Abstract
Elderly patients with head and neck cancer are less likely to receive standard treatment. This study assessed the influence that age, tumour characteristics, comorbidity, social support, depressive symptoms and quality of life have on treatment choice. One hundred and five patients between 45 and 60 years of age and 78 patients of ≥70 years of age with carcinoma of the oral cavity (stage ≥II), oro- and hypopharynx (stage ≥II) or larynx (stage ≥III) completed a questionnaire on quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35), depressive symptoms (CES-D) and social support (RSS12-I). In the 45–60 age group, 89% received standard treatment, compared with 62% of the ≥70 age group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the following factors predicted non-standard treatment: marital status (widowed), advanced tumour stage, comorbidity, less pain, considering the length of life less important than its quality and old age. This study showed that age itself independently influences treatment choice. However, it should be emphasised that the choice of a treatment should be based on a medical assessment and the patient’s preferences, not on chronological age.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376
Ampil FL, Mills GM, Stucker FJ, Burton GV, Nathan CA (2001) Radical combined treatment of locally extensive head and neck cancer in the elderly. Am J Otolaryngol 22:65–69
Barzan L, Veronesi A, Caruso G, Serraino D, Magri D, Zagonel V, Tirelli U, Comoretto R, Monfardini S (1990) Head and neck cancer and ageing: a retrospective study in 438 patients. J Laryngol Otol 104:634–640
Beausang ES, Ang EE, Lipa JE, Irish JC, Brown DH, Gullane PJ, Neligan PC (2003) Microvascular free tissue transfer in elderly patients: the Toronto experience. Head Neck 25:549–553
Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jensen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, Kaasa S (1994) Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Acta Oncol 33:879–885
Bridger AG, O’Brien CJ, Lee KK (1994) Advanced patient age should not preclude the use of free-flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Am J Surg 168:425–428
Chin R, Fisher RJ, Smee RI, Barton MB (1995) Oropharyngeal cancer in the elderly. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:1007–1016
Clayman GL, Eicher SA, Sicard MW, Razmpa E, Goepfert H (1998) Surgical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients 80 years of age and older. Head Neck 20:216–223
Derks W, de Leeuw JR, Hordijk GJ, Winnubst JA (2003) Elderly patients with head and neck cancer: short-term effects of surgical treatment on quality of life. Clin Otolaryngol 28:399–405
Goodwin JS, Hunt WC, Samet JM (1993) Determinants of cancer therapy in elderly patients. Cancer 72:594–601
Greenfield S, Blanco DM, Elashoff RM, Ganz PA (1987) Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients. JAMA 257:2766–2770
Hirano M, Mori K (1998) Management of cancer in the elderly: therapeutic dilemmas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:110–114
Jones AS, Beasley N, Houghton D, Husband DJ (1998) The effects of age on survival and other parameters in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. Clin Otolaryngol 23:51–56
Kaplan MH, Feinstein AR (1974) The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus. J Chronic Dis 27:387–404
Kowalski LP, Alcantara PS, Magrin J, Parise JO (1994) A case-control study on complications and survival in elderly patients undergoing major head and neck surgery. Am J Surg 168:485–490
McKenna RJ Sr (1994) Clinical aspects of cancer in the elderly. Treatment decisions, treatment choices and follow-up. Cancer 74:2107–2117
Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee, B, Pater J (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139–144
Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D Scale: a self-support depression scale for research in a general population. Appl Psychol Measurement 1:385–401
Rapidis AD, Keramidas T, Panagiotopoulos H, Andressakis D, Angelopoulos AP (1998) Tumours of the head and neck in the elderly: analysis of 190 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 26:153–158
Sarini J, Fournier C, Lefebvre JL, Bonafos G, Van JT, Coche-Dequeant B (2001) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients: a long-term retrospective review of 273 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:1089–1092
Silliman RA, Troyan SL, Guadagnoli E, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S (1997) The impact of age, marital status, and physician-patient interactions on the care of older women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 80:1326–1334
Singh B, Alfonso A, Sabin S, Poluri A, Shaha AR, Sundaram K, Lucente FE (2000) Outcome differences in younger and older patients with laryngeal cancer: a retrospective case-control study. Am J Otolaryngol 21: 92–97
Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JC, Kiebert GM, Kievit J, Leer JW (1996) Tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient Attitudes. Med Decis Making 16:184–192
van Eijk LM, Kempen GI, Sonderen FL (1994) A short scale for measuring social support in the elderly: the SSL12-I. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 25: 192–196
Yellen SB, Cella DF, Leslie WT (1994) Age and clinical decision making in oncology patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1766–1770
Acknowledgements
We thank the Dutch Cancer Society for grant support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Derks, W., de Leeuw, J.R.J., Hordijk, G.J. et al. Reasons for non-standard treatment in elderly patients with advanced head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262, 21–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0744-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-004-0744-x