Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Reconstruction with Free Versus Local Flaps

  • Reconstructive Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) who underwent reconstruction with free versus local flaps.

Methods

From 2011 to 2017, we examined 8646 patients with first primary OCSCC who received surgery either with or without adjuvant therapy. Of these patients, 7297 and 1349 received free and local flap reconstruction, respectively. Two propensity score-matched groups of patients who underwent free versus local flap (n = 1268 each) reconstructions were examined. Margin status was not included as a propensity score-matched variable.

Results

Compared with local flaps, patients who received free flaps had a higher prevalence of the following variables: male sex, age < 65 years, pT3−4, pN1−3, p-Stage III−IV, depth ≥ 10 mm, margin > 4 mm, extranodal extension (ENE), and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified the reconstruction method (local vs. free flaps, only overall survival [OS]), age ≥ 65 years, pT3−4, pN1−3, p-Stage III−IV, depth ≥ 10 mm (only OS), margins ≤ 4 mm, and ENE as independent adverse prognosticators for disease-specific survival (DSS) and OS. The results of propensity score-matched analyses revealed that, compared with free flaps, patients who underwent local flap reconstruction showed less favorable 5-year DSS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 82%/77%; p = 0.0100) and OS (HR 1.21, 73%/68%; p = 0.0079).

Conclusions

After adjusting for covariates using multivariate models, and also by propensity score modeling, OCSCC patients who underwent free flap reconstruction showed a higher frequency of clear margins and a significant survival advantage compared with those who received local flaps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mücke T, Loeffelbein DJ, Hohlweg-Majert B, et al. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface—surgical management, outcome, and prognostic factors. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(12):1073–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mücke T, Wolff KD, Wagenpfeil S, et al. Immediate microsurgical reconstruction after tumor ablation predicts survival among patients with head and neck carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):287–95. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0758-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh TY, Chang KP, Lee SS, et al. Free flap reconstruction in patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of patient survival and cancer recurrence. Microsurgery. 2012;32(8):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Vicente JC, Rodríguez-Santamarta T, Rosado P, et al. Survival after free flap reconstruction in patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(2):453–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsing CY, Wong YK, Wang CP, et al. Comparison between free flap and pectoralis major pedicled flap for reconstruction in oral cavity cancer patients: a quality of life analysis. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(6):522–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.03.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanasono MM, Friel MT, Klem C, et al. Impact of reconstructive microsurgery in patients with advanced oral cavity cancers. Head Neck. 2009;31(10):1289–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang QG, Shi S, Li M, et al. Free flap reconstruction versus non-free flap reconstruction in treating elderly patients with advanced oral cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(7):1420–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsue TT, Desyatnikova SS, Deleyiannis FW, et al. Comparison of cost and function in reconstruction of the posterior oral cavity and oropharynx: free vs pedicled soft tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123(7):731–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1997.01900070075012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chepeha DB, Annich G, Pynnonen MA, et al. Pectoralis major myocutaneous flap vs revascularized free tissue transfer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(2):181–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.2.181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, et al. Comparison of the rectus abdominis free flap with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstructions in the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1992;164(6):615–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80719-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallet Y, El Bedoui S, Penel N, et al. The free vascularized flap and the pectoralis major pedicled flap options: comparative results of reconstruction of the tongue. Oral Oncol. 2009;45(12):1028–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.05.639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kroll SS, Evans GR, Goldberg D, et al. A comparison of resource costs for head and neck reconstruction with free and pectoralis major flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(5):1282–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199704001-00011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK (eds). AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th edn. New York: Springer; 2017–2018

  14. Huang R, Xu R, Dulai PS. Sensitivity analysis of treatment effect to unmeasured confounding in observational studies with survival and competing risks outcomes. Stat Med. 2020;39(24):3397–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao CT, Chang JT, Wang HM, et al. Analysis of risk factors predictive of local tumor control in oral cavity cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):915–22. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9761-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2021. Release date: November 9, 2020. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/. Accessed 21 Jan 2021

  17. Ariyan S. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap: a versatile flap for reconstruction for reconstruction in the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(1):73–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197901000-00012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin CY, Fan KH, Lee LY, et al. Precision adjuvant therapy based on detailed pathological risk factors for resected oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: long term outcome comparison of CGMH and NCCN guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(5):916–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Karmarkar S. Shrinkage based assessment of surgical margins: a need of the hour in oral cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(11):1336–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.05.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loree TR, Strong EW. Significance of positive margins in oral cavity squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1990;160(4):410–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80555-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM, Stringer SP, et al. An analysis of factors influencing the outcome of postoperative irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39(1):137–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00152-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutton DN, Brown JS, Rogers SN, et al. The prognostic implications of the surgical margin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(1):30–4. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McMahon J, O’Brien CJ, Pathak I, et al. Influence of condition of surgical margins on local recurrence and disease-specific survival in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;41(4):224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00119-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brandwein-Gensler M, Teixeira MS, Lewis CM, et al. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: histologic risk assessment, but not margin status, is strongly predictive of local disease-free and overall survival. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(2):167–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000149687.90710.21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Woolgar JA, Rogers S, West CR, et al. Survival and patterns of recurrence in 200 oral cancer patients treated by radical surgery and neck dissection. Oral Oncol. 1999;35(3):257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1368-8375(98)00113-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A. A histopathological appraisal of surgical margins in oral and oropharyngeal cancer resection specimens. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(10):1034–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng A, Cox D, Schmidt BL. Oral squamous cell carcinoma margin discrepancy after resection and pathologic processing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(3):523–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nason RW, Binahmed A, Pathak KA, et al. What is the adequate margin of surgical resection in oral cancer? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107(5):625–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ebrahimi A, Murali R, Gao K, et al. The prognostic and staging implications of bone invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117(19):4460–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Ronis DL, Fowler KE, et al. Quality of life scores predict survival among patients with head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(16):2754–60. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank the Research Service Center for Health Information (Chang Gung University, Taiwan) for the valuable input in the study design, data management, and statistical analysis. They also acknowledge the kind assistance of the Oral Cancer Advisory Group, National Health Research Institute, Taiwan.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Grants CMRPD1H0521 and BMRPC55 from the Chang Gung Medical Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Study concept and design: C-TL, Y-WW, SRL, LYY, C-HL: Data analysis and interpretation: C-TL, Y-WW, SRL, LYY, C-HL: Manuscript drafting or critical revision for important intellectual content: All authors. Final approval of the manuscript: All authors. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lan-Yan Yang PhD or Chih-Hung Lin MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosers

Chun-Ta Liao, Yu-Wen Wen, Shu Ru Lee, Shu-Hang Ng, Tsang-Wu Liu, Sen-Tien Tsai, Ming-Hsui Tsai, Jin-Ching Lin, Chih-Yen Chien, Pei-Jen Lou, Cheng Ping Wang, Pen-Yuan Chu, Yi-Shing Leu, Kuo-Yang Tsai, Shyuang-Der Terng, Tsung-Ming Chen, Cheng-Hsu Wang, Wen-Cheng Chen, Li-Yu Lee, Chien-Yu Lin, Hung-Ming Wang, Tuan-Jen Fang, Shiang-Fu Huang, Chung-Jan Kang, Kai-Ping Chang, Tzu-Chen Yen, Lan Yan Yang, and Chih-Hung Lin have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

SUPPLEMENTARY FIG. 1

. Kaplan–Meier plots of 5-year (a) disease-specific and (b) overall survival in the entire study cohort of patients with resected oral cavity cancer who underwent reconstruction with free versus local flaps (TIF 1554 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, CT., Wen, YW., Lee, SR. et al. Clinical Outcomes of Taiwanese Patients with Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Underwent Reconstruction with Free Versus Local Flaps. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 1130–1140 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10524-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10524-x

Navigation