Skip to main content
Log in

Risk Factors and Learning Curve Associated with Postoperative Morbidity of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is a challenging surgical procedure that has substantial technical difficulties and complications. In this study, we investigated risk factors for morbidity and mortality after LTG, and the learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity.

Methods

Prospectively constructed data of 203 patients undergoing LTG between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze risk factors for postoperative morbidity. The Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) technique was used to assess the learning curve.

Results

Postoperative morbidity and mortality after LTG was 18.7 and 1.5 %, respectively. Of 38 patients with postoperative morbidity, 7 (3.4 %) were managed with reoperation, 8 (4.0 %) with radiologic or endoscopic intervention, and 23 (11.3 %) with a conservative treatment. Of local complications, gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common (12 patients), followed by anastomosis leakage (9 patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (9 patients). Respiratory complication was the most common of the systemic complications. There were 17 cases (8.4 %) of complications exceeding grade III severity, of which anastomosis leakage was the most common. CUSUM analysis showed that postoperative morbidity reached a plateau after around 45 cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that old age (over 65 years of age) and surgical experience (<45 cases) were independent factors for postoperative morbidity after LTG.

Conclusion

LTG is a feasible technique with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, substantial surgical experience is of most importance to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, et al. Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:301–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011;11:69–77.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg. 2007;245:68–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, et al. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:721–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255:446–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shehzad K, Mohiuddin K, Nizami S, et al. Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. 2007;16:85–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eom BW, Kim YW, Lee SE, et al. Survival and surgical outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3273–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SE, Ryu KW, Nam BH, et al. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopy‐assisted total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopy‐assisted distal gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:392–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Zhao XF, Jung MR, Kim KY, Park YK. Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:3418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1997–2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong GA, Cho GS, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Song KY. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2009; 146:469–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong O, Jung MR, Kim GY, Kim HS, Ryu SY, Park YK. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216:184–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Omori T, Oyama T, Mizutani S, et al. A simple and safe technique for esophagojejunostomy using the hemidouble stapling technique in laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Am J Surg. 2009;197:e13–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, et al. Intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2167–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jeong O, Park YK. Intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2624–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Inaba K, Satoh S, Ishida Y, et al. Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:e25–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH. Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:7508–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin SH, Kim DY, Kim H, et al. Multidimensional learning curve in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:28–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunisaki C, Markino H, Yamamoto N, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008;18:236–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X, Tanigawa N. Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1259–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo CH, Kim HO, Hwang SI, Son BH, Shin JH, Kim H. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer during a surgeon’s learning curve period. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2250–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lim T, Soraya A, Ding L, Morad Z. Assessing doctors’ competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors’ performance. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14:251–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung MR, Park YK, Seon JW, Kim KY, Cheong O, Ryu SY. Definition and classification of complications of gastrectomy for gastric cancer based on the accordion severity grading system. World J Surg. 2012;36:2400–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 1994;4:146–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cho GS, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Kim MC, Ryu SY. Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1437–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steiner SH, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Treasure T. Monitoring surgical performance using risk-adjusted cumulative sum charts. Biostatistics. 2000;1:441–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We deeply appreciate Drs. HS Kim and MR Jung for their kind assistance with collecting and interpreting the data.

Conflict of interest

Oh Jeong, Seong Yeop Ryu, Won Yong Choi, Zhengri Piao, and Young Kyu Park declare that they have no proprietary, commercial, or financial interests that could be construed to have inappropriately influenced this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong Yeop Ryu MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeong, O., Ryu, S.Y., Choi, W.Y. et al. Risk Factors and Learning Curve Associated with Postoperative Morbidity of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2994–3001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3666-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3666-x

Keywords

Navigation