Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The study published in this issue of ASO by Hanna et al.1 reiterates a well-known dilemma in the peri- and postoperative management of patients with esophagogastric surgery.2,3 In fact, only a few other conditions may entail this prolonged risk of 2.5%.1 The literature has suggested that the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) (1.9%) may last for up to 2 years after complex gastrointestinal surgery.3 VTE can develop in single or recurrent episodes even after the traditional 90-day postsurgical period, thus mandating attention toward prolonged anticoagulation. Moreover, up to one third of the patients subjected to esophagogastric surgery may develop VTE after discharge. The message of this study is clear: prevention of VTE after esophagogastric surgery never ends. However, Nader and colleagues have uniquely searched for predisposing factors over a prolonged period of 6 months before and after the operation.
The authors of this interesting study also found that, while neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with VTE before surgery, extended hospital stay predicted VTE onset after surgery, being VTE itself is a cause of prolonged length of stay. Above all, Hanna et al.1 warn against the danger of ignoring the potential adverse effect of VTE on OS and CSS, which are severely reduced in affected patients (up to 50% with HR = 1.36 and 1.42, respectively).
Although the above results are not an absolute novelty, a few points need to be emphasized that add value to the literature. Almost 5,000 patients have been analyzed with an attempt at addressing a homogeneous cohort undergoing similar perioperative management from a regional database to capture demographic and clinical data. In this setting, the socioeconomic status of the study population has been added as an important covariate in the multifactorial analysis of perioperative VTE. The length of the study period is another strong point of this study, because 6-month intervals before and after surgery have been considered in the analysis. Moreover, patients with one or more episodes of VTE were included in the study to emphasize the need for prolonged surveillance and preventative measures. The relevance of the study by Nader et al. also is expressed by the fact that almost 60% of the patients in this cohort did not have major comorbidities when they underwent surgery; yet the reported incidence of VTE was 9% after esophageal and 7.5% after gastric surgery. The 30-day postoperative VTE incidence was 4.5% and 2.3%, after esophagectomy and gastrectomy, respectively, which compares favorably with the NESQIP data reported by De Martino et al. (7.3% and 2.7%, respectively) and from a recent review by Theochari et al. (4% after esophagectomy).4,5
Agzarian et al.6 showed that while 34% of surgeons estimated that more than 20% of VTE occurred post hospital discharge, only 13% routinely utilized extended thromboprophylaxis. The study by Nader et al. reiterates the importance of consensus based on evidence-based data.
The dilemma remains as to which factors can be modified to change the incidence of VTE after complex gastroesophageal surgery. As an example, the implementation of neoadjuvant treatment has been counteracted by the widespread adoption of enhanced recovery pathways, minimizing fluid overload, and early ambulation, which shorten postoperative hospital stay. This information is not included in the paper by Nader et al.
Final details that could be further investigated are the types of recommended anticoagulation as well as the implementation of scoring systems based on patient characteristics and biomarkers to predict risk.5,7
In conclusion, a prolonged anticoagulation prophylaxis seems to be an effective preventative measure against perioperative VTE after esophagogastric surgery. Still to be clarified will be the type of anticoagulation, whether mechanical preventative measures should be included, and most of all, how long this prophylaxis should last since the prevention of VTE after complex esophagogastric surgery appears to remain a never-ending story.6,8
References
Hanna NM, Williams E, Kong W, Fundytus A, Booth CM, Patel SV, et al. Incidence, timing and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11520-5.
Mantziari S, Gronnier C, Pasquer A, Gagnière J, Théreaux J, Demartines N, Schäfer M, Mariette C, FREGAT Working Group–FRENCH–AFC. Incidence and risk factors related to symptomatic venous thromboembolic events after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(3):979–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.093.
Paro A, Dalmacy D, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras DI, Diaz A, Pawlik TM. Impact of perioperative thromboembolic complications on future long-term risk of venous thromboembolism among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing complex gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(12):3064–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05080-4.
De Martino RR, Beck AW, Edwards MS, Corriere MA, Wallaert JB, Stone DH, et al. Impact of screening versus symptomatic measurement of deep vein thrombosis in a national quality improvement registry. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(4):1045-51.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.02.066.
Theochari NA, Theochari CA, Kokkinidis DG, Kechagias A, Lyros O, Giannopoulos S, et al. Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis. Surg Today. 2022;52(2):171–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02260-2.
Agzarian J, Litle V, Linkins LA, Brunelli A, Schneider L, Kestenholz P, et al. International Delphi survey of the ESTS/AATS/ISTH task force on venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in thoracic surgery: the role of extended post-discharge prophylaxis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(5):854–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz319.
Nicholson M, Chan N, Bhagirath V, Ginsberg J. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in 2020 and beyond. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2467.
Shargall Y, Brunelli A, Murthy S, Schneider L, Minervini F, Bertolaccini L, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in thoracic surgery patients: an international survey. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(2):331–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezz191.
Acknowledgment
Janani Reisenauer—Research Grant from intuitive surgical for robotic bronchoscopy research
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rocco, R., Reisenauer, J. The Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Esophago-Gastric Surgery: A Never-Ending Story. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 4037–4038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11572-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-11572-7