Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Targetable Angiogenic and Growth Factors in Patients Undergoing Resection for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Circulating factors in patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers may promote tumor progression and metastasis and may be targeted for therapy.

Methods

Serum levels of ligands—vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), epidermal growth factor (EGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)—from four targetable pathways were measured before surgery, and levels were correlated to clinicopathologic characteristics and overall survival (OS).

Results

In 147 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, VEGF-A levels were higher in patients with R1 versus R0 resection (p = 0.037). High EGF levels were associated with poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.02). Elevated FGF2 levels were found in Lauren diffuse-type tumors (p = 0.017) and tumors with seven or more metastatic nodes (N3) (p < 0.042). Patients with advanced-staged tumors had higher HGF levels (p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 35 months, 46 patients (31 %) had died. Increased VEGF and HGF levels were correlated with decreased OS (p = 0.009 and 0.005). An adjusted total value (ATV) of all factors was better than any single factor in stratifying patients into good and poor prognosis groups (5-year OS 84.1 vs. 53.9 %, p = 0.005). By multivariate analysis, serum VEGF-A and ATV were significant independent prognostic factors (along with T and N category) for OS (p = 0.028 and 0.013, respectively).

Conclusions

In patients undergoing resection for gastric and GEJ cancer, high levels of angiogenic and growth factors are associated with unfavorable tumor characteristics and poorer overall survival. Thus levels of these factors can help delineate tumor biology and stratify prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng N, Goh LK, Wang H, et al. A comprehensive survey of genomic alterations in gastric cancer reveals systematic patterns of molecular exclusivity and co-occurrence among distinct therapeutic targets. Gut. 2012;61:673–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janjigian YY, Kelsen DP. Genomic dysregulation in gastric tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De VF, Giuliani F, Silvestris N, et al. Current status of targeted therapies in advanced gastric cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16(Suppl 2):S29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pietrantonio F, De BF, Da P, et al. A review on biomarkers for prediction of treatment outcome in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013;33:1257–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edn. New York: Springer; 2010.

  7. Wang J, Dang P, Raut CP, et al. Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database. Ann Surg. 2012;255:478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kattan MW, Karpeh MS, Mazumdar M, Brennan MF. Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oakman C, Santarpia L, Di LA. Breast cancer assessment tools and optimizing adjuvant therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li M, Liu F, Sun P, et al. Correlations between serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin with clinical pathological characteristics of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:1865–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Katoh M, Katoh M. FGF signaling network in the gastrointestinal tract (review). Int J Oncol. 2006;29:163–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cecchi F, Rabe DC, Bottaro DP. Targeting the HGF/Met signaling pathway in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:553–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bang YJ, Van CE, Feyereislova A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van CE, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3968–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van CE, de HS, Kang YK, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a biomarker evaluation from the AVAGAST randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lordick F, Kang YK, Chung HC, et al. Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Waddell T, Chau I, Cunningham D, et al. Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:481–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam S. Yoon MD.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 354 kb)

Supplemental Fig. 1

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of circulating factors (TIFF 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, D.J., Yoon, C., Thomas, N. et al. Prognostic Significance of Targetable Angiogenic and Growth Factors in Patients Undergoing Resection for Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 1130–1137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3429-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3429-0

Keywords

Navigation