Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified Radical Mastectomy in De Novo Stage IV Inflammatory Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are few studies on surgical management in patients with de novo metastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The objective of this study is to examine the association between modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with de novo stage IV IBC.

Patients and Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program was queried for patients ≥18 years old with cT4d/pT4d pathology, histology type 8530 and 8533 with distant disease between 2010 and 2016. The sample was divided into two groups: (1) the MRM group, defined as MRM or mastectomy with at least ten lymph nodes removed, and (2) the no-surgery group. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared between the groups on bivariable analysis. After propensity score matching, Kaplan–Meier curves and a Cox proportional-hazards model examined DSS.

Results

1293 patients were included in the study, of whom 240 underwent MRM. A higher percentage in the MRM group had only one metastatic site (69.8% versus 52.2%), received chemotherapy (88.3% versus 66.1%) and radiation (58.8% versus 26.0%) compared with the no-MRM group. MRM was associated with an increase in DSS compared with no MRM [HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.50–0.80), p < 0.001]. Patients with MRM had a 5-year DSS rate of 31.4% compared with 17.7% for patients not undergoing surgery (p = 0.001). Survival time was 38 months (range 27–45 months) for the MRM group versus 27 months (22–29 months) for the no-MRM group.

Conclusion

MRM in patients with de novo metastatic IBC may improve DSS in a subset of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hance KW, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Young HA, Levine PH. Trends in inflammatory breast carcinoma incidence and survival: the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program at the National Cancer Institute. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(13):966–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koch RM, Principe DR, Cataneo JL, Rana A. Progress for immunotherapy in inflammatory breast cancer and emerging barriers to therapeutic efficacy. Cancers (Basel). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Brzezinska M, Dixon JM. Inflammatory breast cancer: no longer an absolute contraindication for breast conservation surgery following good response to neoadjuvant therapy. Gland Surg. 2018;7(6):520–4. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.08.04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Walshe JM, Swain SM. Clinical aspects of inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2005;22:35–44. https://doi.org/10.3233/bd-2006-22105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rueth NM, Lin HY, Bedrosian I, et al. Underuse of trimodality treatment affects survival for patients with inflammatory breast cancer: an analysis of treatment and survival trends from the National Cancer Database. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(19):2018–24. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2014.55.1978.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Guidelines NCCNNCPGiON. Breast Cancer. Version 5. 2021.

  7. Adesoye T, Lucci A. Current surgical management of inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(10):5461–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10522-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery. 2002;132(4):620–6 (discussion 626-7).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage iv breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Badwe R, Hawaldar R, Nair N, et al. Locoregional treatment versus no treatment of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1380–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00135-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soran A, Ozmen V, Ozbas S, et al. Randomized trial comparing resection of primary tumor with no surgery in stage iv breast cancer at presentation: protocol MF07-01. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(11):3141–9. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6494-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Cancer Institute D, Surveillance Research Program. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 18 Regs (Excl AK) Custom Data (with additional treatment fields), Nov 2018 Sub (2000–2016) <Vintage 2016 Pops by Tract 2000/2010 Mixed Geographies> - Linked To Census Tract Attributes—Time Dependent (2000-2016)—SEER 18 (excl AK) Census 2000/2010 Geographies with Index Field Quantiles. January 2020.

  13. Goldner B, Behrendt CE, Schoellhammer HF, Lee B, Chen SL. Incidence of inflammatory breast cancer in women, 1992–2009, United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(4):1267–70. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3439-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Axelsson CK, Mouridsen HT, Zedeler K. Axillary dissection of level I and II lymph nodes is important in breast cancer classification. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28a(8–9):1415–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu M, Tatalovich Z, Gibson JT, Cronin KA. Using a composite index of socioeconomic status to investigate health disparities while protecting the confidentiality of cancer registry data. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25(1):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0310-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12(8):703–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011240019516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L. Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9(4):369–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008811432436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 8.3.9. NCISSswscgsv. Surveillance Research Program.

  19. Pan X, Yang W, Chen Y, Tong L, Li C, Li H. Nomogram for predicting the overall survival of patients with inflammatory breast cancer: a SEER-based study. Breast. 2019;47:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2019.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrelli F, Barni S. Surgery of primary tumors in stage IV breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of published studies with meta-regression. Med Oncol. 2012;29(5):3282–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-012-0310-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Akay CL, Ueno NT, Chisholm GB, et al. Primary tumor resection as a component of multimodality treatment may improve local control and survival in patients with stage IV inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer. 2014;120(9):1319–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Uden DJP, van Maaren MC, Strobbe LJA, et al. Better survival after surgery of the primary tumor in stage IV inflammatory breast cancer. Surg Oncol. 2020;33:43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2020.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Partain N, Postlewait LM, Teshome M, et al. The role of mastectomy in de novo stage IV inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(8):4265–74. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-09392-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan Y, Tang L, Tong W, Zhou J. The role and indications of aggressive locoregional therapy in metastatic inflammatory breast cancer. Sci Rep. 05 13 2016;6:25874. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25874

  25. Weiss A, Menen RS, Lin HY, et al. Factors associated with improved outcomes for metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;169(3):615–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4715-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhattacharyya O, Li Y, Fisher JL, et al. Low neighborhood socioeconomic status is associated with higher mortality and increased surgery utilization among metastatic breast cancer patients. Breast. 2021;59:314–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Rahman O. Impact of NCI socioeconomic index on the outcomes of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients: analysis of SEER census tract-level socioeconomic database. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(6):e717–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dai D. Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit. Health Place. 2010;16(5):1038–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.06.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ekenga CC, Yeung CY, Oka M. Cancer risk from air toxics in relation to neighborhood isolation and sociodemographic characteristics: a spatial analysis of the St. Louis metropolitan area, USA. Environ Res. 2019;179(Pt B):108844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108844.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Poulson MR, Beaulieu-Jones BR, Kenzik KM, et al. Residential racial segregation and disparities in breast cancer presentation, treatment, and survival. Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krieger N, Jahn JL, Waterman PD. Jim Crow and estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer: US-born black and white non-Hispanic women, 1992–2012. Cancer Causes Control. 2017;28(1):49–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0834-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bharmal N, Derose KP, Felician MF, Weden MM. understanding the upstream social determinants of health. RAND Corporation; 2015.

  33. Iwase T, Shrimanker TV, Rodriguez-Bautista R, et al. Changes in overall survival over time for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim KN, Qureshi MM, Huang D, et al. The impact of locoregional treatment on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a national cancer database analysis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;20(2):e200–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gera R, Chehade HELH, Wazir U, Tayeh S, Kasem A, Mokbel K. Locoregional therapy of the primary tumour in de novo stage IV breast cancer in 216 066 patients: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):2952. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59908-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Reinhorn D, Mutai R, Yerushalmi R, Moore A, Amir E, Goldvaser H. Locoregional therapy in de novo metastatic breast cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis. Breast. 2021;58:173–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Institute NC, Studies DoCCaP. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) surveillance research program (SRP) metrics, 2018. Accessed 9/8, 2021. https://seer.cancer.gov/about/factsheets/metrics.pdf

  38. LeVasseur N, Sun J, Gondara L, et al. Impact of pathologic complete response on survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: a population-based analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020;146(2):529–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-03083-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Samilia Obeng-Gyasi is funded by the Paul Calabresi Career Development Award (K12 CA133250).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samilia Obeng-Gyasi MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J.C., Li, Y., Fisher, J.L. et al. Modified Radical Mastectomy in De Novo Stage IV Inflammatory Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 6681–6688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11975-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11975-6

Navigation