Thessaloniki, Greece. pp. 1–128.
Fischer, R.A., Edmeades, G.O. 2010. Breeding and cereal yield progress. Crop Sci. 50:S85–S98.
Gogas, D.M. 1987. Controlled mass honeycomb selection for yield in segregating generations of single maize hybrid. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. Genetics and Plant Breeding. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Greece. pp. 1–141.
Greveniotis, V. 2012. Investigation of the possibilities to replace maize hybrids with open pollinated lines. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Agricultural Development, Democritus University of Thrace. Orestiada, Greece. pp. 1–193.
Greveniotis, V., Fasoula, V.A., Papadopoulos, I.I., Sinapidou, E., Tokatlidis, I.S. 2012. The development of highly-performing open-pollinated maize lines via single-plant selection in the absence of competition. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6:1448–1454.
Greveniotis, V., Fasoula, V.A. 2016. Application of prognostic breeding in maize. Crop Pasture Sci. 67:605–620.
Hallauer, A.R., Miranda, F.J.B. 1981. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 1st Ed. Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames, IA, USA. pp. 1–468.
Hefny, M. 2010. Genetic control of flowering traits, yield and its components in maize (Zea mays L.) at different sowing days. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2:236–249.
Ipsilandis, C.G., Koutsika-Sotiriou, M. 2000. The combining ability of recombinant S-lines developed from F2 maize population. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 134:191–198.
Ipsilandis C.G., Deligeorgidis, P.N., Giakalis, L., Koutsika, M., Papadopoulou, A., Xanthopoulos, V. 2005. Breeding for homozygotic superiority and stability in maize without loosing combining ability. Asian J. Plant Sci. 4:499–506.
Ipsilandis, C.G., Tokatlidis, I.S., Vafias, B., Stefanis, D. 2006. Criteria for developing second-cycle hybrid in maize. Asian J. Plant Sci. 5:680–685.
Kearsey, M.J., Pooni, H.S. 1992. The potential of inbred lines in the presence of heterosis. In: Dattee, Y., Dumas, C., Gallais, A. (eds), Reproductive Biology and Plant Breeding. Springer-Verlag. London, UK. pp. 371–386.
Kyriakou, D.T., Fasoulas, A.C. 1985. Effects of competition and selection pressure on yield response to winter rye (Secale cereale L.). Euphytica 34:883–895.
Moll, R.H., Bari, A., Stuber, C.W. 1977. Frequency distribution of maize yield before and after reciprocal recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 17:794–796.
Romagosa, I., Fox, P.N. 1993. Genotype × environment interaction and adaptation. In: Hayward, M.D., Bosemark, N.O., Romagosa, I. (eds). Plant Breeding Principles and Prospects. Chapman & Hall. New York, USA. pp. 373–390.
Troyer, A.F., Wellin, J.E. 2009. Heterosis decreasing in hybrids: yield test inbreds. Crop Sci. 49:1969–1976.
Acknowledgements
This research work was based on the remarks and support of professors A.C. Fasoulas, St. Zotis+ and C.K. Goulas. This research has been partly co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund - ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in Knowledge Society through the European Social Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Harangozó
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM)
Rights and permissions
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Greveniotis, V., Sioki, E. & Ipsilandis, C.G. Frequency Distribution Analysis of a Maize Population as a Tool in Maize Breeding. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 45, 687–698 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.45.2017.045
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.45.2017.045