Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation Conditions for SFC of Metoprolol and Related Amino Alcohols on Hypercarb (Porous Graphitic Carbon) with Respect to Structure–Selectivity Relations

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile phase chromatographic conditions for the selective separation of metoprolol from related amino alcohols have been evaluated using Hypercarb as support and carbon dioxide with addition of methanol as mobile phase. The objective for the presented study was to show the unique ability of the porous graphitized carbon surface to separate closely structurally related substances. Experimental results, using Hypercarb and “chromatographic normal phase conditions” (SFC), are presented with focus on how to control retention and to improve peak performance. A high concentration of basic aliphatic amine additive was required in order to elute the amine analytes as symmetrical peaks. N,N-Dimethyloctylamine was preferred over triethylamine since the retention was markedly shorter though the selectivity and resolution were virtually the same. The selectivity can be optimized by altering the temperature of the column. A high selectivity was demonstrated between metoprolol and two homologues with one and two extra methylene groups inserted between the secondary nitrogen atom and the carbon atom with a hydroxyl group attached. The mobile phase flow rate effect the column efficiency only to a minor extent as the steepness of the van Deemter curve for metoprolol was virtually flat in the range studied: 0.5–3.0 mL min−1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knox JH, Ross P (1997) Carbon-based packing materials for liquid chromatography. Structure, performance and retention mechanisms. In: Brown PR, Grushka E (eds) Advances in chromatography, vol 37. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 73–119

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbert MT, Knox JH, Kaur B (1982) Chromatographia 16:138–146. doi:10.1007/BF02258884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Karlsson A, Karlsson O (2001) J Chromatogr A 905(1–2):329–335. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00986-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacquet R, Pennanec R, Elfakir C, Lafosse M (2004) J Sep Sci 27:1221–1228. doi:10.1002/jssc.200401758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hazotte A, Libong D, Chaminade P (2007) J Chromatogr A 1140(1–2):131–139. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira L (2008) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 31:1687–1731. doi:10.1080/10826070802126429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanai T (2003) J Chromatogr 989:183–196. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(02)02017-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thiebaut D, Vial J, Martin M, Hennion M-C, Greibrokk T (2006) J Chromatogr 1122:97–104. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.04.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gyllenhaal O, Karlsson A (2000) J Biochem Biophys Methods 43(1–3):373–384. doi:10.1016/S0165-022X(00)00087-7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gyllenhaal O, Karlsson A (2000) Chromatographia 52:351–355. doi:10.1007/BF02491030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. West C, Lesellier E, Tchapla A (2004) J Chromatogr 1048:99–109. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.07.010

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. West C, Lesellier E (2005) J Chromatogr 1099:175–184. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2005.09.002:

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bailey CJ, Ruane RJ, Wilson ID (1994) J Chromatogr Sci 32:426–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gyllenhaal O, Vessman J (1999) J Chromatogr 839:141–148. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00052-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Svensson S, Karlsson A, Gyllenhaal O, Vessman J (2000) Chromatographia 51:283–293. doi:10.1007/BF02490605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lundgren J, Salomonsson J, Gyllenhaal O, Johansson E (2007) J Chromatogr 1154:360–367. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.02.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gyllenhaal O, Karlsson A, Vessman J (1997) In: Anton K, Berger C (eds) Supercritical fluid chromatography with packed columns. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 273–300

  18. Gyllenhaal O, Karlsson A (2002) J Biochem Biophys Methods 54:169–185. doi:10.1016/S0165-022X(02)00139-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gyllenhaal O, Edström L, Persson B-A (2006) J Chromatogr 1134:305–310. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsson A, Charron C (1996) J Chromatogr 732:245–253. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(95)01291-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karlsson A, Almgren K (2007) Chromatographia 66:349–356. doi:10.1365/s10337-007-0352-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer H, Gyllenhaal O, Vessman J, Albert K (2003) Anal Chem 75:622–626. doi:10.1021/ac020527p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hampe EM, Rudkevich DM (2003) Tetrahedron 59:9619–9625. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2003.09.096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dijkstra ZJ, Doornbos AR, Weyten H, Ernsting JM, Elsevier CJ, Keurentjes JTF (2007) J Supercrit Fluids 41:109–114. doi:10.1016/j.supflu.2006.08.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Berger TA, Wilson WH (1994) J Pharm Sci 83:281–286. doi:10.1002/jps.2600830304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Berger TA, Wilson WH (1994) J Pharm Sci 83:287–290. doi:10.1002/jps.2600830305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Gyllenhaal O, Karlsson A, Vessman J (1999) J Chromatogr 862:95–104. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(99)00921-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gyllenhaal O (2004) J Chromatogr 1042:173–180. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Karlsson A, Berglin M, Charron C (1998) J Chromatogr 797:75–82. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(97)01260-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Erickson M, Karlsson K-E, Lamm B, Larsson S, Svensson LA, Vessman J (1995) J Pharm Biomed Anal 13:567–574. doi:10.1016/0731-7085(95)01277-R

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olle Gyllenhaal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gyllenhaal, O., Karlsson, A. Evaluation Conditions for SFC of Metoprolol and Related Amino Alcohols on Hypercarb (Porous Graphitic Carbon) with Respect to Structure–Selectivity Relations. Chroma 71, 7–13 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1406-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1406-3

Keywords

Navigation