Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery Requiring Perioperative Heparinization in Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 17 September 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

We assessed the feasibility and safety of single-site laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer who required perioperative heparinization.

Methods

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of 390 patients who underwent single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2016. Antithrombotic drugs were stopped preoperatively and heparin was administered according to the operative risk of each patient, based on consultation with the cardiologist physician or neurosurgeon. Propensity score modeling was utilized to adjust for baseline characteristics.

Results

Of 390 patients, 29 were treated with standard bridging intravenous heparin therapy. Propensity matching identified 119 patients: 22 patients in the heparinization group and 97 in the control group. The matched groups were not significantly different in operation times, bleeding volumes, or conversion rate. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 17.9 days in the heparinization group and 9.5 days in the control group (p = 0.034). Postoperative bleeding was observed in 4 patients (18.2%) in the heparinization group and 11 patients (11.4%) in the control group (p = 0.646), while other complications were similar in the two study groups (p = 0.502). Of these other complications, thromboembolic events were observed in two patients in the heparinization group and one patient in the control group.

Conclusions

We found that single-site laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with heparinization was feasible and safe. Heparinization did not increase the risk of postoperative bleeding complications, but postoperative hospital stay was prolonged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 17 September 2019

    In the original article, Yuichiro Doki’s first and last names are transposed. The author’s name is correct as reflected here.

References

  1. Colvin H, Mizushima T, Eguchi H, et al. Gastroenterological surgery in Japan: the past, the present and the future. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017;1:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Takemasa I, Doki Y, Mori M, et al. Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:1110–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiraki M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using “the PainVision™ system” for quantitative analysis of pain sensation. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyo M, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. Long-term outcomes of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: comparison with conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:664–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishizawa Y, Hata T, Mori M, et al. Clinical benefits of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for postoperative delirium in elderly colon cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1434–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE, et al. Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:161–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:354–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Takahashi H, Takemasa I, Mori M, et al. The single-center experience with the standardization of single-site laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Today. 2017;47:966–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Allaf ME, et al. Laparoscopic renal-adrenal surgery in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy. J Urol. 2005;174:1020–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ercan M, Bostanci EB, Ozer I, et al. Postoperative hemorrhagic complications after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving long-term anticoagulant therapy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mita K, Ito H, Murabayashi R, et al. Postoperative bleeding complications after gastric cancer surgery in patients receiving anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet agents. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3745–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujikawa T, Tanaka A, Abe T, et al. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on patients undergoing gastroenterological surgery: thromboembolic risks versus bleeding risks during its perioperative withdrawal. World J Surg. 2015;39:139–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wakasugi M, Tei M, Suzuki Y, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is feasible and safe in patients on antithrombotic therapy: a single-center experience of 92 procedures. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10:301–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg. 2014;260:23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurth T, Walker AM, Glynn RJ, et al. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:262–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, et al. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:280–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leite W. Practical propensity score methods using R. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 2017

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang C, Gao Z, Shen K, et al. Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:962–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidekazu Takahashi MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Kazuya Iwamoto, Hidekazu Takahashi, Makoto Fujii, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Taishi Hata, Chu Matsuda, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Masaki Mori, and Doki Yuichiro declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 1

Representative case of laparoscopic surgery for advanced ascending colon cancer. (a) A 3 cm, single laparotomy was performed; (b) the CME was definitively completed; and (c) a central vascular ligation was performed at the root of the ileocolic artery and vein. (d) The resected specimen also shows that CME was properly completed. CME complete mesocolic excision (TIFF 1298 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iwamoto, K., Takahashi, H., Fujii, M. et al. Safety of Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery Requiring Perioperative Heparinization in Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 26, 4390–4396 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07794-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07794-x

Navigation