Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of the Active Components in Chinese Herb Cortex Moutan by MEKC and LC

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 10 July 2011

Abstract

Cortex Moutan is one important traditional Chinese herb used in many traditional prescriptions. Paeonol (PN) and paeoniflorin (PF) are two active components contained in Cortex Moutan. In the present work, micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography (MEKC) was applied to the determination of these active components in Cortex Moutan, and the analytical results were compared with that obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The optimized buffer system containing 10 mM borate and 25 mM SDS at pH 9.5 was employed in MEKC analysis and the linearities between peak areas and the concentrations of the analytes were investigated. The excellent linear behavior was exhibited over the investigated concentration ranges (R2: 0.9945 for PN and 0.9992 for PF in MEKC, while 0.9993 for PN and 0.9998 for PF in HPLC). The recoveries of the developed MEKC method ranged 97.1–104.4% for PN and 95.3–103.2% for PF, respectively. It was shown that no significant difference was found in the analysis of Cortex Moutan by the developed MEKC and HPLC methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Y. Cheng.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2107-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, K., Wang, Y.W. & Cheng, Y. . Determination of the Active Components in Chinese Herb Cortex Moutan by MEKC and LC. Chroma 63, 359–364 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-006-0760-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-006-0760-7

Keywords

Navigation