Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

FAM46C Serves as a Predictor of Hepatic Recurrence in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancer

  • Translational Research and Biomarkers
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) relapse can occur even if curative resection is achieved. Biomarkers predicting recurrence are needed to provide appropriate postoperative surveillance and perioperative therapeutic strategy.

Methods

A global expression profiling was performed using tissues from GC patients with synchronous liver-confined metastasis. Family with sequence similarity 46, member C (FAM46C), was identified as a candidate biomarker. mRNA expression analysis, direct nucleotide sequencing, bisulfite sequencing and copy number assays for FAM46C were performed with eleven GC cell lines. Expression levels of FAM46C in primary GC tissues from 129 patients who underwent curative GC resection were determined and correlated with clinicopathological factors, including postoperative outcome.

Results

Levels of FAM46C mRNA differed among GC cell lines. Point mutations in FAM46C were detected in five GC cell lines accompanied with reduced FAM46C transcription. No hypermethylation was found in the promoter region of FAM46C. Copy number alterations were found in six GC cell lines with differing FAM46C transcription levels. Reduced FAM46C mRNA expression levels were detected in 117 (91 %) GC specimens compared with adjacent noncancerous tissues. Low FAM46C expression levels were significantly associated with larger macroscopic GC tumor sizes. The low FAM46C expression group was likely to have shorter disease-free survival than the high group and low FAM46C level was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence after curative resection. FAM46C expression levels were low in all cases that were later found to have hepatic recurrence.

Conclusions

Reduced GC expression of FAM46C is a potential biomarker to predict hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:5–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanda M, Murotani K, Kobayashi D, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 alters recurrence patterns and prognostic factors among patients with stage II/III gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Surgery. 2015;158:1573–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, Haustermans K, Prenen H. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lin LL, Huang HC, Juan HF. Discovery of biomarkers for gastric cancer: a proteomics approach. J Proteomics. 2012;75:3081–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanda M, Shimizu D, Fujii T, et al. Function and diagnostic value of Anosmin-1 in gastric cancer progression. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:721–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yachida S, Jones S, Bozic I, et al. Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2010;467:1114–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brosnan JA, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. A new branch on the tree: next-generation sequencing in the study of cancer evolution. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2012;23:237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim R, Schell MJ, Teer JK, Greenawalt DM, Yang M, Yeatman TJ. Co-evolution of somatic variation in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer may expand biopsy indications in the molecular era. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda M, Shimizu D, Tanaka H, et al. Metastatic pathway-specific transcriptome analysis identifies MFSD4 as a putative tumor suppressor and biomarker for hepatic metastasis in patients with gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:13667–79.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanda M, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, et al. Epigenetic suppression of the immunoregulator MZB1 is associated with the malignant phenotype of gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:2290–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 7th edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell: 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edn. Gastric cancer. 2011;14:101–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka H, Kanda M, Koike M, et al. Adherens junctions associated protein 1 serves as a predictor of recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Int J Oncol. 2015;47:1811–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oya H, Kanda M, Sugimoto H, et al. Dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 is a putative hepatocellular carcinoma tumor suppressor. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:590–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ezaka K, Kanda M, Sugimoto H, et al. Reduced expression of adherens junctions associated protein 1 predicts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22 Suppl 3:1499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boyd KD, Ross FM, Walker BA, et al. Mapping of chromosome 1p deletions in myeloma identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as being genes in regions associated with adverse survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7776–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barbieri M, Manzoni M, Fabris S, et al. Compendium of FAM46C gene mutations in plasma cell dyscrasias. Br J Haematol. 2015;174:642–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Affer M, Chesi M, Chen WD, et al. Promiscuous MYC locus rearrangements hijack enhancers but mostly super-enhancers to dysregulate MYC expression in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28:1725–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chesi M, Bergsagel PL. Advances in the pathogenesis and diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Int J Lab Hematol. 2015;37 Suppl 1:108–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoggins JW, Wilson SJ, Panis M, et al. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature. 2011;472:481–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pei H, Zhang L, Luo K, et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature. 2011;470:124–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e538–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carvalho CM, Pehlivan D, Ramocki MB, et al. Replicative mechanisms for CNV formation are error prone. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1319–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shen L, Shan YS, Hu HM, et al. Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:e535–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanda M, Kobayashi D, Tanaka C, et al. Adverse prognostic impact of perioperative allogeneic transfusion on patients with stage II/III gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanda M, Mizuno A, Fujii T, et al. Tumor infiltrative pattern predicts sites of recurrence after curative gastrectomy for stages 2 and 3 gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1934–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kodera Y, Fujitani K, Fukushima N, et al. Surgical resection of hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer: a review and new recommendation in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:206–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oki E, Tokunaga S, Emi Y, et al. Surgical treatment of liver metastasis of gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter cohort study (KSCC1302). Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:968–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsuro Kanda MD, PhD, FACS.

Ethics declarations

DISCLOSURE

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 17 kb)

10434_2016_5636_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 1038 kb) Supplementary Fig. 1 Peritoneal recurrences in the high and low FAM46C expression groups

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, H., Kanda, M., Shimizu, D. et al. FAM46C Serves as a Predictor of Hepatic Recurrence in Patients with Resectable Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3438–3445 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5636-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5636-y

Keywords

Navigation