Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer

  • Pancreatic Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Conventional retrograde distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail have been associated with high rates of positive margins, low lymph node retrieval, and poor overall survival. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) was introduced in 2003 to overcome these limitations.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed and articles reviewed to determine if RAMPS or standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy offer better survival. The level of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

Results

Retrospective, single-institution series on RAMPS report mean lymph node counts as high as 24, and negative margin rates between 81 and 100%. Tangential margins are reportedly negative in 94% of patients undergoing RAMPS. Studies comparing RAMPS with standard distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy demonstrate significantly higher lymph node counts, but no improvement in overall survival with RAMPS.

Conclusion

Despite the theoretic advantages of RAMPS over standard resection, high-level evidence that demonstrates a survival benefit with RAMPS does not currently exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Christein JD, Kendrick ML, Iqbal CW, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Distal pancreatectomy for resectable adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:922–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shoup M, Conlon KC, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:946–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133:521–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:244–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson H, Hunt KK, Veeramachaneni N, et al. Operative standards for cancer surgery. Philadelphia: American Collge of Surgeons, Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guyatt G, Gutterman D, Baumann MH, et al. Grading strength of recommendations and quality of evidence in clinical guidelines: report from an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force. Chest. 2006;129:174–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F, Hawkins WG, Linehan DC, Strasberg SM. Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG, Strasberg SM. Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:432–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sasson AR, Hoffman JP, Ross EA, Kagan SA, Pingpank JF, Eisenberg BL. En bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: is it worthwhile? J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:147–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y, Ohtsuka T, Oda Y, Nakamura M. Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2016;40:2267–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Latorre M, Ziparo V, Nigri G, Balducci G, Cavallini M, Ramacciato G. Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79:1154–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park HJ, You DD, Choi DW, Heo JS, Choi SH. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2014;38:186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verbeke CS. Resection margins in pancreatic cancer: are we entering a new era? HPB. 2014;16(1):1–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;155:977–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Washington K, Berlin J, Branton P, et al. Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients with carcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer protocols. Washington, DC: College of American Pathologists; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1189–1200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimada K, Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Kosuge T. Prognostic factors after distal pancreatectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for invasive pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Surgery. 2006;139:288–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2848–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang YR, Han SS, Park SJ, et al. Surgical outcome of pancreatic cancer using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:5595–600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kitagawa H, Tajima H, Nakagawara H, et al. A modification of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the left pancreas: significance of en bloc resection including the anterior renal fascia. World J Surg. 2014;38:2448–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Murakawa M, Aoyama T, Asari M, et al. The short- and long-term outcomes of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. BMC Surg. 2015;15:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA

    Yun Shin Chun MD, FACS

Authors
  1. Yun Shin Chun MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Shin Chun MD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Yun Shin Chun has no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chun, Y.S. Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 25, 46–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5675-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5675-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation