Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Radiation Therapy after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this review was to examine the incidence of nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement, the rates of NAC recurrence, and the data regarding the role of radiation therapy (RT) following nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM).

Methods

A literature review was performed using the PubMed search engine, with articles selected based on standardized criteria. Additional articles included those known to the authors and those obtained by review of references from key studies.

Results

The reported incidence of NAC involvement ranges from 0 to 58 %. The most commonly associated factors with NAC involvement include tumor-to-NAC distance, tumor size, central location of the primary tumor, multicentricity/multifocality, and positive axillary lymph nodes. Following NSM, in the setting of proper patient selection, rates of NAC recurrence are generally low, with the majority of studies reporting rates ranging from 0 to 4 %. There is a paucity of data evaluating the role of RT after NSM and a lack of level I evidence, with the largest series documenting low rates of local recurrence with RT but failing to provide a control arm without radiotherapy.

Conclusions

Optimal preoperative patient selection for NSM and intraoperative assessment of the NAC result in acceptably low rates of NAC involvement/recurrence. NSM alone is not adequate justification for post-mastectomy radiation. NSM should be taken into consideration to inform radiation decision making only when preoperative imaging, clinical features, or pathologic findings suggest higher risk for NAC involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maddox WA, Carpenter JT Jr, Laws HL, et al. A randomized prospective trial of radical (Halsted) mastectomy versus modified radical mastectomy in 311 breast cancer patients. Ann Surg. 1983;198:207–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, et al. Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. Lancet. 1996;348:708–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Liljegren G, Holmberg J, Bergh A, et al. 10-year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2326–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1143–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: long-term results of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:997–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holli K, Hietanen P, Saaristo R, Huhtala H, Hakama M, Joensuu H. Radiotherapy after segmental resection of breast cancer with favorable prognostic features: 12-year follow-up results of a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dragun AE, Huang B, Tucker TC, Spanos WJ. Increasing mastectomy rates among all age groups for early stage breast cancer: a 10-year study of surgical choice. Breast J. 2012;18:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sappey PC. Anatomie, physiologie, pathologie des vaisseaux lymphatiques considere chez l’homme et les vertebres. Paris: Leconsier; 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith J, Payne WS, Carney JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:546–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parry RG, Cochran TC Jr, Wolfort FG. When is there nipple involvement in carcinoma of the breast? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:535–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersen JA, Pallesen RM. Spread to the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg. 1979;189:367–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lagios MD, Gates EA,Westdahl PR, Richards V, Alpert BS. A guide to the frequency of nipple involvement in breast cancer. A study of 149 consecutive mastectomies using a serial subgross and correlated radiographic technique. Am J Surg. 1979;138:135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wertheim U, Ozzello L. Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol. 1980;4:543–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Quinn RH, Barlow JF. Involvement of the nipple and areola by carcinoma of the breast. Arch Surg. 1981;116:1139–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, et al. Involvement of the nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer. 1985;55:2459–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lüttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P. Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1987;113:481–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Santini D, Taffurelli M, Gelli MC, Grassigli A, Giosa F, Marrano D, et al. Neoplastic involvement of nipple-areolar complex in invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg. 1989;158:399–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34:1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:15–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb G, Singletary SE. The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:609–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lambert PA, Kolm P, Perry RR. Parameters that predict nipple involvement in breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4948–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weidong L, Wang S, Guo X, et al. Nipple involvement in breast cancer: retrospective analysis of 2,323 consecutive mastectomy specimens. Int J Surg Pathol. 2011;19:328–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang J, Xiao X, Wang J, et al. Predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement by breast carcinoma: histopathologic analysis of 787 consecutive therapeutic mastectomy specimens. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1174–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D’Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Billar JAY, Dueck AC, Gray RJ, Wasif N, Pockaj BA. Preoperative predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3123–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Hoshi K, Fukuma E. Is MRI useful for the prediction of nipple involvement? Breast Cancer. 2013;20:316–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, Sabo E, Weinzweig J. Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex imvolvement in breast cancer patients. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mallon P, Feron JG, Couturaud B, et al. The role of nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:969–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bishop CC, Singh S, Nash AG. Mastectomy and breast reconstruction preserving the nipple. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:87–9.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred and forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Caruso F, Ferrara M, Castiglione G, Trombetta G, De Meo L, Catanuto G, et al. Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: sixty-six months follow-up. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:937–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sacchini V, Pinotti JA, Barros AC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem? J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:704–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheung KL, Blamey RW, Robertson JF, Elston CW, Ellis IO. Subcutaneous mastectomy for primary breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;23:343–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gerber B, Krause A, Reimer T, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction is an oncologically safe procedure. Ann Surg. 2003;238:120–7.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:333–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordiero P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of the literature. Breast J. 2009;15:440–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:949–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c Randomized Trial. Lancet. 1999;353:1641–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ragaz J, Olivotto IA, Spinelli JJ, et al. Locoregional radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: 20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:116–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Abi-Raad R, Boutrus R, Wang R, Niemierko A, Macdonald S, Smith B, et al. Patterns and risk factors of locoregional recurrence in T1-T2 node negative breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:151–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yildirim E, Berberoglu U. Can a subgroup of node-negative breast carcinoma patients with T1-2 tumor who may benefit from postmastectomy radiotherapy be identified? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:1024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jagsi R, Raad RA, Goldberg S. Locoregional recurrence rates and prognostic factors for failure in node-negative patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:1035–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Truong PT, Lesperance M, Culhaci A, Kader HA, Speers CH, Olivotto IA. Patient subsets with T1-T2, node-negative breast cancer at high locoregional recurrence risk after mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Financial Disclosures

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Caitlin Gomez MD & Susan McCloskey MD

  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System, Akron, OH, USA

    Chirag Shah MD

  3. Department of General Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Nova Foster MD

  4. Michigan HealthCare Professionals/21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills, MI, USA

    Frank Vicini MD, FACR

Authors
  1. Caitlin Gomez MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chirag Shah MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan McCloskey MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nova Foster MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank Vicini MD, FACR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Vicini MD, FACR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomez, C., Shah, C., McCloskey, S. et al. The Role of Radiation Therapy after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2237–2244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3446-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3446-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation