Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Postoperative Chemotherapy on the Survival of Patients with High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to determine whether postoperative chemotherapy is associated with a survival benefit for patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the stomach, small bowel, or pancreas.

Methods

Patients were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2014. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce selection bias. To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients in different treatment groups, IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used.

Results

The inclusion criteria were met by 759 patients. The diagnosis was NEC of the stomach for 195 patients (25.7%), NEC of the small intestine for 278 patients (36.6%), and NEC of the pancreas for 286 patients (37.7%). Overall, 213 patients (28.1%) received postoperative chemotherapy after curative resection. For the patients who received chemotherapy, IPTW-adjusted survival showed no OS benefit. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated improved OS with observation (OB) for patients with NEC of the small intestine (hazard ratio [HR], 1.436; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.823; P = 0.003), T3 or T4 primary tumor (HR, 1.258; 95% CI 1.08–1.465; P = 0.003), node-positive disease (HR, 1.238; 95% CI 1.040–1.475; P = 0.0165), or positive resection margin (HR, 1.4283; 95% CI 1.02–2.00; P = 0.038).

Conclusions

In this national database analysis, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival for patients with poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NECs. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to understand better which patients in this high-risk population will benefit from additional systemic therapy and the need for continued development of more effective therapies for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017;19:991–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asamura H, Kameya T, Matsuno Y, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung: a prognostic spectrum. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dasari A, Mehta K, Byers LA, Sorbye H, Yao JC. Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: a SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer. 2018;124:807–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorbye H, Strosberg J, Baudin E, Klimstra DS, Yao JC. Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Cancer. Sep 15 2014;120(18):2814–2823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Strosberg JR, Coppola D, Klimstra DS, et al. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas. 2010;39:799–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013;42:557–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah MH, Goldner WS, Halfdanarson TR, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:693–702.

  11. Mao R, Li K, Cai JQ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation following resection for patients with nonmetastatic poorly differentiated colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35:5642–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:61–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:152–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Velayoudom-Cephise FL, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, et al. Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:657–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Busico A, Maisonneuve P, Prinzi N, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (H-NENs): histology and molecular analysis, two sides of the same coin. Neuroendocrinology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hijioka S, Hosoda W, Matsuo K, et al. Rb Loss and KRAS mutation are predictors of the response to platinum-based chemotherapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with grade 3: a Japanese multicenter pancreatic NEN-G3 study. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4625–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Merola E, Rinke A, Partelli S, et al. Surgery with radical intent: is there an indication for G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1348–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Youngwirth LM, et al. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve use or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1026–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wakeam E, Adibfar A, Stokes S, et al. Defining the role of adjuvant therapy for early-stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159:2043–54 e2049.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Schmitz MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

There are no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Baseline patient characteristics before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjustment of the stomach, small intestine, and pancreas subgroups. (TIFF 3120 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitz, R., Mao, R., Moris, D. et al. Impact of Postoperative Chemotherapy on the Survival of Patients with High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 114–120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08730-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08730-0

Navigation