Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Resection and Reconstruction with Colorectostomy. A Retrospective Study with Bootstrap Analysis

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to apply modern statistical methods to evaluate risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection in a retrospective cohort of patients who received a colorectostomy. Whereas a diverting stoma and tumor height are considered proven risk factors for anastomotic leakage, a lack of evidence about additional risk factors persists.

Methods

In a single-center study, 527 consecutive patients who received a colorectostomy after rectal cancer resection between 1991 and 2008 were retrospectively assessed. In addition to traditional uni- and multivariate regression, locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) regression and bootstrap analysis were applied to increase internal validity.

Results

Anastomotic leakage occurred in 70 patients (13.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 10.5–16.5%) and mortality was 2.5% (95% CI, 1.4–4.2%). Diverting stoma (odds ratio (OR), 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17–0.61) and tumor height (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.8–0.94) were proven to be protective. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.58–4.24) and intraoperative blood loss (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09) had a derogatory effect. Bootstrap analysis identified pre-existing vascular disease (95.5%), more advanced UICC stage III or IV tumors (95.7% or 91.5%, respectively), and intraoperative (96.1%) and postoperative (99.4%) blood substitution as harmful. Both intraoperative and postoperative blood substitution caused a dose-dependent increase in risk.

Conclusions

Applying statistical resampling methods identified intraoperative blood loss, blood substitution, vascular disease, and advanced UICC stage as risk factors for anastomotic leakage. Greater distances between the tumor and the anal verge and performance of a diverting stoma were associated with a decreased risk of anastomotic leakage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nastro P, Beral D, Hartley J, Monson JR. Local excision of rectal cancer: review of literature. Dig Surg. 2005;22:6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ptok H, et al. Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:269–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jestin P, Pahlman L, Gunnarsson U. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a case-control study. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:715–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitinen S. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:653–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vignali A, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:105–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi HK, Law WL, Ho JW. Leakage after resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis for colorectal malignancy: analysis of risk factors. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1719–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peeters KC, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boos DD. Introduction to the bootstrap world. Stat Sci. 2003;18:168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Altman DG, Andersen PK. Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a Cox regression model. Stat Med. 1989;8:771–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Austin PC, Tu JV. Bootstrap methods for developing predictive models. Am Stat. 2004;58:131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cleveland WS, Devlin SJ. Locally-weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:596–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zaheer S, et al. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg. 1998;227:800–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knight CD, Griffen FD. An improved technique for low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapler. Surgery. 1980;88:710–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clavien PA, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 1995;311:485.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Buchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246:207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunnarsson U, Karlbom U, Docker M, Raab Y, Pahlman L. Proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch—is a diverting stoma dangerous for the patient? Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:23–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Karliczek A, et al. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:569–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:260–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Valero G, et al. Neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in rectal cancer does not increase postoperative complications. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;18:495–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Buie WD, MacLean AR, Attard JA, Brasher PM, Chan AK. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation increases the risk of pelvic sepsis after radical excision of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1868–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Folkesson J, Nilsson J, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. The circular stapling device as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:275–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Alves A, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Camma C, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2000;284:1008–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pettersson D, et al. Interim analysis of the Stockholm III trial of preoperative radiotherapy regimens for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:580–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg. 2000;179:92–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sorensen LT, et al. Smoking and alcohol abuse are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 1999;86:927–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Miki C, et al. Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion, the related cytokine response and long-term survival after potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18:60–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:439–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rullier E, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85:355–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Martel G, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy and anastomotic leak after tumor-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Sources of financial support

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene Warschkow MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warschkow, R., Steffen, T., Thierbach, J. et al. Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Cancer Resection and Reconstruction with Colorectostomy. A Retrospective Study with Bootstrap Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 2772–2782 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1696-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-1696-1

Keywords

Navigation