Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microsurgical Reconstructions for Head and Neck Cancers in Elderly Aged >80 Years: An Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life

  • Head and Neck Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The rising incidence of primary head and neck (H&N) cancers in the elderly presents a dilemma regarding the appropriateness of complex surgery in this assumed frail age group. With limited data on surgical morbidity, survival, and patient quality of life (QOL), this analysis aimed to broaden the understanding of safety and effectiveness of microsurgical treatment in very elderly H&N cancer patients.

Methods

A prospective database analysis was used to evaluate surgical outcomes (morbidity, survival, and QOL) in all patients aged 80 years and older undergoing microsurgical reconstruction for cutaneous and intra-oral H&N cancers between 2004 and 2014. Outcomes were assessed for their association with surgical, tumour, and patient variables. Comorbidities were categorized by the ACE27 index and postoperative morbidity by the Clavien–Dindo scoring system. QOL was analyzed using the UW-QOLv4.

Results

Of 720 microsurgical reconstructions, 96 patients were identified. Median survival was 25 months. The ACE27 index was the only variable significantly associated with survival with a 5-year survival of 59.2 % in the least comorbid group versus 19.7 % in the most comorbid group (p 0.015). ACE-27 showed influence on socioemotional QoL scores. Physical QOL scores were influenced by tumour and operative factors. Patients were found to value physical QOL over socioemotional.

Conclusions

Microsurgical reconstructions are well tolerated in the very elderly patients and should be considered predominantly based on comorbidity. Tumour stage, flap type, and cancer site should still form part of the preoperative counseling due to their implication on postoperative physical function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Derks W, de Leeuw JR, Hordijk GJ WJ. Reasons for non-standard treatment in elderly patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;262:21–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Research UK. Skin cancer statistics [Internet]. 2014. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/skin/.

  3. Peters TTA, Langendijk JA, Plaat BEC, Wedman J, Roodenburg JLN, van Dijk BAC, et al. Co-morbidity and treatment outcomes of elderly pharyngeal cancer patients: a matched control study. Oral Oncol. 2011;47(12):1159–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peters TTA, van Dijk BAC, Roodenburg JLN, van der Laan BFAM, Halmos GB. Relation between age, comorbidity, and complications in patients undergoing major surgery for head and neck cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(3):963–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Samet J, Hunt WC, Key C, Humble CG GJ. Choice of cancer therapy varies with age of patient. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;27(255):3385–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cancer Research UK. Oral cancer statistics [Internet]. 2014. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/oral/.

  7. Larson D, Larson G. Head and neck melanoma. Clin Plast Surg. 2010;37(1):73–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldenberg D, Mackley H, Koch W, Bann D V, Schaefer EW, Hollenbeak CS. Age and stage as determinants of treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers in the elderly. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(10):976–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Schroeff MP, Derks W, Hordijk GJ, de Leeuw RJ. The effect of age on survival and quality of life in elderly head and neck cancer patients: a long-term prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264(4):415–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adams P, Ghanem T, Stachler R, Hall F, Velanovich V, Rubinfeld I. Frailty as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in inpatient head and neck surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(8):783–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wester JL, Lindau RH, Wax MK. Efficacy of free flap reconstruction of the head and neck in patients 90 years and older. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(1):49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prabhat BK et al. Head and neck free flap reconstruction in Patients older than 80 years. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2014;30(8):523–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang Q-G, Shi S, Li M, Zhang X, Liu F-Y, Sun C-F. Free flap reconstruction versus non-free flap reconstruction in treating elderly patients with advanced oral cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(7):1420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khafif A, Posen J, Yagil Y, Beiser M, Gil Z, Ben-Yosef R, Landsberg R, Fliss DM. Quality of life in patients older than 75 years following major head and neck surgery. Head Neck, 2007;29(10):932–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cingi C. Nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck, an issue of facial plastic surgery clinics. Saunders. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paleri V, Wight RG, Silver CE, Haigentz M, Takes RP, Bradley PJ, et al. Comorbidity in head and neck cancer: a critical appraisal and recommendations for practice. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(10):712–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. DAHNO. National Head and Neck Cancer Audit 2013. Health & Social Care Information Centre UK. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/headandneck.

  18. Monteiro EE. Assessment of the Clavien–Dindo classification system for complications in head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perisanidis C, Herberger B, Papadogeorgakis N, Seemann R, Eder-Czembirek C, Tamandl D, et al. Complications after free flap surgery: do we need a standardized classification of surgical complications? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(2):113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lowe D, Rogers SN. University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire The University of Washington questionnaire. 2012;1–14. http://www.headandneckcancer.co.uk.

  21. Djan R, Penington A. A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(5):647–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrisset AT et al. radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh free flap for laryngopharyngectomy defects: prospective, randomized trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(4):448–453.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkinson KA, Freeth H MI. Are we “on the right trach?” The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death examines tracheostomy care. J Laryngol Otol. 2015;3:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rahnemai-Azar AA et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(24): 7739–7751.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwards AE, Seymour DG, McCarthy JM, Crumplin MK. A 5-year survival study of general surgical patients aged 65 years and over. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:3–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jin F. Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. Br J Anaest. 2001;87(4):608–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pedersen T, Eliasen K, Henriksen E. A prospective study of mortality associated with anaesthesia and surgery: risk indicators of mortality in hospital. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990; 34: 176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hosking MP, Lobdell CM, Warner MA, Offord KP, Melton LJ 3rd. Anaesthesia for patients over 90 years of age. Outcomes after regional and general anaesthetic techniques for two common surgical procedures. Anaesthesia. 1989;44(2):142–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Office for national statistics. statistical bulletin historic and projected mortality data from the period and cohort. 2013;1–14. http://www.ons.gov.uk.

  30. Office for national statistics. statistical bulletin interim life tables, England and. 2013;(October):2010–2. http://www.ons.gov.uk.

  31. Office for national statistics. statistical bulletin estimates of the very old (including and Wales. 2013:2002–12. http://www.ons.gov.uk.

  32. Oxford cancer intelligence unit. profile of head and neck cancers in England: incidence, mortality and survival. http://www.ncin.org.uk/.

  33. Laraway DC, Lakshmiah R, Lowe D, Roe B, Rogers SN. Quality of life in older people with oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(8):715–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Derks W, de Leeuw RJ, Hordijk GJ, Winnubst JA. Quality of life in elderly patients with head and neck cancer only one year after diagnosis. Head Neck. 2004;26(12):1045–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rogers SN, Miller RD, Ali K, Minhas AB, Williams HF, Lowe D. Patients’ perceived health status following primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(10):913–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. O. F. Dimovska MRCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dimovska, E.O.F., Clibbon, J.J., Moncrieff, M.D.S. et al. Microsurgical Reconstructions for Head and Neck Cancers in Elderly Aged >80 Years: An Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 1684–1692 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5049-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5049-3

Keywords

Navigation