Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in estimates of cisplatin-induced cell kill in vitro between colorimetric and cell count/colony assays

  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate some bioassays that are different in principle: cell counting, colony forming assay, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), sulforhodamine B (SRB), crystal violet, and alamarBlue, with respect to their ability to measure cisplatin-induced cell death of in vitro-cultivated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cisplatin was applied in concentrations of 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 50.0, and 100 μM. The cells were incubated for 1 h, and the cell survival was measured 5 d after treatment. We found the colorimetric assays and cell counting to be comparable. The colony forming assay indicated a higher degree of cell kill compared with the other techniques. Measurement of cell survival after treatment with cisplatin can be done by use of any of the above tested assays. However, the majority of SCCHN cell lines available do not form colonies easily, or at all. Therefore, comparing the chemosensitivity between such cell lines is limited to alternative assays. In this respect, any of the tested colorimetric assays can be used. However, they seem to underestimate cell kill. Cell counting is also an alternative. This technique, however, is time consuming and operator dependent, as in the case of manual counting, or relatively expensive when counting is performed electronically, compared with the colorimetric assays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S. A.; Gogal, R. M. Jr.; Walsh, J. E. A new rapid and simple nonradioactive assay to monitor and determine the proliferation of lymphocytes: an alternative to [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J. Immunol. Methods 170:211–224; 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banasiak, D.; Barnetson, A. R.; Odell, R. A., et al. Comparison between the clonogenic, MTT, and SRB assays for determining radiosensitivity in a panel of human bladder cancer cell lines and a ureteral cell line. Radiat. Oncol. Investig. 7:77–85; 1999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, J.; DeGraff, W. G.; Gazdar, A. F., et al. Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of radiosensitivity. Cancer Res. 47:943–946; 1987.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. S.; Pajak, T. F.; Forastiere, A. A., et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N. Engl. J. Med. 350:1937–1944;2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grenman, R.; Carey, T. E.; McClatchey, K. D., et al. In vitro radiation resistance among cell lines established from patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 67:2741–2747; 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, R.; Rotshteyn, Y.; Rabadi, L., et al. Comparison of alamar blue and MTT assays for high through-put screening. Toxicol. In Vitro 18:703–710; 2004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, E.; Baldetorp, B.; Borg, A., et al. p53 mutation and cyclin D1 amplification correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in xenografted human squamous cell carcinomas from head and neck. Acta Oncol. 45:300–305; 2006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holst, C. M.; Oredsson, S. Comparison of three cytotoxicity tests in the evaluation of the cytotoxicity of a spermine analogue on human breast cancer cell lines. Toxicol. In Vitro 19:379–387; 2005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawada, K.; Yonei, T.; Ueoka, H., et al. Comparison of chemosensitivity tests: clonogenic assay versus MTT assay. Acta Med. Okayama 56:129–134; 2002.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keepers, Y. P.; Pizao, P. E.; Peters, G. J., et al. Comparison of the sulforhodamine B protein and tetrazolium (MTT) assays for in vitro chemosensitivity testing. Eur. J. Cancer 27:897–900; 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, B.; Korst, A. E.; de Pooter, C. M., et al. Comparison of the sulforhodamine B assay and the clonogenic assay for in vitro chemoradiation studies. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 51:221–226; 2003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, R. P.; Godwin, A. K.; Handel, L. M., et al. A comparison of clonogenic, microtetrazolium and sulforhodamine B assays for determination of cisplatin cytotoxicity in human ovarian carcinoma cell lines Eur. J. Cancer 29A:395–399; 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pignon, J. P.; Burhis, J.; Domenge, C.,. et al. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer. Lancet 355:949–955; 2000.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, P.; Storeng, R.; Scudiero, D., et al. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 82:1107–1112; 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henriksson, E., Kjellén, E., Wahlberg, P. et al. Differences in estimates of cisplatin-induced cell kill in vitro between colorimetric and cell count/colony assays. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Animal 42, 320–323 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1290/0604022.1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1290/0604022.1

Key words

Navigation