Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of Prealbumin as a Powerful and Simple Index for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Gastric Cancer Surgery

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Preoperative factors, including nutritional status, may have strong correlations with postoperative morbidities. The current study evaluated preoperative prealbumin concentrations as a predictor of postoperative complications after gastric surgery.

Methods

A retrospective study of 1798 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma was performed. Information was collected on basic patient characteristics, preoperative laboratory findings, and 30 day postoperative complications. The patients were divided into three groups based on prealbumin concentrations (≥22 mg/dL, <22 to ≥15 mg/dL, and <15 mg/dL) for analysis.

Results

The overall complication rate was 21.7 %, and the infection rate was 16 %. Subgroup analysis based on prealbumin concentrations showed that complication rates were markedly elevated with decreasing concentrations of prealbumin. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model showed that both overall and infectious complications were strongly associated with male gender, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and decreased prealbumin levels (p < 0.05). Even in patients with a CRP level higher than 0.1 mg/dL, male gender and low prealbumin concentrations (<15 mg/dL) were significantly correlated with overall and infectious morbidities (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Preoperative prealbumin concentrations are useful predictors of short-term postoperative outcomes after gastrectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coburn N, Seevaratnam R, Paszat L, Helyer L, Law C, Swallow C, et al. Optimal management of gastric cancer: results from an international RAND/UCLA expert panel. Ann Surg. 2014;259:102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papenfuss WA, Kukar M, Oxenberg J, Attwood K, Nurkin S, Malhotra U, et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3008–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koppert LB, Lemmens VE, Coebergh JW, Steyerberg EW, Wijnhoven BP, Tilanus HW, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on surgical resection rate and survival in patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1693–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with paraaortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:453–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JH, Son SY, Lee CM, Ahn SH, Park do J, Kim HH. Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2877–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group. Morbidity and mortality in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group randomized clinical trial of D1 versus D2 resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:643–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim H-H, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han S-U, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report: a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubota T, Hiki N, Sano T, Nomura S, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, et al. Prognostic significance of complications after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:891–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang X, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kumagai K, Kubota T, Aikou S, et al. Prognostic importance of the inflammation-based Glasgow prognostic score in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:275–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bountziouka V, Panagiotakos BD. Statistical methods used for the evaluation of reliability and validity of nutrition assessment tools used in medical research. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16:3770–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11. Suh B, Park S, Shin DW, Yun JM, Keam B, Yang HK, et al. Low albumin-to-globulin ratio associated with cancer incidence and mortality in generally healthy adults. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2260–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kinoshita A, Onoda H, Imai N, Iwaku A, Oishi M, Tanaka K, et al. The C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, a novel inflammation-based prognostic score, predicts outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Slattery E, Patchett S. Albumin as a marker of nutrition: a common pitfall. Ann Surg. 2011;254:667–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis CJ, Sowa D, Keim KS, Kinnare K, Peterson S. The use of prealbumin and C-reactive protein for monitoring nutrition support in adult patients receiving enteral nutrition in an urban medical center. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2012;36:197–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu PJ, Cassiere HA, Dellis SL, Manetta F, Kohn N, Hartman AR. Impact of preoperative prealbumin on outcomes after cardiac surgery. JPEN J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2015;39:870–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawai H, Ota H. Low perioperative serum prealbumin predicts early recurrence after curative pulmonary resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. World J Surg. 2012;36:2853–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sankar A, Johnson SR, Beattie WS, Tait G, Wijeysundera DN. Reliability of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scale in clinical practice. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:424–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J-H, Park DJ, Kim H-H, Lee H-J, Yang H-K. Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien–Dindo classification. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1287–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tokunaga M, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Postoperative intraabdominal complications assessed by the Clavien–Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1854–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KG, Lee HJ, Yang JY, Oh SY, Bard S, Suh YS, et al. Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien–Dindo system. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:1269–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bae H-J, Lee H-J, Han D-S, Suh Y-S, Lee Y-H, Lee H-S, et al. Prealbumin levels as a useful marker for predicting infectious complications after gastric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2136–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eom BW, Joo J, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim Y-W, Lee JH. A body shape index has a good correlation with postoperative complications in gastric cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1115–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bartlett EK, Roses RE, Kelz RR, Drebin JA, Fraker DL, Karakousis GC. Morbidity and mortality after total gastrectomy for gastric malignancy using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Surgery. 2014;156:298–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tokunaga M, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Poor survival rate in patients with postoperative intraabdominal infectious complications following curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1575–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun H, Hu P, Shen H, Dong W, Zhang T, Liu Q, et al. Albumin and neutrophil combined prognostic grade as a new prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer: results from a large consecutive cohort. PloS One. 2015;10:e0144663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Iwasaki Y, Shibuya N, Kubota K. Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio for survival after surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:900–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaudiani JL, Sabel AL, Mehler PS. Low prealbumin is a significant predictor of medical complications in severe anorexia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord. 2014;47:148–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lourenço P, Silva S, Friões F, Alvelos M, Amorim M, Couto M, et al. Low prealbumin is strongly associated with adverse outcome in heart failure. Heart. 2014;100:1780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Hiki MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

There are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Hiki, N., Mine, S. et al. Role of Prealbumin as a Powerful and Simple Index for Predicting Postoperative Complications After Gastric Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 510–517 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5548-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5548-x

Keywords

Navigation