Skip to main content
Log in

thtAn ideal interval method of multi-objective decision-making for comprehensive assessment of water resources renewability

  • Published:
Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to estimate water resources renewability scientifically, an Ideal Interval Method of Multiple Objective Decision-Making (IIMMODM) is presented. This method is developed through improving an ideal point method of multiple objective decision-making. The ideal interval is obtained with assessment standard instead of ideal points. The weights are decided by using the basic point and gray code accelerating genetic algorithm. This method has synthesized the expert’s suggestion and avoided giving a mark for the objective again. It could solve the complicated problem of compatible or incompatible multi-objective assessment. The principle of IIMMODM is presented in this paper. It is used to assess the water resources renewability for nine administrative divisions in the Yellow River basin. The result shows that the water resources renewability in the Yellow River basin is very low. Compared with the gray associate analysis method, fuzzy synthesis method and genetic projection pursuit method, the IIMMODM is easier to use. Compared with the ideal point method of multiple objective decision-making, the IIMMODM has good robustness, which is applicable to the comprehensive assessments of water resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xia, J., Wang, Z. G., Liu, C. M., The renewability of water resources and its quantification in the Yellow Riverbasin in china, Acta Geographica Sinica (in Chinese), 2003, 58(4): 534–541.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zeng, W. H., Yang, Z. F., Principium of the renewability of water resources, Advances in Water Science (in Chinese) 2001, 12(2): 276–279.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen, Z. Y., Yang, Z. F., Liu, C. M., Water Resource Renewability and its Relationship with Refresh Rate, Journal of Geographical Sciences (in Chinese), 2002, 22(2): 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang, C. L., Lin, M. J., Group Decision-Making under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications, Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987: 23–41.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Saaty, T. L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1997, 17(15): 234–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chu, A. T. W., Kalaba, R. E., Spingam, K. A., Comparison of two methods for determining the weights of being to fuzzy sets, Journal of Optimization Theory and Application, 1979, 27: 531–538.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, L. F., The Introduction of Analytical Hieraichy Process (in Chinese), Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 1990, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, Y. D., Hu, M. D., Improved analysis of hierarchy process and its application to multiobjective decision, Xitong Gongcheng Lilun Yu Shijian (in Chinese), 1997, 17(6): 40–57.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Deng, J. L., Theory of Gray System (in Chinese), Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, Z. Y., Yang, Z. F., Index system and method for assessing water resource renewability, Journal of Natural Resources (in Chinese), 2002, 17(2): 188–197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Han, Z. Z., Zhou, S. R., Wu, Q. D., et al, Study on fuzzy statistic and comprehensive assessment for active region, Science in China, Ser. A (in Chinese), 2001, 31(3): 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, X. P., Ma, N. H., Research on PCA and its application in multi-criteria evaluation, Xitong Gongcheng Lihin Yu Shijian (in Chinese), 1997, 17(4): 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xue, J. J., Yao, G. J., Application of artificial neural network in assessing water quality, Shui Wen (in Chinese) 1997, 17(3): 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, Z. Y., Projection pursuit technique and its application and advance, Journal for Nature (in Chinese), 1997, 19(4): 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, X. L., Ding, J., Li, Z. Y., et al., Application of new projection pursuit algorithm in assessing water quality, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae (in Chinese), 2000, 20(2): 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jin, J. L., Wei, Y. M., Ding, J., Projection pursuit model for comprehensive evaluation of water quality, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae (in Chinese), 2001, 21(4): 431–434.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, W. K., Wu, Z. Y., Ju, T. Y., A synthesized method for group’s multiple objective decision-making, Journal of Southweat Jiaotong University (in Chinese), 2001, 36(1): 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qian, S. D., Gan, Y. G., Tian, F. et al., Operational Research (in Chinese), Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2002, 451–452.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, W., Li, F. X., Mei, P., A multi-objective decision-ideal point method for comprehensive assessment of water quality, Environmental Engineering (in Chinese), 2002, 20(3): 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, X. H., Yang, Z. F., Li, J. Q., Genetic projection pursuit method for comprehensive assessment of regional water resource potentiality, Advance in Nature Science (in Chinese), 2003, 13(5): 554.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Yang, Z., Shen, Z. et al. thtAn ideal interval method of multi-objective decision-making for comprehensive assessment of water resources renewability. Sci. China Ser. E-Technol. Sci. 47 (Suppl 1), 42–50 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1360/04ez0004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/04ez0004

Keywords

Navigation