Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

15-year experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: analysis on short-term and long-term oncologic outcome

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is now a widely accepted treatment option for gastric cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence for LG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Many retrospective studies have shown that LG for AGC is safe and feasible, but very few studies have shown the actual outcome in general practice. The aim of this study is to analyze our last 15 years of experience in LG for AGC.

Methods

This is a retrospective review from May 2003 to May 2017 in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. A total of 1592 patients who had LG for AGC were enrolled of which 109 patients with open conversion were excluded. We evaluated the short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes of LG for AGC.

Results

A total of 1483 patients were analyzed. There were 432 cases of total gastrectomy, 982 cases of distal gastrectomy, and 69 cases of proximal gastrectomy. The total complication rate was 9.1% (135/1483), which included wound-related complications (0.7%), postoperative bleeding (0.5%), anastomosis or stump leakage (2.2%), intestinal obstruction (0.9%), pancreatic fistula (0.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (1.6%), and lung morbidity (3.0%). The rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 and above complications was 4.9%. Age was the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis (OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04, P = 0.01). 5-year overall survival stratified by stage was as follows: stage IB 88.9%, stage IIA 88.7%, stage IIB 84.2%, stage IIIA 71.7%, stage IIIB 56.8%, stage IIIC 45.4%, and stage IV 25%. Total recurrence rate was 14.4%, which included local recurrence (1.1%) and distant metastases (13.3%).

Conclusions

During our 15 years of experience, we have successfully performed 1483 cases of AGC with laparoscopy. Our results showed short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes that were comparable with other studies. LG is safe and feasible in general practice for advanced gastric cancer when performed by experienced surgeons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K (1994) Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4:146–148

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Takagi M, Yoshikawa T, Fukagawa T, Terashima M, Misawa K, Teshima S, Koeda K, Nunobe S, Fukushima N, Yasuda T, Asao Y, Fujiwara Y, Sasako M (2017) Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 20:699–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0646-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song K, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2016) Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 263(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Hyung WJ, for the Korean Laparoendoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2019) Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer. JAMA Oncol 263(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamabe A, Omori T, Tanaka K, Nishida T (2012) Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1702–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2096-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S, Ishida Y, Taniguchi K, Isogaki J, Inaba K, Yanaga K, Uyama I (2013) Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 27:286–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2442-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim K-H, Kim MC, Jung G-J, Choi H-J, Jang J-S, Kwon H-C (2012) Comparative analysis of 5 year survival results of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study using a propensity score method. Dig Surg 29:165–171. https://doi.org/10.1159/000338088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J-H, Son S-Y, Lee CM, Ahn S-H, Park DJ, Kim H-H (2013) Morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a phase II clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27:2877–2885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2848-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Wang K, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Hu Y, Liu H, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Liu F, Li Z, Zhao G, Yang K, Liu C, Li H, Chen P, Ji J, Li G, Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group (2019) Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3 year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 321:1983–1992. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hur H, Lee HY, Lee H-J, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Park Y-K, Kim W, Han S-U (2015) Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer 15:355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel (2019) Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 19:1–48. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kodera Y, Sano T (2016) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 20:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahn S-H, Jung D-H, Son S-Y, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim H-H (2014) Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 17:562–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0303-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA 49:509–531. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim H-H, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han S-U, Kim W, Ryu S-W, Lee H-J, Song KY (2010) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report–a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 251:417–420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M, Yamaue H, Yoshikawa T, Kojima K, JCOG Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group (2010) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric Cancer 13:238–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0565-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee J, Kim W (2009) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences. J Surg Oncol 100:693–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haruta S, Shinohara H, Hosogi H, Ohkura Y, Kobayashi N, Mizuno A, Okamura R, Ueno M, Sakai Y, Udagawa H (2017) Proximal gastrectomy with exclusion of no. 3b lesser curvature lymph node dissection could be indicated for patients with advanced upper-third gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 20:528–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0624-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park DJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Kim MC, Kim W, Ryu SY, Ryu SW, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Kim HH, Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2012) Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study. Surg Endosc 26:1548–1553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2065-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang SI, Kim HO, Yoo CH, Shin JH, Son BH (2009) Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 23:1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0140-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim W, Song KY, Lee H-J, Han S-U, Hyung WJ, Cho GS (2008) The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg 248:793–799. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181887516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T, Okuno K, Gokita K, Kojima K (2018) Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 32:735–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5730-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group (2008) Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 15:2692–2700. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kodera Y, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Gastric Cancer Surgery Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (2005) Identification of risk factors for the development of complications following extended and superextended lymphadenectomies for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 92:1103–1109. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Park DJ, Lee H-J, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KU, Choe KJ (2005) Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg 92:1099–1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li Z, Li B, Bai B, Yu P, Lian B, Zhao Q (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Oncol 27:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Obama K, Tamamori Y, Nabae T, Honda M, Abe T, LOC-A Study Group (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (LOC-A Study). Ann Surg 263(5):887–894. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang F, Lan Y, Tang B, Hao Y, Shi Y, Yu P (2017) Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted and open radical gastrectomy for stage T4a gastric cancer. Int J Surg 41:23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu Y, Hua J, Li J, Shi L, Yuan J, Du J (2017) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer with serous invasion: long-term outcomes. J Surg Res 215:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.03.048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There is nothing to acknowledge.

Funding

No funding was received

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung-Ho Kim.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Sa-Hong Min, Yongjoon Won, Guowei Kim, Yoontaek Lee, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, and Hyung-Ho Kim have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Min, SH., Won, Y., Kim, G. et al. 15-year experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: analysis on short-term and long-term oncologic outcome. Surg Endosc 34, 4983–4990 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07292-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07292-x

Keywords

Navigation