Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of discontinuous yielding on normal anisotropy (R-value) measurements

  • Materials Testing
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate assessment of plastic anisotropy is essential to many material models used in computer-aided sheet metal forming simulations. In this analysis, the influence of discontinuous yielding (yield point elongation or YPE) on normal anisotropy (R-value) measurements was examined. A laboratory-annealed, non temper-rolled, aluminum-killed drawing quality (AKDQ) steel was considered. It was found that discontinuous yielding significantly influences R-value calculations by imposing an effective offset to the width strain measurement during a sheet tensile test if the R-value is defined in terms of total strains (RWT). The effect may be positive or negative and shows considerable variability between tests. For a more accurate and consistent representation of normal anisotropy, the incremental R-value (R’=dɛW/dɛT) should be used in cases of significant YPE. A procedure has been developed to account for the low-strain effects of discontinuous yielding on plastic anisotropy measurements, where the R’-value is determined in a region of stable, uniform deformation on the stress/strain curve. For adequately temper rolled materials (with minimal YPE) and for inherently YPE-free materials, the R-value may be determined in the conventional way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.L. Whitely, The Importance of Directionality in Drawing Quality Sheet Steel, Trans. Am. Soc. Met., Vol 52, 1960, p 154–169

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Hill, A Theory of the Yielding and Plastic Flow of Anisotropic Metals, Proc. R. Soc. London, Vol A193, 1948, p 281–297

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Barlat, Y. Maeda, K. Chung, M. Yanagawa, J.C. Brem, Y. Hayashida, D.J. Lege, K. Matsui, S.J. Murtha, S. Hattori, R.C. Becker, and S. Makosey, Yield Function Development for Aluminum Alloy Sheets, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol 45, 1997, p 1727–1763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P.D. Wu, M. Jain, J. Savoie, S.R. MacEwan, P. Tugcu, and K.W. Neale, Evaluation of Anisotropic Yield Functions for Aluminum Sheets, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol 19, 2003, p 121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G.E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.F. Hosford and R.M. Caddell, Metal Forming—Mechanics and Metallurgy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kalpakjian, Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, 1992

  8. S.L. Semiatin and J.J. Jonas, Formability & Workability of Metals—Plastic Instability & Flow Localization, ASM, 1984

  9. M-G. Lee, D. Kim, C. Kim, M.L. Wenner, R.H. Wagoner, and K. Chung, Spring-Back Evaluation of Automotive Sheets Based on Isotropic-Kinematic Hardening Laws and Non-Quadratic Anisotropic Yield Functions, Part II: Characterization of Material Properties, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol 21, 2005, p 883–914

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. “Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio r for Sheet Metal,” E 517 – 98, ASTM, 1998

  11. P.R. Mould and T.E. Johnson, Rapid Assessment of Drawability of Cold-Rolled Low-C Steel Sheets, Sheet Metal Ind., Vol 50 (No. 6), 1973, p 328–330, 332, 348

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.T. Van Rooyen, The Stress and Strain Distribution in a Propagating Lüders Front Accompanying the Yield-point Phenomenon in Iron, Mat. Sci. Eng., Vol 3, 1969, p 105–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hance, B.M. Influence of discontinuous yielding on normal anisotropy (R-value) measurements. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 14, 616–622 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994905X64576

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994905X64576

Keywords

Navigation