Abstract
The retention time of 10 ring-substituted aniline derivatives was determined on six different reversed-phase stationary phases and the retention parameters log k, theoretical plate number (N) and asymmetry factor (F) were calculated for each analyte on each column. The similarities and differences among the stationary phase and analytes were assessed by principal component analysis coupled with nonlinear mapping and cluster analysis. Computations demonstrated that the retention characteristics of both the stationary phases and analytes markedly deviate from each other. Calculations indicated that the results considerably depend on the multivariate method applied, therefore, the employment of more than than one computation method and the critical comparison of the results is highly advocated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li Y, Wang F, Zhou G, Ni Y (2003) Chemosphere 53:1229–1234
Gürten AA, Ucan S, Ozler MA, Ayar A (2005) J Hazard Mat 120:81–87
Duman O, Ayranc E (2005) J Hazard Mat 120:173–181
Weisz A, Andrzejewski B (2003) J Chromatogr A 1005:143–153
Zhang L, You J, Ping G, Zhang L, Ni Y (2003) Anal Chim Acta 141–147
Zakaria P, Macka M, Haddad PR (2003) J Chromatogr A 997:207–218
Luong JHT, Bouvrette P, Liu Y, Yang D-Q, Sacher E (2005) J Chromatogr A 1074:187–194
Peng J-F, Liu J-F, Jiang, G-B, Huang M-J (2005) J Chromatogr A 1072:3–6
Berrada H, Font G, Moltó JC (2004) J Chromatogr A 1042:9–14
Kaliszan R (1997) Structure and Retention in Chromatography. A Chemometric Approach, Harwood Academic Publishers, Austra-lia
Skrbic B, Djurisic-Mladenovic N, Cvejanov J (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:167–171
Farkas O, Héberger K, Zenkevich IG (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:173–184
Holik M, Mannschreck A (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:153–160
Felinger A, Káré M (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:225–232
Vandeginste BGM, Massart DL, Buydens LMC, De Jong S, Lewi PJ, Smeyers-Verbeke J (1998) Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part B Data Handling in Science and Technology. Vol. 20B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 87–161
Wasim M, Brereton RG (2004) Chemom Intell Lab Syst 72:133–151
Fragkaki AG, Koupparis MA, Georgakopoulos CG Anal Chim Acta 512:165–171
Sarbu C, Casoni D, Darabantu M, Maiereanu C (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 35:213–219
Sammon JW Jr (1969) IEEE Trans Comput C18 401–407
Forgács E, Kósa A, Csiktusnádi Kiss G, Kaliszan R, Haber P, Nasal A (1998) J Liq Chrom & Relat Technol 21:2523–2534
Kánya Z, Cserháti T, Forgács E (2003) Chromatographia 57:451–456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kánya, Z., Forgács, E., Cserháti, T. et al. Reducing Dimensionality in Principal Component Analysis – A Method Comparison. Chroma 63, 129–134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-005-0687-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-005-0687-4