Abstract
Background
This study aimed to determine whether postoperative chemotherapy is associated with a survival benefit for patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the stomach, small bowel, or pancreas.
Methods
Patients were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2014. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce selection bias. To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients in different treatment groups, IPTW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used.
Results
The inclusion criteria were met by 759 patients. The diagnosis was NEC of the stomach for 195 patients (25.7%), NEC of the small intestine for 278 patients (36.6%), and NEC of the pancreas for 286 patients (37.7%). Overall, 213 patients (28.1%) received postoperative chemotherapy after curative resection. For the patients who received chemotherapy, IPTW-adjusted survival showed no OS benefit. However, subgroup analysis demonstrated improved OS with observation (OB) for patients with NEC of the small intestine (hazard ratio [HR], 1.436; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.823; P = 0.003), T3 or T4 primary tumor (HR, 1.258; 95% CI 1.08–1.465; P = 0.003), node-positive disease (HR, 1.238; 95% CI 1.040–1.475; P = 0.0165), or positive resection margin (HR, 1.4283; 95% CI 1.02–2.00; P = 0.038).
Conclusions
In this national database analysis, postoperative chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival for patients with poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NECs. These findings highlight the need for continued efforts to understand better which patients in this high-risk population will benefit from additional systemic therapy and the need for continued development of more effective therapies for these patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd RV, Suster S. The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems. Pancreas. 2010;39:707–12.
Oronsky B, Ma PC, Morgensztern D, Carter CA. Nothing but NET: a review of neuroendocrine tumors and carcinomas. Neoplasia. 2017;19:991–1002.
Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology. 2020;76:182–188.
Asamura H, Kameya T, Matsuno Y, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung: a prognostic spectrum. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:70–6.
Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335–42.
Dasari A, Mehta K, Byers LA, Sorbye H, Yao JC. Comparative study of lung and extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: a SEER database analysis of 162,983 cases. Cancer. 2018;124:807–15.
Sorbye H, Strosberg J, Baudin E, Klimstra DS, Yao JC. Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Cancer. Sep 15 2014;120(18):2814–2823.
Strosberg JR, Coppola D, Klimstra DS, et al. The NANETS consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of poorly differentiated (high-grade) extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. Pancreas. 2010;39:799–800.
Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas. 2013;42:557–77.
Shah MH, Goldner WS, Halfdanarson TR, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:693–702.
Mao R, Li K, Cai JQ, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation following resection for patients with nonmetastatic poorly differentiated colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas. Ann Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003562.
Austin PC. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis. Stat Med. 2016;35:5642–55.
Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2004.
Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:61–72.
Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer SW, et al. Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:152–60.
Velayoudom-Cephise FL, Duvillard P, Foucan L, et al. Are G3 ENETS neuroendocrine neoplasms heterogeneous? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:649–57.
Heetfeld M, Chougnet CN, Olsen IH, et al. Characteristics and treatment of patients with G3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22:657–64.
Busico A, Maisonneuve P, Prinzi N, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (H-NENs): histology and molecular analysis, two sides of the same coin. Neuroendocrinology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503722.
Hijioka S, Hosoda W, Matsuo K, et al. Rb Loss and KRAS mutation are predictors of the response to platinum-based chemotherapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm with grade 3: a Japanese multicenter pancreatic NEN-G3 study. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4625–32.
Merola E, Rinke A, Partelli S, et al. Surgery with radical intent: is there an indication for G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms? Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:1348–55.
Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Youngwirth LM, et al. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy does not improve use or time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1026–33.
Wakeam E, Adibfar A, Stokes S, et al. Defining the role of adjuvant therapy for early-stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159:2043–54 e2049.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
There are no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Fig. S1
Baseline patient characteristics before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjustment of the stomach, small intestine, and pancreas subgroups. (TIFF 3120 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitz, R., Mao, R., Moris, D. et al. Impact of Postoperative Chemotherapy on the Survival of Patients with High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 114–120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08730-0
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08730-0