Abstract
The aim of this paper is to redefine evolutionary economics in view of its negative and positive identities. The negative identity is formed as a counterargument to neoclassical economics with the hypotheses of optimizing agents and equilibrium, and this functions as a ‘vision’ that leads to the positive identity. According to the vision, the market is not a universally designed or constructed system, but an autopoietic system or a spontaneous order. In order to specify the positive identity, we examine the ontological/epistemological double meanings of evolutionary economics that entail a recursive relation between economy and economics. Evolutionary economics is redefined as the economics of a large-scale, complex and uncertain economy that exists as a loosely connected system with a micro-macro loop structure, facilitated by such social institutions as rules or conventions, multi-layered buffers and routines. It also means the ‘analogical-evolutionary pluralist’ approach within economics as well as meta-economics in terms of the relationship between economics and history of economics or other disciplines of science.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bouwel, J. V. (2005) “Towards a Framework for Pluralism in Economics,” Post-Autistic Economics Review 30 [http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue30/VanBouwel30.htm]
Caldwell, B. J. (1984) Beyond Positivism; Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, George Allen & Unwin, London and Boston.
Dopfer, K. (ed) (2001) Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dorfrecht/London.
- (2001) “Evolutionary Economics: Framework for Analysis,” in K. Dopfer (ed) Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/ Dorfrecht/London.
Downward, P. and A. Mearman (2005) “Reorienting Economics through Triangulation of Methods,” Post-Autistic Economics Review 31 [http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue31/DownwardMearman31.htm]
Hamilton, D. (1991[1953]) Evolutionary Economics: A Study of Change in Economic Thought, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London.
Herrmann-Pillath, C. (2001) “On the Ontological Foundation of Evolutionary Economics,” in K. Dopfer (ed) Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston/Dortrecht/London.
Hodgson, G. M. (2001) How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, Routledge, London and New York.
- (1993) Economics and Evolution: Bringing life back into Economics, Polity Press and University of Michigan Press, Cambridge and Ann Arbor.
Kaneko, M. and T. Kodama, (2004) Anti-System Science (in Japanese), Iwanami-shoten, Tokyo.
Kichiji, N. and M. Nishibe (2004) “The Model of Multi-layered Adjustment Firms in an Autonomous and Dispersive Market—Based on Multi-Agent Simulation” (in Japanese), in M. Nishibe (ed) The Frontier of Evolutionary Economics, Nihon Hyoron-sha, Tokyo.
King, J. E. (2004) “Three Arguments for Pluralism in Economics,” Post-Asutistic Economics Review 23 [http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue23/King23.htm]
Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality, Routledge, London and New York.
- (2003) Reorienting Economics, Routledge, London and New York.
Marshall, A. (1949) The Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Macmillann, London.
Nishibe, M. (2005) “The Present of Evolutionary Economics” (in Japanese), in M. Yoshida (ed) The Present of Economics II, Nihon Keizai Hyoronsya, Tokyo, pp. 1–96.
- (ed) (2004) The Frontier of Evolutionary Economics (in Japanese), Nihon Hyoron-sha, Tokyo.
- (1998) “A Theory of the Multi-layered and Dispersive Market—Irreversible Time, Decoupling Mechanisms, and Price-Quantity Adjustments” (in Japanese), The Bulletin of Evolutionary Economics, Japan Association for Evolutionary Economic s 2: 222–231.
- (1996) “A Multi-Layered Adjustment Mechanism of Market—Price-Quantity Adjustment of Temporary and Short run” (in Japanese), The Journal of Economic Studies, Hokkaido University 45. 4: 69–95.
Ridley, M. (2003) Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience, and What Makes Us Human, HarperCollins, New York.
Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954) History of Economic Analysis, Allen & Unwin, London.
Shiozawa, Y. (1990) The Science of the Market order: From Anti-equilibrium to Complex Systems (in Japanese), Chikuma Shobo, Tokyo.
- (2004) “Evolutionary Economic in the 21st Century: A Manifesto,” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review l. 1: 5–47.
Smith, A. (1981 [1776]) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Liberty Press, Indianapolis.
Veblen, T. (1898) “Why is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 12: 373–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Nishibe, M. Redefining Evolutionary Economics. Evolut Inst Econ Rev 3, 3–25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.3.3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14441/eier.3.3