Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Principal Components Analysis, Independent Components Analysis and Common Components Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Analysis and Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this work is to describe and compare three exploratory chemometrical tools, principal components analysis, independent components analysis and common components analysis, the last one being a modification of the multi-block statistical method known as common components and specific weights analysis. The three methods were applied to a set of data to show the differences and similarities of the results obtained, highlighting their complementarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 1987;2:37–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rutledge DN, Bouveresse JRD. Independent components analysis with the JADE algorithm. Trac-Trends Anal Chem. 2013;50:22–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rutledge DN, Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D. Corrigendum to “Independent components analysis with the JADE algorithm”. Trac-Trends Anal Chem. 2015;67:220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang GQ, Ding QZ, Hou ZY. Independent component analysis and its applications in signal processing for analytical chemistry. Trac- Trends Anal Chem. 2008;27:368–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouhlel J, Bouveresse DJR, Abouelkaram S, Baéza E, Jondreville C, Travel A, Ratel J, Engel E, Rutledge DN. Comparison of common components analysis with principal components analysis and independent components analysis: application to SPME-GC-MS volatolomic signatures. Talanta. 2018;178:854–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cardoso J-F, Souloumiac A. Blind beamforming for non-Gaussian signals. IEE ProcF. 1993;140(6):362–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D, Rutledge DN. Independent components analysis: theory and applications. In: Ruckebusch C, editor. Resolving spectral mixtures. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017. p. 225–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qannari E, Wakeling I, Courcoux P, MacFie HJH. Defining the underlying sensory dimensions. Food Qual Prefer. 2000;11:151–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cariou V, Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D, Qannari EM, Rutledge DN. ComDim methods for the analysis of multiblock data in a data fusion perspective. In: Cocchi M, editor. Data fusion methodology and applications (Data Handling in Science and Technology). Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mazerolles G, Devaux MF, Dufour E, Qannari EM, Courcoux P. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2002;63:57–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackman J, Rutledge DN, Tesic D, Saliba A, Scollary GR. Anal Chim Acta. 2010;660:2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin JC, Maillot M, Mazerolles G, Verdu A, Lyan B, Migne C, Defoort C, Canlet C, Junot C, Guillou C, Manach C, Jabob D, Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D, Paris E, Pujos-Guillot E, Jourdan F, Giacomoni F, Courant F, Fave G, Le Gall G, Chassaigne H, Tabet JC, Martin JF, Antignac JP, Shintu L, Defernez M, Philo M, Alexandre-Gouaubau MC, Amiot-Carlin MJ, Bossis M, Triba MN, Stojilkovic N, Banzet N, Molinie R, Bott R, Goulitquer S, Caldarelli S, Rutledge DN. Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Metabolomics. 2015;11:807–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubin E, Spiteri M, Dumas AS, Ginet J, Lees M, Rutledge DN. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2016;150:41–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rutledge DN. Characterisation of water in agro-food products by time domain-NMR. Food Control. 2001;12:437–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D, Moya-González A, Ammari F, Rutledge DN. Two novel methods for the determination of the number of components in independent components analysis models. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 2012;112:24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kassouf A, Jouan-Rimbaud Bouveresse D, Rutledge DN. Determination of the optimal number of components in independent components analysis. Talanta. 2018;179:538–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA, UMR GENIAL, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, Massy, France

    Douglas N. Rutledge

Authors
  1. Douglas N. Rutledge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas N. Rutledge.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rutledge, D.N. Comparison of Principal Components Analysis, Independent Components Analysis and Common Components Analysis. J. Anal. Test. 2, 235–248 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41664-018-0065-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41664-018-0065-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation