Skip to main content
Log in

Assay interference leading to misdiagnosis of central precocious puberty

  • Case Study
  • Published:
Endocrine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immunoassays are widely used to determine hormone levels. Antibodies directed against components of the immunoassay system can interfere with analyte concentration estimates. When unrecognized by clinicians, inappropriate clinical intervention may follow. The case of a young child with premature thelarche and elevated basal and stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) levels is presented, in whom it is hypothesized that heterophile antibodies (HAs) caused interference in the LH immunoassay. LH concentrations were measured in two different assays: LH-microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) and LH-immunochemiluminometric assay (ICMA). To detect HA interference, LH level was remeasured after both preincubation with mouse serum to neutralize human anti-mouse antibodies, and treatment with a heterophile-blocking tube. The mean basal LH concentration by LH-MEIA was 7.4 mIU/mL and for LH-ICMA was 0.08 mIU/mL (normal range for age: 0.02–0.3 mIU/mL). LH concentration by MEIA was 0.08 mIU/mL after preincubation with mouse serum and 2.7 mIU/mL after preincubation with a heterophile blocking tube. In conclusion, HAs were identified in the serum of a child with premature thelarche. The presence of HAs led to spuriously elevated basal and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated LH concentrations, resulting in a diagnosis of central precocious puberty and unnecessary therapy. To avoid similar cases in the future, clinicians should consider the possibility of assay interference when the clinical picture is incongruent with the laboratory data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Witherspoon, L. R., Witkin, M., Shuler, S. E., Neely, H., and Gilbert S. (1986). South Med. J. 79(7), 836–839.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Padova, G., Briguglia, G., Tita, P., Munguira, M. E., Arpi, M. L., and Pezzino, V. (1991). Fertil. Steril. 55(3), 637–639.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sampson, M., Ruddel, M., Zweig, M., and Elin, R. J. (1994). Clin. Chem. 40(10), 1976,1977.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boscato, L. M. and Stuart, M. C. (1988). Clin. Chem. 34(1), 27–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boscato, L. M. and Stuart, M. C. (1986). Clin. Chem. 32(8), 1491–1495.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dericks-Tan, J. S., Jost, A., Schwedes, U., and Taubert, H. D. (1984). Klin. Wochenschr. 62(6), 265–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gendrel, D., Feinstein, M. C., Grenier, J., et al. (1981). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 52(1), 62–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Czernichow, P., Vandalem, J. L., and Hennen, G. (1981). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 53(2), 387–393.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guilbert, B., Dighiero, G., and Avrameas, S. (1982). J. Immunol. 128(6), 2779–2787.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levinson, S. S. (1992). Clin. Biochem. 52(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan, I. V. and Levinson, S. S. (1999). Clin. Chem. 45(5), 616–618.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rubin, R. L. and Theofilopoulos, A. N. (1988). Int. Rev. Immunol. 3(1–2), 71–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouvet, J. P. and Dighiero, G. (1998). Infect. Immun. 66(1), 1–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benoist, J. F., Orbach, D., and Biou, D. (1998). Clin. Chem. 44(9), 1980–1985.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vladutiu, A. O., Sulewski, J. M., Pudlak, K. A., and Stull, C. G. (1982). JAMA 248(19), 2489,2490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hedenborg, G., Pettersson, T., and Carlstrom, A. (1979). Lancet 2(8145), 755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, R. J., Jackson, A. P., and Langlois, N. (1986). Clin. Chem. 32(3), 476–481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, P. M., Price, C. P., and Ellis, D. H. (1987). Clin. Chem. 33(3), 414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda A. DiMeglio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segal, D.G., DiMeglio, L.A., Ryder, K.W. et al. Assay interference leading to misdiagnosis of central precocious puberty. Endocr 20, 195–199 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:20:3:195

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ENDO:20:3:195

Key Words

Navigation